Physical Security Functional Perspective

1. Physical SecurityFunctional Perspective Mr. Richard MillerChief, Physical Security Branch Operations Division -------- OPMG-RM WorkshopMay 2007

2. Agenda • Efficiencies through improved business processes & procedures. • Integrating with major Army Initiatives

3. Efficiencies • De-scope intrusion detection system projects • Can’t resource all that is desired. • Site surveys must consider what 190-series policy requires (AA&E, nuke/chem/bio, narcotics…) • Greater coverage might require reimbursable funds for AAFES, NAF, for-profit corporations, and discretionary areas • Inclusion of AR 37-49 BASOPS reimbursable matters into PS policy is in development.

4. Efficiencies • Enhance security, standardize operations & reduce costs: • Do our projects achieve these goals? • Can benefits be measured? • Business Case Analysis required • High interest in technology to achieve these three requirements

5. Efficiencies • Manpower requirements • Existing and new requirements must be justified • Availability Factor – CME – 2087hrs • “ “– Gov Civ – 1740hrs • Expect critical reviews • Business Case Analysis required • High interest in technology to achieve these three requirements • If not tied directly to a DoD/HQDA requirement – will not validate • “Essential Needs” driving the Train!!!

6. Integrating w/Army Initiatives • Physical Security Planning must consider: • Grow the Army • Global repositioning • BRAC (*) • Modular Force • Growth Factors are critical for ACP throughput capacity (Guards and Entry Lanes) and IDS Replacement (# of Zones) *BRAC (closure). Does not automatically mean the site is off the IDS planning chart. Maybe PMCS $$ needed to strengthen existing system until doors close. * BRAC (realignment). Need as much info as possible to properly program IDS increases

7. Questions

8. Back-Up Slides Follow…

9. MDEP SUMMARY OF CHANGES (FY08-13 POM) Amounts in $K

10. Where are your FY08 MDEP requirements programmed What FY08 requirements are critical?

11. Requested Requirement Changes OMA ROLL UP for Base Operations Source data file is PB07 LOCK: Amount in $K • Rationale for requirements change: • Reflects a significant decrease in CSG costs • Includes increase in ACP Maint, Automation Maint., and ACP consumables • Difference in AIM-HI: • Does not include CSG requirements – funded for MDEP-VONE/VIRQ • Does not include Mission req’s • Does not include non-land holding MACOMs • Rationale for critical requirement amount: • Limited to CIV Pay (TDA), IDS/ESS/ACP Maint./Monitoring, Recurring Contracts associated with critical ACP Functions, and CSG’s.

12. Requested Requirement Changes OMA ROLL UP (Mission) Source data file is PB07 LOCK: Amount in $K • Rationale for requirements change: • This is first time we broke out Mission separately! • Rationale for critical requirement amount: • Limited to CIV Pay (TDA), IDS/ESS/ACP Maint./Monitoring, Recurring Contracts associated with critical ACP Functions, and CSG’s.

13. Requested Requirement Changes OMNG ROLL UP Source data file is PB07 LOCK: Amount in $K • Rationale for requirements change: • See follow-on slides for Cmd & APE details • Rationale for critical requirement amount: • Limited to CIV Pay (TDA), IDS/ESS/ACP Maint./Monitoring, Recurring Contracts associated with critical ACP Functions, and CSG’s.

14. Requested Requirement ChangesOMAR ROLL UP Source data file is PB07 LOCK: Amount in $K • Rationale for requirements change: • See follow-on slides for Cmd & APE details • Rationale for critical requirement amount: • See follow-on slides for Cmd & APE details

15. Requested Requirement Changes OPA ROLL UP Source data file is PB07 LOCK: Amount in $K • Rationale for requirements change: • PSE items have completed RDT&E cycle – now ready for production • ACP automation investment • New req’s due to BRAC, modularity & IGPBS (mainly alarm systems) • $150M ACP FY06 Supplemental did not survive OSD – added into FY08-10 • OPA requirements and funding will roll to Command Code 210. • Increase in ESS to comply w/SecDef directive to secure Bio assets (AR 190-xx, Biological Select Agent & Toxin Security Program) • Rationale for critical requirement amount: • PSE items have completed RDT&E cycle – now ready for production • Complete VCSA-directed ACPEP initiative – installed portion • Initial fielding of MDARS, LKMD, TVSS & FIRRE • Initial ACP technology • Re-hab alarms at large ammo supply points in Germany (Miesau & Weilerbach)

16. FY08-13 UFRs UFR Priority: 1 (Amount in $K) • UFR DESCRIPTION: Physical Security Personnel (CSG’s) • Security Forces & Technicians - All personnel and operating costs associated with security forces whose primary or supporting mission is to safeguard personnel, facilities, or critical assets. • UFR IMPACT: • Cannot properly secure Army installations & facilities • May require Borrowed Military Manpower (BMM) • Degrades Army readiness • Increases vulnerability to Soldiers, their families and civilian employees

17. FY08-13 UFRs UFR Priority: 2 (Amount in $K) • UFR DESCRIPTION: Procurement of physical security systems for use in automated access control, access control point equipment program (ACPEP), intrusion detection systems (IDS), personnel identity management, and comprehensive force protection applications. • UFR IMPACT: • Cannot complete VCSA-directed ACPEP initiative (installed portion) , which will result in - • Delayed fielding of ACP automated identification technology; which will result in a – • Continuation of the contract security guard requirement to check ID cards. • Unable to secure arms, ammunition, explosives and sensitive items in a safe, secure manner (IDS) • Aging IDS means more guards • Some older IDS no longer have repair parts in inventory

18. Issues • Approximately $150M OPA needed each year. Needs will increase as more tactical PS equipment items come out of their RDT&E phase, Technology for Access Control Points goes into place and until the VCSA-Directed Access Control Point Equipment Program is completed. • Need better fidelity on USAREUR IGPBS schedule. • Funding for ARCENT (Current guidance is that CONOPS funds Iraq & Afghanistan) • Detailed Way Ahead for Army ACP Automation pending final results of Ft. Hood Demo – Aug/Sep 06. • In discussion w/EE PEG reps regarding transferring dual-use PSE. • Installed portion of ACPEP ($150M) remains incomplete – requested unsuccessfully in FY06 Supplemental. ACPEP must be completed before new automation can be integrated.

19. Program Does • Fund 100% authorized CivPay (not overhires) • Fund maintenance/monitoring of electronic security systems and Access Control Equipment • Begin to standardize infrastructure to receive ACP automation • Provide for Production/Fielding of 4 new PSE systems (LKMD, TVSS • MDARS, FIRRE) which will provide additional FP capabilities to deployed/BASOPS forces. Program Does Not • Complete VCSA-directed ACPEP (21 of 133 CONUS installations) • Fund CONOPS, AWCF, TWCF, DHP, and NAF requirements. • Fund the total CSG requirement • Replace Alarm Systems in a timely manner • Fund New or replacement Explosives Detection Equipment. • Fund New or replacement Lightly Armored Vehicles. • Fund New CCTV or Access Control Systems at other than Installation ACPs. • Fund New Blast Mitigation projects (window protection, blast walls, etc) • Fund New Fencing, Lighting or other Site Improvements. • Fund Training for critical PSE.

20. POM Building “Do’s” • Do … • Put the bottom line up front by stating what you need. Then follow that fact with supporting details. • Cite Army physical security policy requirements by regulation, chapter, para and sub-para. • Include enough details to validate. • Separate salary out from other personnel costs. • Cite one requirement per Schedule 75 record. • Cite project number for MILCON requirements.

21. POM Building “Do Not’s”