1 / 21

Seating Assignments

Seating Assignments. Front of Room. TBD. TBD. TBD. TBD. TBD. TBD. Welcome back to the ASCE Ex CE Ed Teaching Workshop. Fred Meyer Al Estes. The Rocket BOOM…ahhhh…. USMA, rah rah! USMA, rah rah! HOORAH, HOORAH Army, rah! TEACH, TEACH, TEACH!. COURSE SCHEDULE. WEDNESDAY.

juliet-roberts
Download Presentation

Seating Assignments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Seating Assignments Front of Room TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

  2. Welcome back to the ASCE ExCEEd Teaching Workshop Fred Meyer Al Estes

  3. The Rocket BOOM…ahhhh…. USMA, rah rah! USMA, rah rah! HOORAH, HOORAH Army, rah! TEACH, TEACH, TEACH!

  4. COURSE SCHEDULE WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY MONDAY Admin & Gift Admin & Gift Admin & Gift Admin & Gift 8:00 Demo Class I Lab III Practice Class 1 Lab IV Practice Class 2 Design of Instruction Rapport Making it Work Learning Styles 10:00 Assessment Learning Objectives ASCE Initiatives Graduation 12:00 Lunch/Tour Lab IIIB Working Lunch Admin & Gift Planning A Class You Are Here Teacher Performer Intro to ETW Lab V Practice Class 3 2:00 Questioning Chalkboard Demo Class III Lab IA Teaching Assessment Learning To Teach Lab II Objectives 4:00 Demo Class II NonVerbal Principles of Teaching & Learning Class Prep & Working Dinner Dinner & Tour Class Prep & Working Dinner 6:00 Lab I Team- Building Hudson River Cruise Class Prep

  5. Seminar III An Introduction toLearning Styles Fred Meyer

  6. Background Knowledge Probe • Rate your own level of familiarity with Learning Styles Theory: • Nearly 2/3 indicated that you have never heard of this. have heard of it but don’t know what it means.

  7. Learning Styles • The Big Idea: • People learn in different ways. • So what? • Characterize these differences in terms of the dimensions of the learning process. • Use this theoretical framework to guide the planning and delivery of instruction.

  8. Learning Style Dimensions(Felder’s Model) • Perception • Input • Organization • Processing • Understanding sensory- intuitive visual- verbal inductive- deductive active- reflective sequential- global Study Guide, Page 17

  9. Learning Style DimensionsPerception sensory- intuitive Sights, sounds, physical sensations (Practical and methodical) Ideas, insights, memories (Abstract and imaginative)

  10. Learning Style Dimensions Input visual- verbal Pictures, diagrams, graphs, demonstrations Sounds, written and spoken words, formulas

  11. Learning Style Dimensions Organization inductive- deductive Facts and observations first, then infer principles (Natural human learning style) Principles given first, then deduce applications (Natural human teaching style)

  12. Learning Style DimensionsProcessing active- reflective Learn by thinking things through Learn by interacting with others

  13. Learning Style DimensionsUnderstanding sequential- global Learn in a logical progression of small incremental steps (Solve problems without complete understanding) Learn in large disconnected jumps (Solve problems—all or nothing)

  14. Don’t Misinterpret the Skit • There are 32 learning styles, not two. • A learning style preference can be strong or weak. • A learning style preference can change: • With time, • And possibly even with subject matter.

  15. Undergrads 59% 39% 73% 25% 37% 63% 50% 47% 75% 24% Faculty You Learning Style Preferences Sensing 36% 63%* Intuitive 61% 33%* Visual 73% 88%* Verbal 26% 8%* Inductive 25% 58% Deductive 75% 40% Active 38% 33%* Reflective 60% 54%* Sequential 70% 71% Global 27% 29%

  16. Consequences ofTeaching-Learning Mismatches • Students taught only in their less-preferred mode can’t learn effectively. • Students taught only in their preferred mode won’t develop balanced learning skills.

  17. Most Engineering Instruction Favors: sensory - intuitive visual - verbal inductive- deductive active - reflective sequential -global

  18. So What? • Give all students opportunities to learn in their preferred modes some of the time. • Vary: • Organization • Teaching techniques • Learning activities

  19. Conclusions • You’ll find students of all learning styles in your classes. • We need all types in the engineering profession. • We need to address all styles in our classes, not just one! We’ll discuss specific applications soon...

  20. Classroom Assessment Technique #3 Minute Paper 5

  21. Seminar III An Introduction toLearning Styles Questions?

More Related