1 / 47

Effective long-range interactions in driven systems David Mukamel

Effective long-range interactions in driven systems David Mukamel. Systems with long range interactions. two-body interaction. in d dimensions. for σ <0 the energy is not extensive -strong long-range interactions . self gravitating systems (1/r) σ =-2

julie
Download Presentation

Effective long-range interactions in driven systems David Mukamel

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Effective long-range interactions in driven systems David Mukamel

  2. Systems with long range interactions two-body interaction in d dimensions for σ<0 the energy is not extensive -strong long-range interactions

  3. self gravitating systems (1/r) σ=-2 ferromagnets σ=0 2d vortices log(r) σ=-2

  4. These systems are non-additive A B As a result, many of the common properties of typical systems with short range interactions are not shared by these systems.

  5. heat current T1 T2 T1>T2 charge current E Local and stochastic dynamics No detailed balance (non-vanishing current) What is the nature of the steady state? Driven systems

  6. drive in conserving systems result in many cases in long range correlations What can be learned from systems with long-range interactions on steady state properties of driven systems?

  7. the entropy may be neglected in the thermodynamic limit. In finite systems, although E>>S, if T is high enough E may be comparable to TS, and the full free energy need to be considered. (Self gravitating systems, e.g. globular clusters) Systems with long range interactions Free Energy: since

  8. Globular clusters are gravitationally bound concentrations of approximately ten thousand to one million stars, spread over a volume of several tens to about 200 light years in diameter.

  9. Thus although and E may be comparable to TS For the M2 cluster N=150,000 stars R= 175 light years Kg

  10. One may implement the large T limit by rescaling the Hamiltonian

  11. _ + For example, consider the Ising model: Although the canonical thermodynamic functions (free energy, entropy etc) are extensive, the system is non-additive

  12. Features which result from non-additivity Thermodynamics Negative specific heat in microcanonical ensemble Inequivalence of microcanonical (MCE) and canonical (CE) ensembles Temperature discontinuity in MCE Dynamics Breaking of ergodicity in microcanonical ensemble Slow dynamics, diverging relaxation time

  13. S Some general considerations Negative specific heat in microcanonical ensemble of non-additive systems. Antonov (1962); Lynden-Bell & Wood (1968); Thirring (1970), Thirring & Posch coexistence region in systems with short range interactions E0 = xE1 +(1-x)E2 S0 = xS1 +(1-x)S2 hence S is concave and the microcanonical specific heat is non-negative

  14. On the other hand in systems with long range interactions (non-additive), in the region E1<E<E2 E0 = xE1 +(1-x)E2 S0 xS1 +(1-x)S2 S The entropy may thus follow the homogeneous system curve, the entropy is not concave. and the microcanonical specific heat becomes negative. compared with canonical ensemble where

  15. Ising model with long and short range interactions. d=1 dimensional geometry, ferromagnetic long range interaction J>0 The model has been analyzed within the canonical ensemble Nagel (1970), Kardar (1983)

  16. Canonical (T,K) phase diagram

  17. U/2 (+) segments U/2 (-) segments Microcanonical analysis Mukamel, Ruffo, Schreiber (2005); Barre, Mukamel, Ruffo (2001) U = number of broken bonds in a configuration Number of microstates:

  18. Maximize to get s=S/N , =E/N , m=M/N , u=U/N but

  19. canonical microcanonical The two phase diagrams differ in the 1st order region of the canonical diagram Ruffo, Schreiber, Mukamel (2005)

  20. s m discontinuous transition: In a 1st order transition there is a discontinuity in T, and thus there is a T region which is not accessible.

  21. S E

  22. S In general it is expected that whenever the canonical transition is first order the microcanonical and canonical ensembles differ from each other.

  23. Dynamics Systems with long range interactions exhibit slow relaxation processes. This may result in quasi-stationary states (long lived non-equilibrium states whose relaxation time to the equilibrium state diverges with the system size). Non-additivity may facilitate breaking of ergodicity which could lead to trapping of systems in non- Equilibrium states.

  24. Driven systems Long range correlations in driven systems Conserved variables tend to produce long range correlations. Thermal equilibrium states are independent of the dynamics (e.g. Glauber and Kawasaki dynamics result in the same Boltzmann distribution) Non-equilibrium steady states depend on the dynamics (e.g. conserving or non-conserving) Conserving dynamics in driven, non-equilibrium systems may result in steady states with long range correlations even when the dynamics islocal Can these correlations be viewed as resulting from effective long-range interactions?

