1 / 35

AMS 691 Special Topics in Applied Mathematics Lecture 8

AMS 691 Special Topics in Applied Mathematics Lecture 8. James Glimm Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University Brookhaven National Laboratory. Turbulence Theories. Many theories, many papers Last major unsolved problem of classical physics New development

jabir
Download Presentation

AMS 691 Special Topics in Applied Mathematics Lecture 8

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. AMS 691Special Topics in Applied MathematicsLecture 8 James Glimm Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University Brookhaven National Laboratory

  2. Turbulence Theories • Many theories, many papers • Last major unsolved problem of classical physics • New development • Large scale computing • Computing in general allows solutions for nonlinear problems • Generally fails for multiscale problems

  3. Multiscale Science • Problems which involve a span of interacting length scales • Easy case: fine scale theory defines coefficients and parameters used by coarse scale theory • Example: viscosity in Navier-Stokes equation, comes from Boltzmann equation, theory of interacting particles, or molecular dynamics, with Newton’s equation for particles and forces between particles

  4. Multiscale • Hard case • Fine scale and coarse scales are coupled • Solution of each affects the other • Generally intractable for computation • Example: • Suppose a grid of 10003 is used for coarse scale part of the problem. • Suppose fine scales are 10 or 100 times smaller • Computational effort increases by factor of 104 or 108 • Cost not feasible • Turbulence is classical example of multiscale science

  5. Origin of Multiscale Science as a Concept • @Article{GliSha97, • author = "J. Glimm and D. H. Sharp", • title = "Multiscale Science", • journal = "SIAM News", • year = "1997", • month = oct, • }

  6. Useful Theories for Turbulence • Large Eddy Simulation (LES) and dynamic Subgrid Scale Models (SGS) • Kolmogorov 41 • PDF convergence in the LES regime • Observed numerically • K41 implies Lp convergence for LES • Renormalization group }

  7. LES and SGS • Based on the idea that effect of small scales on the large ones can be estimated and compensated for. K41

  8. Conceptual framework for convergence studies in turbulence • Stochastic convergence to a Young measure (stochastic PDE) • RNG expansion for unclosed SGS terms • Nonuniqueness of high Re limit and its dependence on numerical algorithms • Existence proofs assuming K41

  9. PDF Convergence • @Article{CheGli10, • author = "G.-Q. Chen and J. Glimm", • title = "{K}olmogorov's Theory of Turbulence and Inviscid Limit of the • {N}avier-{S}tokes equations in ${R}^3$", • year = "2010", • journal = "Commun. Math. Phys.", • note = "Submitted for Publication",

  10. Subgrid models for turbulent flow

  11. The choice of is step 2 of the RNG expansion: selection of parameters for the essential variables. The coefficient multiplies a “model” which is the current length scale observable. (More later)

  12. Idea of PDF Convergence • “In 100 years the mean sea surface temperature will rise by xx degrees C” • “The number of major hurricanes for this season will lie between nnn and NNN” • “The probability of rain tomorrow is xx%”

  13. Convergence of PDFs/CDFs • CDF = Cumulative distribution function = indefinite integral of PDF • PDF tends to be very noisy, distribution is regularized • Apply conventional function space norms to convergence of CDF (distribution functions) • L1, Loo, etc. • PDF/CDF is a microscale observable

  14. Convergence • Strict (mathematical) convergence • Limit as Delta x -> 0 • This involves arbitrarily fine grids • And DNS simulations • Limit is (presumably) a smooth solution, and convergence proceeds to this limit in the usual manner

  15. Young Measure of a Single Simulation • Coarse grain and sample • Coarse grid = block of n4 elementary space time grid blocks. (coarse graining with a factor of n) • All state values within one coarse grid block define an ensemble, i.e., a pdf • Pdf depends on the location of the coarse grid block, thus is space time dependent, i.e. a numerically defined Young measure

  16. W* convergence X = Banach space X* = dual Banach space W* topology for X* is defined by all linear functional in X Closed bounded subsets of X* are w* compact Example: Lp and Lq are dual, 1/p + 1/q = 1 Thus Lp* = Lq Exception: Example: Dual of space of continuous functions is space of Radon measures. W* limit gives a probability measure at each space time point (random variable, or pdf). Actually a pdf is a further assumption, with a density continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure in the state space. Classical (weak) solution: Young measure = delta function (in state space).

  17. Young Measures Consider R4 x Rm = physical space x state space The space of Young measures is Closed bounded subsets are w* compact.

  18. LES convergence • LES convergence describes the nature of the solution while the simulation is still in the LES regime • This means that dissipative forces play essentially no role • Convergence for Euler equations, not NS • As in the K41 theory • As when using SGS models because turbulent SGS transport terms are much larger than the molecular ones • Accordingly the molecular ones can be ignored

  19. LES convergence is a theory of convergence for solutions of the Euler, not the Navier Stokes equations • Mathematically Euler equation convegence is highly intractable, since even with viscosity (DNS convergence, for the Navier Stokes equation), this is one of the famous Millenium problems (worth $1M).

