1 / 11

Joep Loos , Manfred Birk, Georg Wagner

New multispectrum fitting software used at DLR for analysis of laboratory Fourier-Transform molecular spectra. Joep Loos , Manfred Birk, Georg Wagner German Aerospace Center , Remote Sensing Technology Institute. Absorption cross sections or line-by-line data?. H igh measurement effort

jewel
Download Presentation

Joep Loos , Manfred Birk, Georg Wagner

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. > 13th International HITRAN Conference > J. Loos • New multispectrum fitting software used at DLR > June 24, 2014 New multispectrum fitting software used at DLRfor analysis of laboratory Fourier-Transform molecular spectra Joep Loos, Manfred Birk, Georg Wagner German Aerospace Center, Remote Sensing Technology Institute

  2. > 13th International HITRAN Conference > J. Loos • New multispectrum fitting software used at DLR > June 24, 2014 Absorption cross sections or line-by-line data? • High measurementeffort • Higher resolutionnecessary • Low analysiseffort • Onlyinterpolation •  e.g. HFCs, CFCs • Baseline lesscritical • Lessmeasurementsneeded • Extrapolation possible (tosomeextent) • Low linedensity • Error parametrizationaccessible •  e.g. CO, NO, H2O

  3. > 13th International HITRAN Conference > J. Loos • New multispectrum fitting software used at DLR > June 24, 2014 Whymultispectralfitting? „Classical“ analysis: singlespectrumfitting FitMAS, LINEFIT, toolby MB/GW, … Multispectralanalysis • Computationally extensive • Quality assessmentdifficult: onlyspectralresiduals • Data reductionmodelhastobeknown • decorrelatesvariousparameters • opaqueandblendedlinescanbefitted • Computationallyinexpensive • Quality assessmentaccessible: •  Chi-Test, filecuts • Test ofdatareductionmodelpossible • Error covariances lost

  4. > 13th International HITRAN Conference > J. Loos • New multispectrum fitting software used at DLR > June 24, 2014 Multispectrumvssinglespectrumfitting • Single spectrum fitting + consecutive data reduction = sound method for generation of spectroscopic data • Complexity and computation time requirements restrict multispectral fit to small spectral intervals • Temperature and number density fit requires large spectral range  restricted to single spectrum fits • Multispectrum fit yields higher precision in many cases • Multispectrum fit can give higher accuracy in some cases • Multispectrum fit enables fitting of parameters not accessible to single spectral analysis e.g. speed-dependence  Fusion of multispectrum and single spectrum fit to combine advantages

  5. > 13th International HITRAN Conference > J. Loos • New multispectrum fitting software used at DLR > June 24, 2014 What can the new software do? Filecut • Line models • Voigt • Speed-dependentVoigt (C. Boone) • Speed-dependentGalatry + LM (F. Hase) • pCqSDHC + LM (Ngo, Tran) • Humlicekby Kuntz & Ruytenfor Boone and Tran • Versatile interactivemode • Choice oflinemodel, fitparameters • ILS, calibrationfactors, baseline, channelling, … • Automaticmode • Microwindow-, spectra-, fitparameterselection (Voigt) • Chi-test ofspectralresiduals • Residuaanalysissimilarto MIPAS/ENVISAT REC analsisbyAnuDudhiaplanned • Single spectrumfitting • Temperature/numberdensity fit • Filecuts(resultsof single-spectra-fits vs. ms-fit) • Identificationofsystematicspectrum-specificerrors • Identification/preventionofcorrelationbetweenfittedparameters • Identificationofsourceofinformation

  6. > 13th International HITRAN Conference > J. Loos • New multispectrum fitting software used at DLR > June 24, 2014 How does it look like?

  7. > 13th International HITRAN Conference > J. Loos • New multispectrum fitting software used at DLR > June 24, 2014 Example: Speed-dependentanalysisof H2O n2 band

  8. > 13th International HITRAN Conference > J. Loos • New multispectrum fitting software used at DLR > June 24, 2014 Example: Speed-dependentanalysisof H2O n2 band • Voigt: w-shapedresidualsfor non-opaquelines • Voigt: line-wingresidualsforopaquelines • Fittedbroadeningparameterssystemitically larger whenfittedwith SDV •  Opaquelinesaremodelledtoonarrow • Influenceofnarrowing larger whenbroadeningparameterlower (higher J)

  9. > 13th International HITRAN Conference > J. Loos • New multispectrum fitting software used at DLR > June 24, 2014 Example: Line mixingof N2O n3 band

  10. > 13th International HITRAN Conference > J. Loos • New multispectrum fitting software used at DLR > June 24, 2014 Example: Line mixingof N2O n3 band

  11. > 13th International HITRAN Conference > J. Loos • New multispectrum fitting software used at DLR > June 24, 2014 Concludingremarks • Multispectral analysis essential when using line profiles of high complexity and various parameters • IDL fitting tool combining advantages of single and multispectrum fit has been developed • Several line models • Interactive and automatic mode • Additional information for quality assessment (parameter correlation matrix, information content, filecuts) • H2O n2 band reanalyzed • Speed-dependence of broadening parameter has to be considered • Opaque and non-opaque lines fitted simultaneously • Systematically larger broadening parameters than HITRAN • N2O n3 band • High SNR measurements • Speed-dependence and line mixing have to be considered

More Related