Tiger teaches university of colorado at boulder
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 11

TIGER TEACHES University of Colorado at Boulder PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 71 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

TIGER TEACHES University of Colorado at Boulder. October 21, 2010 CIRTL Network Meeting PJ Bennett, Ph.D. Assistant Director Graduate Teacher Program. What is it?. TIGER TEACHES… funds small teaching as research projects in the STEM disciplines.

Download Presentation

TIGER TEACHES University of Colorado at Boulder

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Tiger teaches university of colorado at boulder

TIGER TEACHES University of Colorado at Boulder

October 21, 2010CIRTL Network Meeting

PJ Bennett, Ph.D.

Assistant DirectorGraduate Teacher Program


What is it

What is it?

  • TIGER TEACHES…

    • funds small teaching as research projects in the STEM disciplines.

    • The participating graduate students get a one time $2500 stipend for a semester long project.

    • Graduate students must have a faculty mentor in the department they are doing their research in.

    • Graduate students are selected on the strength and feasibility of their proposals.


The course research proposal

The Course Research Proposal

  • Each proposal will

    • identify the course

    • identify a question or hypothesis to test

    • select a methodology

    • develop an assessment process

  • We do help the graduate students refine their answers to these questions.

  • Lastly, all funded proposals are required to go through IRB approval.


What we require

What we require

  • By the end of the Semester

    • Data will be written up as a report for TIGER and CIRTL and have the for potential publication.


What we encourage

What we encourage

  • To present their research observations to the discipline-based education research (DBER) group at CU Boulder.

  • To apply for the CIRTL Exchange program.


Projects for fall 2010

Projects for Fall 2010

  • Laptops vs. paper methods for note taking: Which produces better learning?(Astronomy and Geography)

  • Assessing student attitudes in Geology 1030(Geology)


Note taking personnel

Note Taking (Personnel)

  • Dr. Douglas DuncanFaculty Mentor

  • Dr. Angel HoekstraQualitative Research Expert

  • Danielle MerrimanGraduate Student

  • Katherine FischerGraduate Student

  • Dr. Laura BorderCIRTL Program Advisor

  • Dr. PJ BennettTIGER/CIRTL staff member overseeing the projects


Note taking proposal

Note Taking (Proposal)

  • GEOG 1020, ASTR 1120, ASTR 1110, ASTR 1010

  • Does use of a laptop computer or electronic device help or harm student learning?

  • data collection will include: survey questions, designed to gather demographic data and method of note taking; observations of students note taking; qualitative interviews with students; and exam and clicker scores.

  • The students note taking will be correlated with their attitudes and test scores.


Student attitudes personnel

Student Attitudes (Personnel)

  • Dr. Lon Abbott Faculty Mentor

  • Jessica King Graduate Student

  • Dr. Laura BorderCIRTL Program Advisor

  • Dr. PJ BennettTIGER/CIRTL staff member overseeing the projects


Student attitudes proposal

Student Attitudes (Proposal)

  • Geology 1030

  • What are the attitudes of students in the redesigned Geology 1030 course with respect to the addition of online components and local geology examples?

  • Data will be collected by: Online Pre and Post tests, and final exam scores

  • Exam scores and pre post test will be compared to determine how student attitudes impact learning.


Projects that did not work

Projects that did not work

  • We had two projects that did not work out

  • One project was in the math department. However, the math department decided to do a project on Calculus III that involved all of the sections.

  • The second was in chemistry. However, it turned out that the student would only be looking at already collected data this semester.


  • Login