1 / 15

Photometric parallax method

Gyöngyi Kerekes Eötvös Lóránd University , Budapest. Photometric parallax method. István Csabai László Dobos Márton Trencséni. MAGPOP 2008, Paris. Overview. Estimate distances of stars  create 3 D maps Explore the structure of Milky Way Exponencial disks + power-law halo( es )

Download Presentation

Photometric parallax method

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Gyöngyi Kerekes Eötvös Lóránd University, Budapest Photometricparallaxmethod István Csabai László Dobos Márton Trencséni MAGPOP 2008, Paris

  2. Overview • Estimate distances of stars  create 3D maps • Explore the structure of Milky Way • Exponencial disks + power-law halo(es) • Dwarf galaxies (merging) and streams • Our goal: reproduce current distributions / find new structures • Improvements in outer regions, giants • Gaia (launch around 2011)

  3. Estimatingparallaxandotherphysicalparametersfromcolors QUERY TRAINING SET

  4. Juricetal, 2008 Polinomial fit to main sequence: Mr=f(r-i)

  5. Ourestimationmethod • Non-parametric estimator • We use all magnitudes (colors) from SDSS • Nearest neighbors of a point in a 5D space • Weight the estimated parameters with an exponencial distribution • Can be adopted to other photometric systems

  6. TrainingSet • MILES library • INDO-US library • Bright stars from SDSS • M67 • NGC 2420 • Total number of stars: 3392

  7. MILES and INDO-US spectra • These libraries were targeted to stars with different stellar parameters • Synthetic magnitudes • Crossmatchedwith Hipparcos catalog • Challenges: • wavelength coverage ofspectra is not enough • normalization of syntheticmagnitudes MILES+BaSeL

  8. Brightstarcatalogs • No bright stars in SDSS! • Observations with Photometric Telescope (50 cm) to calibrate SDSS stars to USNO stars • Crossmatch with Hipparcos  117 stars

  9. Openclustersfrom SDSS • First chosen as test objects • Turned out at estimation of distances that giants are overrepresented in the training set • After applying distance modulus from (Harris et al, 1996)  we added them to the TS. (1): Anthony-Twarog et al, 2006 (2): An et al, 2007 b.

  10. Trainingset Mr r-i

  11. Preliminaryresults SDSS Stripe 82 (Image coadd catalog with improved photometry) ~420,000 stars Mr Blue: ourestimation Red: Juric, 2008 g-r

  12. Preliminaryresults Applying Cartesian coordinate system: Blue: our estimation Red: Juric, 2008 Blue: Our estimation Red: Juric, 2008 Z (pc) Z (pc)

  13. SDSS Stripe 82 (notcoadd)

  14. Preliminaryresults • Stripe 82 in SDSS (~420,000 stars)

  15. Futureworks • Apply to all SDSS data • Calculate metallicity • Combine with kinematics (USNO, RAVE …) • GALEX crossmatch

More Related