1 / 11

English Language Learners, Learning Disabilities, & Overrepresentation: A Multiple Level Analysis

English Language Learners, Learning Disabilities, & Overrepresentation: A Multiple Level Analysis. Robert Rueda University of Southern California Michelle Windmueller California State University, Los Angeles. NCRESST Research Conference on English Language Learners Struggling

jess
Download Presentation

English Language Learners, Learning Disabilities, & Overrepresentation: A Multiple Level Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. English Language Learners, Learning Disabilities, & Overrepresentation: A Multiple Level Analysis Robert Rueda University of Southern California Michelle Windmueller California State University, Los Angeles NCRESST Research Conference on English Language Learners Struggling To Learn: Emergent Research on Linguistic Differences and Learning Disabilities, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, November 2004

  2. Background • 3 “big issues” in special ed*: • Continued use of discrepancy model and need for better identification models • Continued debate over programmatic issues (e.g., inclusion v. self-contained) • Overrepresentation of certain groups especially in LD category *Hallaghan, D.P., & Mock, D.R. (2003). A brief history of the field of learning disabilities. In HlL. Swanson, K.R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds). Handbook of learning disabilities. (pp. 16-29. New York: The Guilford Press.

  3. Unpacking Overrepresentation • Early work (Mercer, 1973; National Research Council, 1982) – Latino & African American students in classes for mild retardation • Much work over last two decades documenting the same issue • Changes: more diversity in schools; distribution of students in different categories; legislation and policy changes (school reform, English-only, accountability, reading initiatives, mandated curricula) • Most recent National Research Council (2002) report

  4. NRC (2002) • Controversy about indicators (% difference, risk index, composition index, odds ratio) • Problems in national databases • Lack of precision in definitions • Lack of consistency in definitions over time and place • Inaccuracy of self-report data • State to state variations

  5. General Findings • “Epidemic” increase for all racial/ethnic groups in LD category • African American have slightly higher rate of placement, Latinos slightly lower than Whites (aggregated data across 12 categories) • No evidence of overrepresentation for any single racial/ethnic group across all categories

  6. Unpacking the Data • Other findings suggest that overrepresentation is more problematic when large aggregate data sets are unpacked • > minority numbers in a district = > representation • > the ed. program, > the disproportion • Specific disability and ethnic/racial group variability when examined closely (Artiles & Trent, 1994) • District SES is related to placement patterns (low SES district = > LD and ED placement) (Oswald et al, 1998, 2000) • Grade level, language placement, and English language proficiency matter (Artiles, Rueda, Salazar, & Higareda, 2002, in press)

  7. Explanations? • NRC (2002) suggested 2 hypotheses: • Systematic Bias Hypothesis • Achievement Difference Hypothesis • We suggest a third alternative: • Misalignment/Imbalance Hypothesis

  8. How Does It Work? • Draws on sociocultural analyses of learning & development, in particular recent extensions by Rogoff and others • 3 Planes of Development • Individual (cognition, motivation, etc.) • Interpersonal (discourse, social, and cultural factors of activity settings and actors as mediators of teaching/learning outcomes) • Community/Institutional (factors such as past & current power relationships among different groups, including how they are embedded in social institutions and perceived and experienced by individuals and their communities – eg, English-only battles, anti-immigrant legislation, SES inequities)

  9. Problems with Existing Efforts • Much work in special ed has focused heavily on individual factors • Much less has considered social organizational factors • Little to none has considered community/ institutional perspectives • Virtually no work considers all three • We argue most current efforts are imbalanced (ie, focus exclusively on one level to the exclusion of the others) or misaligned (factors at one level work against factors at another level) • Moreover, the “holy grail” search for scalable, replicable approaches ignores context – the unique dynamics of local settings and communities

  10. What to Do? • Realize that education is NOT business or medicine – and models derived from them do not generalize • Realize that overrepresentation is best treated as an indicator of underlying problems rather than as an outcome in and of itself • Commit to a cultural value of collecting, unpacking, and acting on relevant data and indicators is essential • Once problems are identified, systematic action research approaches in general are suited to examining local problems and contexts

  11. One Approach • In our paper, we explore a derivative called “gap analysis” – a systematic problem-solving approach from human performance and organizational psychology fields • Involves setting negotiated goals, determining indicators (NOT necessarily test scores), determining gaps between current and desired performance, systematically exploring the causes, and deriving theory-driven and research-based solutions appropriate for this specific context • Mainly used in business, but may have potential to be adapted to educational settings – sensitively!

More Related