1 / 15

National and International Networking Infrastructure and Research

National and International Networking Infrastructure and Research. June 13, 2003 Mari Maeda NSF/CISE/ANIR. Infrastructure that enables: Scientific research Education and training Experimentation and strategic deployment to advance and introduce new networking capability

jena-wall
Download Presentation

National and International Networking Infrastructure and Research

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. National and International Networking Infrastructure and Research June 13, 2003 Mari Maeda NSF/CISE/ANIR

  2. Infrastructure that enables: • Scientific research • Education and training • Experimentation and strategic deployment to advance and introduce new networking capability Infrastructure/Infrastructure-enhancing Investments: • International Networks • High-Performance Network Connections (HPNC) • Optical Networking • Enhanced E2E networking protocols • Middleware • Network-stressing applications, collaborative apps, … • Network Research Testbeds

  3. Advanced Network Infrastructure • What is the objective of the network? • (needs that cannot be served by Internet or other research/education networks) • What community or communities are being served? What research is enabled? • What network performance metrics are used and monitored? • Usage? • What is the use/participation policy? • (some examples: abilene, cenic, bossnet, atdnet)

  4. International Networks (1997-2004) • STAR TAP /STAR LIGHT: Univ of Illinois at Chicago Interconnect point for Abilene, Esnet, DREN, NREN, AMPATH, CA*NET4, SURFnet(Netherlands), NORDUnet, CER, TransPAC/APAN, NaukaNET, Asnet (Taiwan) • TransPAC: Indiana University • Euro-Link: University of Illinois at Chicago; Netherlands, France, Israel, Nordic. • MIRnet/Russia: University of Illinois (NCSA)

  5. Euro-Link • Euro-Link originally DS-3s from STAR TAP to France, Israel, Netherlands and Nordic countries • Today • OC192 to Netherlands • OC48 + OC12 to CERN • (Nordic at OC-3) • (France at OC-3) • (Israel - now uses GEANT) • Summer 2003 • OC192 +OC192 to Netherlands • OC192 + OC12 to DOE • partly carrying Abilene and CAnet4 production transport between Chicago and Amsterdam)

  6. Current TransPAC Network OC-12 POS between Tokyo and Seattle OC-12 ATM between Tokyo and Chicago

  7. Short-term TransPAC Plans • Expand Tokyo-Chicago link (OC-48) • Shift from ATM to POS on Tokyo-Chicago link • Eliminate Tokyo-Seattle link (cost considerations) OC-48

  8. Infrastructure/Infrastructure-enhancing Investments -- beyond raw connectivity and high-speed • International Networks • High-Performance Network Connections (HPNC) • Enhanced E2E networking protocols • Optical Networking • Middleware Research and Deployment • Network-stressing applications • Network Research Testbeds

  9. Traditional VLBI The Very-Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) Technique(with traditional data recording on magnetic tape or disk) • GEODESY • Highest precision (few mm) technique available for global tectonic measurements • Highest spatial and time resolution of Earth’s motion in space for the study of Earth’s interior • Earth-rotation measurements important for military/civilian navigation • Fundamental calibration for GPS constellation within Celestial Ref Frame • ASTRONOMY • Highest resolution technique available to astronomers – tens of microarcseconds • Allows detailed studies of the most distant objects

  10. Scientific Advantages of e-VLBI (real -time) • Bandwidth growth potential for higher sensitivity • VLBI sensitivity (SNR) proportional to square root of Bandwidth resulting in a large increase in number of observable objects(only alternative is bigger antennas – hugely expensive) • e-VLBI bandwidth potential growth far exceeds recording capability(practical recordable data rate limited to ~1 Gbps) • Rapid processing turnaround • Astronomy • Ability to study transient phenomena with feedback to steer observations • Geodesy • Higher-precision measurements for geophysical investigations • Better Earth-orientation predictions, particularly UT1, important for military and civilian navigation

  11. Elements of e-VLBI Development • Phase 1: Develop eVLBI-compatible data system • Mark 5 system development at MIT Haystack Observatory being supported by NRAO, NASA, USNO plus four international partners • Prototypes now deployed in U.S. and Europe • Phase 2: Demonstrate 1 Gbps e-VLBI using Boston-DC link • ~700km link between Haystack Observatory and NASA/GSFC • First e-VLBI experiment achieved ~788Mbps transfer rate • Phase 3: Develop adaptive network protocol(ANIR STI grant to Haystack Observatory; collaboration with MIT Lab for Computer Science and MIT Lincoln Laboratory); • New IP-based protocol tailored to operate in shared-network ‘background’ to efficiently using available bandwidth • Demonstrate on national and international networks

  12. Phase 4: Extend e-VLBI to national and global VLBI community

  13. Westford-to-Kashima e-VLBI experiment • Westford/Kashima experiment conducted on 15 Oct 02 • Data recorded on K5 at Kashima and Mark 5 at Westford at 256 Mbps • Files exchanged over Abilene/GEMnet networks • Nominal speed expected to be ~20 Mbps, but achieved <2 Mbps for unknown reasons - investigating • File formats software translated • Correlation on Mark 4 correlator at Haystack and PC Software correlator at Kashima • Nominal fringes obtained • Further experiments are anticipated

  14. Networking Research Testbeds (NRT) • Networks that are designed and built by networking researchers for the purpose of advancing networking research. • Fully controlled experimental environment. • Demonstration of prototype network sw/hw. • Deployment of experimental platform, benchmark suite, tools (traffic generators, configuration and deployment tools) integration with simulation and emulation systems. • Research examples: • -network security (DDOS/worm attack defense) • -wireless networking (MANET benchmarking, sensor networking) • -new generation of optical networking techniques • -overlays (e.g. PLANETLAB)

  15. iGrid 2002September 24-26, 2002, Amsterdam, The Netherlands • 16 countries: Australia, Canada, CERN/Switzerland, France, Finland, Germany, Greece, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, UK, US • Applications demonstrated: art, bioinformatics, chemistry, cosmology, cultural heritage, education, high-definition media streaming, manufacturing medicine, neuroscience, physics, tele-science • Grid technologies demonstrated: Major emphasis on grid middleware, data management grids, data replication grids, visualization grids, teleimmersion grids, data/visualization grids, computational grids, access grids, grid portals • 25Gb transatlantic bandwidth (100Mb/attendee, 250x iGrid2000! ) www.startap.net/igrid2002

More Related