1 / 34

Noise or Annoyance?

Noise or Annoyance?. Is actual jet noise a problem? Or is the problem only present in complaints?. Approaches as portrayed by critics…. Actually photographed at the edge of Mather Airport, A300-600F at ~ 150 feet above ground. Sanity Checks:. How does our situation compare with

jersey
Download Presentation

Noise or Annoyance?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Noise or Annoyance? Is actual jet noise a problem? Or is the problem only present in complaints?

  2. Approaches as portrayed by critics… Actually photographed at the edge of Mather Airport, A300-600F at ~ 150 feet above ground

  3. Sanity Checks: How does our situation compare with somewhat similar ones elsewhere? • Objective factors • Subjective factors

  4. Locations of publicly vocalcomplainers

  5. Homeowners reportingno jet noise problem From personal contact while measuring actual noise levels 2 of 2 3 of 3 homeowners contacted at point of Maximum noise in El Dorado Hills

  6. Interwoven Issues • What sound levels do freighter approaches actually produce on the ground? • How much traffic (approaches per day over EDH/Folsom) is there? When? • How will these measures change in the future? • How do complaints about noise relate to actual noise? • What misconceptions are evident in complaints? • How do public agencies affect public perception?

  7. Mather ILS vertical profile

  8. CAMRR 6,500 LDORR 5,000 YOSHE 3,000 Nominal ILS Approach

  9. Nominal ILS Approach EDH East Ridge 4,600 EDH West Ridge 3,900

  10. ILS intercept @ LDORR Plus a burst of afternoon traffic

  11. VFR approach South of US 50

  12. Loudest 2008 freighter approach recorded in WebTrak: Probably about 85 dBA

  13. Approach from south By UPS954 plus other Traffic (week before Christmas)

  14. Approach Usage Data for the week of December 15 through December 22, 2008 -- The week before Christmas, busiest freight week of the year

  15. Approach Noise Exposure Potential Data for the week of December 15 through December 22, 2008 -- The week before Christmas, busiest freight week of the year

  16. OverflightNoise Measurement Measurements on SierraFoot.org use Lmax, the maximum noise level SEL/SENEL – Oakland, Foster City Lmax, Oakland, Foster City SEL/SENEL, EDH West Ridge Lmax, EDH West Ridge

  17. Actual Crossing Altitudes on ILSat Initial Approach FixRescue area, north of Shingle Springs

  18. Actual Crossing Altitudes on ILSat El Dorado Hills west ridge

  19. For comparison: SFO approach at Foster City

  20. For comparison: SFO approach at Foster City

  21. Measured Noise

  22. Measured Noise

  23. Approaches per dayand Noise-Number Indexfor Annoyance

  24. NNI Annoyance & Complaint Rate NNI is the first widely accepted index of annoyance due to exposure to jet noise, adopted by the British more than 40 years ago. Published literature, including documents cited by www.keepthepeace.org, indicate that NNI less than 35 corresponds to insufficient annoyance to produce complaints. Values somewhat above, such as Foster City‘s 46.2, are expected to produce sporadic complaints. This table reports a composite complaint rate for Mather-correlated complaints from Folsom, El Dorado Hills, Rescue, and Shingle Springs. All complaint counts are from the first 7 months of 2008.

  25. Can a single serial complainer dominate complaint statistics? Yes -- Here’s an example from LAX, July 2008:

  26. Serial Complainers & MHR Noise complaint statistics correlated with Mather flights also show highly disparate rates depending on the location of complainers. Average monthly complaints : 45 per Folsom caller, 12 per EDH caller

  27. Serial Complainers & SMF Location-specific complaints also apply to noise attributed to flights to and from Sacramento International Airport. Average monthly complaints: 33 per Folsom caller, 8 per EDH caller

  28. MHR serial complaints by community Complaint percentage distribution for SMF is similar, ± 6% per community

  29. SMF serial complaints by community Complaint percentage distribution for MHR is similar, ± 6% per community

  30. Populace in general Most people in the EDH/Folsom area think we have problems with jets flying too low and too loud. The main exceptions are those who live directly under the ILS approach, who generally indicate no problem exists. The public understanding derives mainly from public dialog and media news coverage. Public agency treatment of the issue as a noise problem has carried strong influence – especially in connection with the City of Folsom‘s law 2007 law suit.

  31. Public discourse and public policydetermine public perception.If public agencies treat something as a problem the public perceives it as a problem.

More Related