1 / 12

Promotion to Professor (Scale 2) Briefing Sessions September/ October 2019

Join Professor John O'Halloran, Deputy President & Registrar, for briefing sessions on the promotion process to Professor at UCC. Learn about the revised procedure, criteria, and the University's commitment to equality, diversity, and inclusion.

jchristina
Download Presentation

Promotion to Professor (Scale 2) Briefing Sessions September/ October 2019

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Promotion to Professor (Scale 2) Briefing SessionsSeptember/ October 2019 Professor John O’Halloran Deputy President & Registrar

  2. Introduction • Committee to Review Academic Promotions established to revise academic promotion schemes in UCC • Reviewed procedure, process and outcomes • National and international benchmarking exercise • Consultation with various stakeholders • Committee drafted a detailed Report containing its recommendations • Recommendations of the Committee informed the Regulations • Regulations on academic promotions approved by UMTO, AC and GB in December 2018 • Up to 20 promotional posts are available for the 2019/20 call for promotion to Professor (Scale 2)

  3. Two-step online application procedure • Introduction of a two stage process with shortlisting and provision for feedback • Identification of essential criteria at Expression of Interest/ Shortlisting stage • Alignment with the criteria for appointment, and greater consistency and clarity of processes from initial appointment to the University through to progression and promotion • Easing of the burden on an applicant and facilitates career planning for unsuccessful applicants

  4. Equality, Diversity, Inclusion • Commitment to Equality, Diversity, Inclusion • Athena SWAN Action Plan recommendations incorporated: 4.1-1 Gender monitoring - In progression, promotion and retention processes 4.1-10 Gender audit of criteria for key recruitment and progression/promotion processes 4.1-11Require minimum 40% representation of underrepresented gender on promotions boards (UCC uses more inclusive language when describing promotions boards) 4.1-12 Mandatory gender equality training for all promotions board members (SLPB, P(S2)B), and for Heads of Schools managing promotions applications 4.1-13 Revised guidelines on how leave and part-time working is taken into account in progression/ promotion and recruitment decisions

  5. Equality, Diversity, Inclusion • Auditing and revision of the promotional criteria with consideration of Athena Swan best practice • Provision to allow for inclusion of Statutory Leave using the Promotion Scheme Leave Form • Promotions Boards to reflect diversity within the academic community Gender Taskforce Equality Action Plan recommendations: • Measures in place to encourage female academics to apply for promotion (it is recognised that they are underrepresented) • Gender equality and unconscious bias training for Heads of School • Briefing sessions for ALL academics • Commitment to monitor and report outcomes of each round to UMTO

  6. Enhanced Criteria • Enhanced and expanded criteria under each heading- benchmarked against national and international HEIs • Criteria reflect the breadth and diversity within and across disciplines and variety in outputs; candidates may display their achievements in 3 portfolios which will then be assessed • Significance of leadership and impact which is now provided for and assessed under both Research and Innovation, and Teaching and Learning • A broader conception of Contribution to Academic Citizenship and Engagement (previously Contribution), reflects both the changing nature and role of the academic mission and the strategic importance of engagement for the University and community, both nationally and internationally

  7. Enhanced Criteria • UCC’s commitment to Internationalisation and other strategic goals are reflected in criteria • At Full Application (Stage 2) candidates may now choose how to weight their overall score as follows: either;Teaching and Learning 40%, Research and Innovation 40% and Contribution to Academic Citizenship and Engagement 20%, OR; Teaching and Learning 30%, Research and Innovation 50% and Contribution to Academic Citizenship and Engagement 20% • No scoring until Full Application stage (Stage 2); minimum scores will apply at Stage 2

  8. Enhanced criteria- Clinical and Practice Academics • Criteria to facilitate a pathway to promotion to Professor (Scale 2) for Clinical Academics are now embedded in the revised scheme • Following an extensive consultation process throughout the University, Practice Academics are now provided for through inclusion of criteria developed and embedded under all headings, facilitating a promotional pathway to Senior Lecturer for these ‘non-traditional’ academics

  9. Portfolios required for all 3 headings of criteria • Three portfolios at Full Application stage, to document achievements and to provide supporting evidence for the claims made in the application • These portfolios are; 1. Research and Innovation (maximum 20 pages) 2. Teaching and Learning (maximum 20 pages) 3. Contribution to Academic Citizenship and Engagement (maximum 10 pages)

  10. Promotion in Exceptional Circumstances • Enables the University to respond to strategic needs and exceptional opportunity through retaining staff and avoiding loss of talent through robust provision within all the schemes for promotion in exceptional circumstances (in accordance with normal criteria). • Subject to assessment by the relevant Board and is without prejudice to places to be made available for the next promotion round • Normal criteria and promotions process will apply

  11. Other Changes • Change in composition of the promotions boards, e.g. GB appointed members replaced by one nominee (internal or external) of the President • Change in selection process for External Experts/ Reviewers -Less complex to shorten process and make more efficient • Promotion now to take effect one month after approval and signing of recommendation by President • Calls to issue every two years, with the exception of frontloaded calls in 2018/19 (SL completed) and 2019/20 • Enhanced role for Head of School • Competitive process solely- removal of combined benchmarks and marking system • Up to 50% of promotional posts to be allocated equally across the 4 Colleges • Appeals process clarified

  12. THANK YOU!

More Related