  20. Compare Pdfs:As mesh is refined; as Re changes • w* convergence: multiply by a test function and integrate • Test function depends on x, t and on (random) state variables • L1 norm convergence • Integrate once, the indefinite integral (CDF) is the cumulative distribution function, L1 convergent

  21. Variation of Re and mesh: About 10% effect forL1 norm comparison of joint CDFs for concentration and temperature. Re 3.5x104-6x106 (left); mesh refinement (right)

  22. Two equations, Two TheoriesOne Hypothesis • Hypothesis: assume K41, and an inequality, an upper bound, for the kinetic energy • First equation • Incompressible Navier Stokes equation • Above with passive scalars • Main result • Convergence in Lp, some p to a weak solution (1st case) • Convergence (weak*) as Young’s measures (PDFs) (2nd case)

  23. Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equation (3D)

  24. Definitions • Weak solution • Multiply Navier Stokes equation by test function, integrate by parts, identity must hold. • Lp convergence: in Lp norm • w* convergence for passive scalars chi_i • Chi_i = mass fraction, thus in L_\infty; continuous functions. • Multiply by an element of dual space of bounded continuous functions. Dual space is space of measures. • Resulting inner product should converge after passing to a subsequence • Theorem: Limit is a PDF depending on space and time, ie a measure valued function of space and time. • Theorem: Limit PDF is a solution of NS + passive scalars equation.

  25. RNG = renormalization group Three steps: Integrate from mesh level Mn+1 to level Mn Reset coefficients of “essential terms” = coefficients of turbulent models Rescale so always at a fixed length scale We carry out 1, 2 but not 3.

  26. RNG Fixed Point for LES(with B. Plohr and D. Sharp) Unclosed terms from mesh level n (Reynolds stress, etc.) can be written as mesh level quantities at level n+1, plus an unclosed remainder. This can be repeated at level n+2, etc. and defines the basic RNG map. Fixed point is the full (level n) unclosed term, written as a series, each term (j) of which is closed at mesh level n+j Provides accurate model for unclosed term, but fails to have a definite sign, and so is numerically unstable. This is why models (such as grad U) which are less accurate, but give a definite flux (div grad U) are preferred.

  27. To present the ideas in their simplest manner, we consider the incompressible constant density Euler equation. Consider a mesh division Mn of the periodic unit cube into n3 cells, n on a side. Conventionally, we consider finite differences, formed by cell averages of each term in the equation. The cell average of a spatial derivative becomes an average over cell faces, for the flux terms F(U). For nonlinear terms the F and the average do not commute, and the subgrid scale terms are just the differences, which are unclosed terms added to the equations. This term for the momentum equation is called the Reynolds stress. In its simplest form (incompressible constant density), the Reynolds stress is a 2-point velocity correlation function, defined relative to a local spatial average. The RNG integration step

  28. Reynolds stress in 2 space V = <v> + v’ = veven + vodd <vv> = <v> <v> + <v’ v’> (cross terms cancel) R = <vv> - <v> <v> = <v’ v’> = <v(1-Peven)v>

  29. R = Reynolds stress R = <v v>-<v> <v> where <…> is an average over a face of the grid Mn. We embed Mn in the once refined grid Mn+1, and on faces, we introduce the projection operators I = En+1 + Fn+1 onto Mn+1 functions which are constant on Mn cell faces and those with mean zero on Mn cell faces. In this notation, R = <vFn+1v>.

  30. We iterate this construction, starting from Mn+2, and substitute I = En+2 + Fn+2 into the formula for R. R = <vFn+1v> = <vFn+1En+2v> + <vFn+1Fn+2> The result is a term closed on Mn+2 and a remainder. We continue and expand the remainder, obtaining a closed form expansion.

  31. Assume convergence of the expansion. The remainder, tending to zero, is the Reynolds stress observed at a small (zero) scale. The turbulent viscosity, observed at a small scale, is the magnitude of the Reynolds stress at this scale, and is vanishing as the scale length goes to zero (for the Euler equation). Thus the bare coefficient of turbulent viscosity is zero.

  32. The convergence assumption does not apply to the Young measure solutions of DeLellis and Szelklyhidi. Thus we do not know if the D-S solutions have zero bare turbulent diffusion. Zero bare turbulent diffusion is related to K41. While there is little scientific doubt concerning the validity of K41 (except perhaps for a modification of the exponent to yield intermittency), we do not know if K41 is (only) a statement of physics, and describes a subclass of solutions of the NS equations, or (say as an upper bound with the -5/3 decay law as an upper bound, to give membership in a positive index Sobolev space) this property is a mathematical property of the NS solutions, and is universally valid as mathematics. Alternately stated, are the D-S solutions actually classical weak solutions (Young measures with delta function fluctuations)? Caveats and questions

  33. RNG expansion at leading order Leading order term is Leonard stress, used in the derivation of dynamic SGS. Coeff x Model = Leonard stress Coefficient is defined by theoretical analysis from equation and from model. Choice of the SGS model is only allowed variation.

  34. Nonuniqueness of limit • Deviation of RT alpha for ILES simulations from experimental values (100% effect) • Dependence of RT alpha on different ILES algorrithm(50% effect) • Experimental variation in RT alpha (20% effect) • Dependence of RT alpha on experimental initial conditions (5-30% effect) • Dependence of RT alpha on transport coefficients (5% effect) • Quote from Honein-Moin (2005): • “results from MILES approach to LES are found to depend strongly on scheme parameters and mesh size”

  35. Numerical truncation error as an SGS term Unclosed terms = O( )2 Model = X strain matrix = Smagorinsky applied locally in space time. Numerical truncation error = O( ) [Assume first order algorithm near steep gradients.] For large , O( ) = O( )2 So formally, truncation error contributes as a closure term. This is the conceptual basis of ILES algorithms. Large Re limit is sensitive to closure, hence to algorithm. FT/LES/SGS minimizes numerical diffusion, minimizes influence of algorithm on large Re limit.

More Related