Brad winters md may 6 2014
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 31

Brad Winters, MD May 6 , 2014 PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 47 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

SUSP Sustainability Phase: Learning From Defects Through Sensemaking. Brad Winters, MD May 6 , 2014. Quick Administrative Announcements. You need to dial into the conference line: Dial in Number:1-800-311-9401 Passcode: 8376 Webinar URL: https://connect.johnshopkins.edu/r33npeupiig/

Download Presentation

Brad Winters, MD May 6 , 2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Brad winters md may 6 2014

SUSP Sustainability Phase:

Learning From Defects Through Sensemaking

Brad Winters, MD

May 6, 2014


Brad winters md may 6 2014

Quick Administrative Announcements

  • You need to dial into the conference line:

    • Dial in Number:1-800-311-9401

    • Passcode: 8376

    • Webinar URL:https://connect.johnshopkins.edu/r33npeupiig/

  • Please contact your Coordinating Entity for a copy of these slides if you have not already received them

  • We will make a recording of this webinar available.

  • We want you to interact with us today. You can:

    • Type comments in the chat box.

    • Or even better, speak up.


Polling question

Polling Question

  • What is your role in your clinical area?

    • Surgeon

    • Quality Improvement practitioner

    • Infection preventionist

    • OR nurse

    • OR technician

    • Anesthesiologist

    • OR manager


Brad winters md may 6 2014

Learning Objectives

  • Describe difference between first-order and second-order problem solving

  • Use the Learning From Defects (LFD) tool to perform second-order problem solving

  • Explain how the LFD tool can be used to drive patient safety and quality improvement efforts

  • Use the four LFD questions to develop and sustain an improvement effort


Polling question1

Polling Question

  • Have you used the Learning from Defects tool?

    -Yes

    -No


Brad winters md may 6 2014

Problem Solving Hierarchy

First-order

Problem Solving

Second-order

Problem Solving

Recovers for one patient, but does not reduce risks for future patients.

Example: You get the supply from another area or you manage without it.

Reduces risks for future patients by improving work processes and increasing compliance.

Example: You create a process to make sure line cart is stocked with necessary equipment.

Activity: Share an example in the chat of common first-order problem solving in your work area.


What is the long term impact on patient safety culture

Problem Solving Goal

What is the long-term impact on patient safety culture?


Brad winters md may 6 2014

What is a Defect?

Anything

you do not

want to happen

again.


Individual mistake or system failing

Individual Mistake or System Failing?

Rather than being the main instigators of an accident, operators tend to be the inheritors of SYSTEM defects. . . . Their part is that of adding the final garnish to a lethal brew that has been long in the cooking.

-- James Reason, Human Error, 1990


Brad winters md may 6 2014

Questions for Each Defect

1

2

3

4

Polling Question: Has your team learned from a defect?


Walk the process

What Happened?

Walk the process

  • Reconstruct the timeline and reenact what happened

  • Dig down to the reasoning and emotions behind actionsand decisions

  • Consider using visualization tools (ie. process mapping, diagrams, sketches or role playing) to break down complex defects and discover where steps go wrong

Tip: Take time to listen. Seek to understand rather than to judge. Ask clarifying questions and follow-up questions.


Brad winters md may 6 2014

What Happened?


Critical to include adaptive teamwork concerns

Why Did It Happen?

Critical to include adaptive teamwork concerns

  • Develop a “system perspective” to see the hidden factors that led to the event

  • List all contributing factors and identify whether they harmed or protected the patient

  • Instrumental in building second-order problem solving skillsnecessary to learn from defects

Tip: Process mapping will uncover workflow issues, but it won’t get at values, attitudes, and beliefs impacting a defect. Thinking about the “people side” of a defect is critical to understanding how to create lasting change.


Brad winters md may 6 2014

How Will You Reduce Risk of Happening Again?

  • Prioritize most important contributing factors and most beneficial interventions

  • Implement principles of safe design

  • Safe design principles apply to both technical tasks and adaptive team work

  • Tip: Take advantage of your diverse team!

  • Senior Executive’s big picture view of the organization and knowledge of resources

  • Team members’ connections throughout organization

  • Frontline staff with particular insight into the defect


Think low barrier high impact matrix

Prioritize Interventions

Think low barrier / high impact matrix

High Impact

Low Impact

Low Barrier

High Barrier


Pick a contributing factor to address first

How Will You Reduce Risk Reoccurring?

Pick a contributing factor to address first


Brad winters md may 6 2014

Principles of Safe Design

Principles Of Safe Design

Standardize Care

Create Independent Checks

Learn From Defects

  • Patient safety is a property of systems.

