1 / 27

CED Application Reviewer Training

CED Application Reviewer Training. Module 7: Bonus Points June 2012. Module Outline. Module 7 includes: The basis for scoring the Bonus Points criteria Guidance on evaluating each Bonus Points criterion Elimination of a Food Desert Collaborating with Other HFFI Agencies and Programs

jolene
Download Presentation

CED Application Reviewer Training

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CED Application Reviewer Training Module 7: Bonus Points June 2012

  2. Module Outline • Module 7 includes: • The basis for scoring the Bonus Points criteria • Guidance on evaluating each Bonus Points criterion • Elimination of a Food Desert • Collaborating with Other HFFI Agencies and Programs • States and Trust Territories Without Active Projects • Direction on how to score these criteria • Quiz questions to gauge what you’ve learned

  3. CED Application Reviewer Training 7.1: Elimination of a Food Desert

  4. Bonus Points – Elimination of a Food Desert • Basis for scoring: The extent to which the proposed project addresses the lack of access to healthy, nutritious food options; identifies the community as a food desert; and demonstrates how the project will address a food desert need (i.e. greater community access to fresh, affordable, nutritious food; improved food infrastructure to facilitate access; enhanced supply chain; etc.) • 10 points possible • Discussed on p. 45 of FOA

  5. Bonus Points – Elimination of a Food Desert

  6. Bonus Points – Elimination of a Food Desert

  7. Bonus Points – Elimination of a Food Desert • Narrative question: Does the application show that the project will serve a food desert community that could benefit from a CED-HFFI funded project?

  8. Bonus Points – Elimination of a Food Desert • Points Available: • Scoring Guidelines: • 0 points = Application demonstrates that the project will not serve a food desert community • 5 points = Application demonstrates that the project may serve food a desert community • 10 points = Application demonstrates that the project will serve food a desert community

  9. CED Application Reviewer Training 7.2: Collaborating with Other HFFI Agencies and Programs

  10. Bonus Points – Collaborating with Other HFFI Agencies and Programs • Basis for scoring: The extent to which the application demonstrates evidence that the proposed healthy food access project is either: benefitting directly from funding focused on healthy food access from specified Federal programs; or collaborating with a project that is benefitting directly from funding focused on healthy food access from specified Federal programs. • 5 points possible • Discussed on p. 45 – 46 of FOA

  11. Bonus Points – Collaborating with Other HFFI Agencies and Programs

  12. Bonus Points – Collaborating with Other HFFI Agencies and Programs

  13. Bonus Points – Collaborating with Other HFFI Agencies and Programs

  14. Bonus Points – Collaborating with Other HFFI Agencies and Programs • Narrative question: Does the application show that the project benefits directly from or is collaborating with other HFFI programs or other federal programs listed in the FOA?

  15. Bonus Points – Collaborating with Other HFFI Agencies and Programs • Points Available: • Scoring Guidelines: • 0 points = The proposed project does not directly benefit from or involve collaboration with other HFFI funding streams • 5 points = The proposed project will directly benefit from or involve collaboration with other HFFI funding streams or qualifying programs • Please note: The full range of points cannot be used to score this criterion.

  16. CED Application Reviewer Training 7.3: States and Trust Territories Without Active Grants

  17. Bonus Points – States and Trust Territories Without Active Grants • Basis for scoring: Whether the proposed project will be located in one of the States or Trust Territories that do not have active CED projects. • 5 points possible • Discussed on p. 46 of FOA

  18. Bonus Points – States and Trust Territories Without Active Grants

  19. Bonus Points – States and Trust Territories Without Active Grants

  20. Bonus Points – States and Trust Territories Without Active Grants • Narrative question: Does the application show that the project will be in one of the locations without any active CED grants?

  21. Bonus Points – States and Trust Territories Without Active Grants • Points Available: • Scoring Guidelines: • 0 points = Proposed project will not be located in a state or territory without an active grant • 5 points = Proposed project will be located in a state or territory without an active grant • Please note: The full range of points cannot be used to score this criterion.

  22. Module 7 Wrap-up • What you’ve learned… • The basis for scoring the Bonus Points criteria • Guidance on evaluating each Bonus Points criterion • Direction on how to score these criteria • What’s next? • Self-review quiz for Module 7

  23. Self-Review Quiz • A project proposing to collaborate with which of the following programs would not be eligible for HFFI collaboration bonus points? • New Markets Tax Credit program • Business and Industry Loan Guarantee program • Assets for Independence program • Rural Business Opportunities Grant program

  24. Self-Review Quiz • A project proposing to collaborate with which of the following programs would not be eligible for HFFI collaboration bonus points? • New Markets Tax Credit program • Business and Industry Loan Guarantee program • Assets for Independence program • Rural Business Opportunities Grant program

  25. Self-Review Quiz • Which of the following can be provided to illustrate that the community served by the proposed project is in a food desert? • Lack of access to healthy food options • Patterns of non-healthy food consumption • Poor health of community residents • All of the above

  26. Self-Review Quiz • Which of the following can be provided to illustrate that the community served by the proposed project is in a food desert? • Lack of access to healthy food options • Patterns of non-healthy food consumption • Poor health of community residents • All of the above

  27. Congratulations! • You have successfully completed the CED application reviewer training modules! • We thank you for your time and energy and look forward to working with you throughout the review.

More Related