Recommendations from plancoast adriatic national reports
Download
1 / 9

RECOMMENDATIONS from PlanCoast Adriatic National Reports - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 66 Views
  • Uploaded on

GAPS OPPORTUNITIES and the resulting. RECOMMENDATIONS from PlanCoast Adriatic National Reports. MSP on the Adriatic. Generally, no MSP yet Scattered responisibility for marine areas Few countries have some regulations on MSP (Slovenia, Montenegro) However, no significant activity

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' RECOMMENDATIONS from PlanCoast Adriatic National Reports' - kamea


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Recommendations from plancoast adriatic national reports

GAPS

OPPORTUNITIES and the resulting

RECOMMENDATIONS from PlanCoast Adriatic National Reports


Msp on the adriatic
MSP on the Adriatic

  • Generally, no MSP yet

  • Scattered responisibility for marine areas

  • Few countries have some regulations on MSP (Slovenia, Montenegro)

  • However, no significant activity

  • PlanCoast pilot projects as pioneer


Gaps

  • Old-fashioned vertical structures

  • Not enough horizontal (sectoral coordination)

  • Almost no land-sea integration

  • Not sufficient participation

  • Data collection&management problems


Potentials
Potentials

  • SEA/TIA

  • Marine Protected Areas

  • International cooperation:

    • Adriatic Action Plan 2020 of the Adriatic Forum

    • UNEP Mediterranean Commission on Sustainable Development (MCSD)

    • Croatian-Italian-Slovenian Commission for the Protection of the Adriatic

    • Adriatic Euroregion?


Conclusions recommendations
Conclusions/Recommendations

  • ICZM should be the responsibility of political bodies at all levels:

    national level responsible for overall framework / regional level taking the lead for implementation

  • Do not create new ICZM institutions -improve the use of existing ones

  • Cross-Sectoral Agencies


Conclusions recommendations1
Conclusions/Recommendations

  • Link regional approach with case specific solutions

  • Spatial Planning should play a central role - but cannot substitute ICZM

  • Create legal framework for MSP

    • Define basic national policies for offshore development which are coordinated cross-sectorally


Tools methods
Tools / Methods

  • Improve availability and accessibility of mapped information

    • Improve stocktaking

    • Link coastal data collection and management

    • Agree on systematic information exchange concerning offshore uses

    • Create regularly updated coastal and maritime cadastre


Tools methods1
Tools / Methods

  • Improve effectiveness of cross-border consultation for offshore development plans and projects

    • Develop transnationally concerted plans for offshore infrastructure corridors

  • Prepare indicative guidelines for content and procedure of sea use planning

  • Prepare spatial plans for offshore areas, where needed


Tools methods2
Tools / Methods

  • Introduce project oriented and cross-sectoral coordination procedures

    • Use territorial impact assessment (TIA) including EIA for projects

  • Defining the working methods for the informal dialogue


ad