1 / 24

Department of Information and Communications Engineering Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain

Probability model for multi-component images through Prior-component Lookup Tables. Francesc Aulí -Llinàs. Department of Information and Communications Engineering Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain. TABLE OF CONTENTS. INTRODUCTION. PCLUT METHOD. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS. CONCLUSIONS.

kael
Download Presentation

Department of Information and Communications Engineering Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Probability model for multi-component images through Prior-component Lookup Tables Francesc Aulí-Llinàs Department of Information and Communications Engineering UniversitatAutònoma de Barcelona, Spain

  2. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PCLUT METHOD EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS CONCLUSIONS • PCLUT ADVANTAGES • Memoryrequirements: only 2 components in memory • Computationalcosts: reduction in 1/3 (mainlyduetotheprobabilitymodel) • Coding performance: equivalentto 1 level of Haartransformalongthedepth axis • Componentscalability: equivalentto 1 level of Haartransformalongthedepth axis

  3. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PCLUT METHOD EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS CONCLUSIONS • PCLUT ADVANTAGES • Memoryrequirements: only 2 components in memory • Computationalcosts: reduction in 1/3 (mainlyduetotheprobabilitymodel) • Coding performance: equivalentto 1 level of Haartransformalongthedepth axis • Componentscalability: equivalentto 1 level of Haartransformalongthedepth axis

  4. INTRODUCTION HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGES

  5. INTRODUCTION TYPICAL CODING SCHEME

  6. INTRODUCTION TYPICAL CODING SCHEME

  7. INTRODUCTION TYPICAL CODING SCHEME

  8. INTRODUCTION TYPICAL CODING SCHEME

  9. INTRODUCTION TYPICAL CODING SCHEME

  10. INTRODUCTION TYPICAL CODING SCHEME ARITHMETIC CODER CODESTREAM

  11. INTRODUCTION TYPICAL CODING SCHEME • DISADVANTAGES • Highmemoryrequirements • Highcomputationalcosts • Poorcomponentscalability RESEARCH PURPOSE Lossycodingschemeforhyper-spectralimages withlowmemoryrequirements, lowcomputational costs, and highcomponentscalability ARITHMETIC CODER CODESTREAM

  12. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PCLUT METHOD EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS CONCLUSIONS • PCLUT ADVANTAGES • Memoryrequirements: only 2 components in memory • Computationalcosts: reduction in 1/3 (mainlyduetotheprobabilitymodel) • Coding performance: equivalentto 1 level of Haartransformalongthedepth axis • Componentscalability: equivalentto 1 level of Haartransformalongthedepth axis

  13. PCLUT METHOD MAIN INSIGHTS 1) Wavelet transformonlyonthe spatialdimensions reduces computationalcosts reduces memoryrequirements increasescomponentscalability reduces coding performance

  14. PCLUT METHOD MAIN INSIGHTS 1) Wavelet transformonlyonthe spatialdimensions reduces computationalcosts reduces memoryrequirements increasescomponentscalability reduces coding performance

  15. PCLUT METHOD MAIN INSIGHTS 1) Wavelet transformonlyonthe spatialdimensions reduces computationalcosts reduces memoryrequirements increasescomponentscalability reduces coding performance 2) Enhancedprobabilitymodel foremitted symbols reduces computationalcosts increasescoding performance

  16. PCLUT METHOD PRIOR COEFFICIENT LOOKUP TABLES METHOD LUT ARITHMETIC CODER CODESTREAM

  17. PCLUT METHOD PRIOR COEFFICIENT LOOKUP TABLES METHOD REFINEMENT CODING SIGNIFICANCE CODING

  18. PCLUT METHOD PRIOR COEFFICIENT LOOKUP TABLES METHOD REFINEMENT CODING SIGNIFICANCE CODING

  19. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PCLUT METHOD EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS CONCLUSIONS • PCLUT ADVANTAGES • Memoryrequirements: only 2 components in memory • Computationalcosts: reduction in 1/3 (mainlyduetotheprobabilitymodel) • Coding performance: equivalentto 1 level of Haartransformalongthedepth axis • Componentscalability: equivalentto 1 level of Haartransformalongthedepth axis

  20. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS CODING PERFORMANCE 3 AVIRIS images 512x512x224 (16bps) 1 usedto generateLUTs 3 Hyperionimages 768x256x242 (12bps) 1 usedto generateLUTs AVIRIS – yellowstone sc01 Hyperion – flooding

  21. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS COMPUTATIONAL COSTS 3 AVIRIS images 512x512x224 (16bps) 1 usedto generateLUTs 3 Hyperionimages 768x256x242 (12bps) 1 usedto generateLUTs THROUGHPUT (in seconds) MEMORY REQUIREMENTS (in MB)

  22. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PCLUT METHOD EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS CONCLUSIONS • PCLUT ADVANTAGES • Memoryrequirements: only 2 components in memory • Computationalcosts: reduction in 1/3 (mainlyduetotheprobabilitymodel) • Coding performance: equivalentto 1 level of Haartransformalongthedepth axis • Componentscalability: equivalentto 1 level of Haartransformalongthedepth axis

  23. CONCLUSIONS PRIOR COEFFICIENT LOOKUP TABLES TYPICAL CODING SCHEME LUT • PCLUT ADVANTAGES • Memoryrequirements: only 2 components in memory • Computationalcosts: reduction in 1/3 (mainlyduetotheprobabilitymodel) • Coding performance: equivalentto 1 level of Haartransformalongthedepth axis • Componentscalability: equivalentto 1 level of Haartransformalongthedepth axis ARITHMETIC CODER ARITHMETIC CODER CODESTREAM CODESTREAM

  24. CONCLUSIONS PRIOR COEFFICIENT LOOKUP TABLES TYPICAL CODING SCHEME LUT • PCLUT ADVANTAGES • Memoryrequirements: only 2 components in memory • Computationalcosts: reduction in 1/3 (mainlyduetotheprobabilitymodel) • Coding performance: equivalentto 1 level of Haartransformalongthedepth axis • Componentscalability: equivalentto 1 level of Haartransformalongthedepth axis ARITHMETIC CODER ARITHMETIC CODER CODESTREAM CODESTREAM

More Related