  • Apply principles to both technical tasks and adaptive teamwork.

  • Teams make wise decisions when input is diverse, independent and encouraged.


Not all interventions are created equal

Building Resiliency into Intervention

Not all interventions are created equal.

Strongest

STRENGTH OF

INTERVENTION

Weakest


Strive for concise clear and relevant messages

Not All Education Is Created Equal Either

Strive for Concise, Clear and Relevant Messages

  • Avoid information overload in all manners of disseminating information

  • Share a concise message with a clear focus relevant to specific audience needs

  • Experiential learning with hands-on approach will be far more effective at motivating change than an automated email dense with data


Brad winters md may 6 2014

How Will You Know Risks Were Reduced?

  • Do staff know about the interventions?

  • Are staff using the interventions as intended?

  • Do staff believe risks were reduced?

  • Data driven metrics should be the goal whenever possible

Tip: Identify ways to measure success. Data is king, however subjective evaluations can provide valuable information. Ask your frontline staff about intervention compliance and effectiveness.


Brad winters md may 6 2014

Share Success Stories

  • Summarize findings and changes over time

    • Hospital Patient Safety Culture Survey (HSOPS)

    • Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ)

  • Share - Provide updates on initiatives, goals and success stories to maintain engagement

  • Share de-identified analysis with others in collaborative (pending institutional approval)

Tip: Make staff safety assessments (refers to asking staff how the next patient will be harmed) available at all times. The team should review feedback on an ongoing basis.


Brad winters md may 6 2014

Sustainability is dependent upon ongoing safety assessment exercises.

HOW DO WE ACHIEVE SUSTAINABILITY?


Patient safety culture requires constant vigilance

Ongoing Key Questions

Your Mantra!

Patient safety culture requires constant vigilance

Poll: Have you asked your frontline staff these questions? How often do you / they answer these questions?


Your team will likely be in many phases simultaneously

What’s Next?

Your team will likely be in many phases simultaneously.


Brad winters md may 6 2014

Executive Exodus and Staff Turnover

CASE STUDY: TURNOVER HAPPENS


Brad winters md may 6 2014

Turnover Happens

  • Personnel turnover impacts all areas of organization

    • Frontline staff and clinicians

    • Executive officers

    • Team members

  • Invite new team members as defects evolve

  • Rotate existing team members as needed

  • CUSP teams need a depth of people with diverse experiences and exposures


Brad winters md may 6 2014

Communicating for Patient Safety

CASE STUDY: RENAL TRANSPLANT


Brad winters md may 6 2014

Case Study: Renal Transplant

Opportunities For Improvement

System Failures

Knowledge, Skills & Competence

Anesthesiology attending not notified of the transfusion. Wrist band checks with stamp plate were not done at multiple points.

Create independent checks, encourage patient safety culture initiatives, add system constraints like barcoding technologies

Stagger staff changes

Formalize hand-offs between departments

UnitEnvironment

Near simultaneous emergent events, change of two different provider groups at same time. No independent check.

Ensure hand-off process supports emergencies

Other Factors

Hospital environment: Transfer across units

Patient characteristics: High acuity

Task characteristics: Blood check-in only as good as existing identity documents.


Brad winters md may 6 2014

Key Takeaways

  • Focus on systems, not people

  • Prioritize

  • Use Safe design principles

  • Go mile deep and inch wide rather than mile wide and inch deep

  • Pilot test

  • Learn from defects on a regular basis

  • Answer the 4 questions


Brad winters md may 6 2014

Action Plan

  • Review the Learning from Defects tool with your team

  • Review a defect in your operating rooms

  • Select one defect per month

  • Consider using in surgical morbidity and mortality conferences

  • Post the stories of reduced risks (with data!!)

  • Share with others


Brad winters md may 6 2014

References

Bagian JP, Lee C, et al. Developing and deploying a patient safety program in a large health care delivery system: you can't fix what you don't know about. Jt Comm J QualImprov 2001;27:522-32.

Pronovost PJ, Holzmueller CG, et al. A practical tool to learn from defects in patient care. JtComm J Qual Patient Saf 2006;32(2):102-108.

Pronovost PJ, Wu Aw, et al. Acute decompensation after removing a central line: practical approaches to increasing safety in the intensive care unit. Ann Int Med 2004;140(12):1025-1033.

Reason J. Human Error. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

Wu AW, Lipshutz AKM, et al. The effectiveness and efficiency of root cause analysis. JAMA 2008;299:685-87.


  • Login