1 / 8

Where Did Those GBIF Occurrences Come From?

Where Did Those GBIF Occurrences Come From?. Providing Digital Access to NatureServe's Reference Database: Report on a Project in the Early Stages of Design. TDWG 2011 Annual Conference New Orleans, LA Donna J Reynolds Robert A Morris. Filtered Push Project Harvard University.

jlucien
Download Presentation

Where Did Those GBIF Occurrences Come From?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Where Did Those GBIF Occurrences Come From? Providing Digital Access to NatureServe's Reference Database: Report on a Project in the Early Stages of Design TDWG 2011 Annual Conference New Orleans, LA Donna J Reynolds Robert A Morris Filtered Push Project Harvard University

  2. NatureServe Data on GBIF • 759,500+ NatureServe network occurrence records provided to GBIF • Basis of record? • “Personal Communication, Published Report, Unpublished Report (interpreted as Unknown)” • About 540,000 (70%) of them are linked to a citation in NatureServe’s central database. Examples: • Knisley, C. Barry. 2005. Monitoring Cicindela puritana and C. dorsalis dorsalis in Maryland, 2004. Final Report submitted to MD Natural Heritage Program. • Davidson, B. 2002. Field survey form for Botrychium montanum. • Eid, Nancy. Sent in letter about rare plants on Onion Peak, 1998.

  3. Data from NatureServe Network • 35-year history • 61 member programs in the U.S. and Canada, and one or more associated institutions in 13 LAC countries • Locally collected data from U.S. and Canada aggregated into a central database • A common data management software (Biotics 4)

  4. Characterization Natural History Information Ranking Status Information Tracking Distribution Information Biotics Conceptual Data Model • Lineage tracking • Community structure • Standard / non-standard relationships Organism or Community • Concept name • Global, national, state/ province name • Synonyms Taxonomy Scientific Name Nomenclature Information Classification Taxonomic Information Data captured at multiple geographic levels (Global, National, State/Provincial, Local) Reference An information source (e.g., literature citation, field notes, specimen, map, image, web site) Occur within Mapped as Stewardship Location Element Management Current management techniques and programs applied to the element Observations Managed Area A protected land unit May be contained within Element Occurrence (EO) An element at a specific location; generally a delineated species population or ecological community stand Element Group A number of elements with common EO specifications or management information Site A land unit of ecological, scientific, or conservation interest Mapping and ranking guidance EO Specifications Criteria used to define an EO and rate its viability

  5. Reference File • Over 570,000 records • Books, journal articles, unpublished reports, field forms, specimens, personal communications, maps, websites, images • Less than 25% represent published sources (books, articles, etc.) • Most of the “gray literature” is still on paper in natural heritage program offices

  6. The Project Proposal Evaluate the usefulness and feasibility of exposing metadata and selected attributes from NatureServe’s reference database on the web

  7. Goals • Contribute to improving access to gray literature by ‘publicizing’ its existence • Occurrence references • Documentation on conservation status, local phenology, ecosystem composition and changes over time, etc. • Ultimately, provide digital access to nonsensitive unpublished literature

  8. Challenges • NatureServe is not the owner of the data • Current data sharing agreements with our affiliated programs that specify how data may be used do not address the reference data • Reference records may contain sensitive information (e.g., notes about the location of an endangered species) • Can this concern can be addressed simply by excluding certain attributes? • Resources! • Seeking partners interested in the same goals

More Related