  25. ABC model One dimensional driven model with stochastic local dynamics which results in phase separation (long range order) where the steady state can be expressed as a Boltzmann distribution of an effective energy with long-range interactions.

  26. B C A q AB BA 1 q BC CB 1 q CA AC 1 ABC Model dynamics Evans,Kafri, Koduvely, Mukamel PRL 80, 425 (1998) A model with similar features was discussed by Lahiri, Ramaswamy PRL 79, 1150 (1997)

  27. CCCCA ACCCC BBBBC CBBBB AAAAB BAAAA q AB BA 1 q BC CB 1 q CA AC 1 Simple argument: …AACBBBCCAAACBBBCCC… …AABBBCCCAAABBBCCCC… …AAAAABBBBBCCCCCCAA… fast rearrangement slow coarsening The model reaches a phase separated steady state

  28. logarithmically slow coarsening …AAAAABBBBBCCCCCCAA… needs n>2 species to have phase separation Phase separation takes place for any q (except q=1) Phase separation takes place for any density N , N , N A B C strong phase separation: no fluctuation in the bulk; only at the boundaries. …AAAAAAAAAABBBBBBBBBBBBCCCCCCCCCCC…

  29. A B C Special case The argument presented before is general, independent of densities. For the equal densities case the model has detailed balance for arbitrary q. We will demonstrate that for any microscopic configuration {X} One can define “energy” E({X}) such that the steady state Distribution is

  30. ……AB….. ……BA….. E E+1 ……BC….. ……CB….. E E+1 ……CA….. ……AC….. E E+1 AAAAAABBBBBBCCCCC E=0 With this weight one has: =q =1

  31. A B C This definition of “energy” is possible only for AAAAABBBBBCCCCC AAAABBBBBCCCCCA E E+NB-NC NB = NC Thus such “energy” can be defined only for NA=NB=NC

  32. The current is non-vanishing for finite N. It vanishes only in the limit . Thus no detailed balance in this case. AABBBBCCCAAAAABBBCCCC The rates with which an A particle makes a full circle clockwise And counterclockwise are equal Hence no currents for any N. For the current of A particles satisfies

  33. The model exhibits strong phase separation …AAAAAAAABBBABBBBBBCCCCCCCCCAA… The probability of a particle to be at a distance on the wrong side of the boundary is The width of the boundary layer is -1/lnq

  34. summation over modulo • long range A B C The “energy” E may be written as Local dynamics

  35. Partition sum Excitations near a single interface: AAAAAAABBBBBB P(n)= degeneracy of the excitation with energy n P(0)=1 P(1)=1 P(2)=2 (2, 1+1) P(3)=3 (3, 2+1, 1+1+1) P(4)=5 (4, 3+1, 2+2, 2+1+1, 1+1+1+1) P(n)= no. of partitions of an integer n

  36. The model exhibits a phase transition at for the case of equal densities homogeneous inhomogeneous Weakly asymmetric ABC model effective rescaled “energy” Clincy, Derrida, Evans, PRE 67, 066115 (2003)

  37. Generalized ABC model add vacancies: A , B, C, 0 Dynamics q AB BA 1 q BC CB 1 q CA AC 1 1 X=A,B,C 0X 0X 1 A. Lederhendler, D. Mukamel

  38. q q ABC 000 AB BA 1 1 grand-canonicaldynamics q BC CB 1 q CA AC 1 1 X=A,B,C 0X 0X 1 …A00ACBABCCA00AACBBB00000CCC… ABC 000

  39. For NA=NB=NC: there is detailed balance with respect to The dynamics is local for

  40. continuum version of the model

  41. canonical grand canonical

  42. , T=0.02, Grand canonical

  43. , T=0.02, Canonical – 2nd order transition at

  44. , T=0.02, Grand canonical – 1st order transition

  45. Correlations for both solutions with

  46. Summary Local stochastic dynamics may result in effective long- range interactions in driven systems. This is manifested in the existence of phase transitions in one dimensional driven models. Existence of effective long range interactions can be explicitly demonstrated in the ABC model. The model exhibits phase separation for any drive Phase separation is a result of effective long-range interactions generated by the local dynamics. Inequivalence of ensembles in the driven model.

More Related