Marigold’s Growth Fed with Water Versus Fertilized Formula Cody Threet Wildlife Biology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Marigold s growth fed with water versus fertilized formula cody threet wildlife biology
Download
1 / 12

  • 90 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Marigold’s Growth Fed with Water Versus Fertilized Formula Cody Threet Wildlife Biology. Project Summary. Do plants fed with fertilizer grow better than plants fed with just water? [Objective] Discover which produces a better result through several tests. 

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

Download Presentation

Marigold’s Growth Fed with Water Versus Fertilized Formula Cody Threet Wildlife Biology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Marigold s growth fed with water versus fertilized formula cody threet wildlife biology

Marigold’s Growth Fed with Water Versus Fertilized FormulaCody ThreetWildlife Biology


Project summary

Project Summary

  • Do plants fed with fertilizer grow better than plants fed with just water?

  • [Objective] Discover which produces a better result through several tests. 

  • [Hypothesis] Plants fed with the fertilizer will do better.

  • [Null] There will be no change.

  • [Accomplish] By setting up an experiment testing the two variables.

  • [Outcome] Expect fertilized plants to do better.


Introduction background

Introduction/Background

  • Author: Mikkelsen, Robert L.

  • Journal of Plant Nutrition.

  • The article’s title: Using tobacco by-products as a nitrogen source for container-grown houseplants. August 2003. 26 (8).


Continued

Continued

  • Author Affiliation: Department of Soil Science, North Carolina State University in Raleigh, NC.

  • The experiment was designed to evaluate the use Nicotianatabacum L., which is a by-product of tobacco.

  • Do plants grow better when fed with this by-product than those grown with ordinary water or a liquid feed?


Continued1

Continued

  • The objective is prove or disprove that Nicodtianatobacum L. is better than organic fertilizers.

  • The methods include:

    A)Setting up an experiment with three sets of plants for 8 weeks.

    B) Introducing one set of plants to the Nicotianatobacum L. another to water, and another to organic fertilizer.


Objective hypothesis null

Objective/Hypothesis/Null

  • The proposal is that the miracle grow formula will cause a more accelerated growth rate, more color, and a better bloom than the plant fed with the neutral water formula.

  • The [Null] would be that there was no change in the plants growth between the two.

  • [Objective] Hopefully get a clear result finding if fertilizer makes a difference.


Methods and materials

Methods and Materials


Data configuration

Data Configuration

  • Statistical Test Include:

  • T-test

  • Variance/Mean

  • G-test

  • Water Density Test


Expected result and benefits

Expected Result and Benefits

  • The expected result is the fertilizer will increase the growth and volatility of the plant.

  • The plant would overall be healthier and produce a better result.


Budget

Budget

  • Expenses Include:

  • Miracle Grow Solution

  • Plastic Cups

  • Plant Light

  • Two Containers for solution

  • Around 30 Marigold Seeds

  • Potting soil

  • Pencil, Paper, Word Programs, Computer, ect.

  • Total: Around 100 Dollars.


The end

The End


  • Login