1 / 15

How to write papers: “Materials and Methods” “Results and Discussion”

How to write papers: “Materials and Methods” “Results and Discussion”. Changying Li May 2, 2012. Two golden rules. Write a little bit everyday (no more than 2h/day; but daily) Dirty writing first and then clean the mess (separate drafting from revision). Purpose of a paper.

isla
Download Presentation

How to write papers: “Materials and Methods” “Results and Discussion”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. How to write papers:“Materials and Methods” “Results and Discussion” Changying Li May 2, 2012

  2. Two golden rules • Write a little bit everyday (no more than 2h/day; but daily) • Dirty writing first and then clean the mess (separate drafting from revision)

  3. Purpose of a paper • Scientific papers are for sharing your own original research work with other scientists or for reviewing the research conducted by others. • papers must aim to inform, not impress. They must be highly readable — that is, clear, accurate, and concise. They are more likely to be cited by other scientists if they are helpful rather than cryptic (obscure) or self-centered.

  4. Four components • Introduction • Materials and Methods • Results and Discussion • Conclusion

  5. M&M • Other scientists working in the field would be able to replicate the work. • Although you can cite, it is important to include enough information so that readers are able to evaluate the work being presented without having to refer to another publication. • Often the company (including city and state) that manufactures a particular reagent is specified to reduce any ambiguity about what was used; likewise, the model number for a piece of equipment is often indicated.

  6. M&M • Explain the choice you made in your experiment; what justifies using a given method? What is special, unexpected in your approach • Begin with a topic sentence • Use a table or schematic diagram if possible • Past tense • Passive voice

  7. Example 1: MM • Nature article

  8. Example 2: MM • The imaging unit consists of a zoom lens (F/1.4, f = 17.53 mm) (XNP 14/17-0503B, Schneider Optics, Hauppage, New York, USA), a 14-bit CCD camera with a 1392 x 1040 resolution (ICL-B1410, Imperx Inc., Boca Raton, Florida, USA), and a prism-grating-prism imaging spectrograph (ImSpector V10E, Specim, Oulu, Finland). The CCD camera is in a 1.7 cm (2/3’’) format with a square pixel size of 6.45 μm. The maximum quantum efficiency of the CCD camera is over 90% at 650 nm and 20% at 1000 nm. The camera exposure time was 15.2 ms. A frame grabber with standard Camera Link protocol (Model NI PCI-1426, National Instruments, Austin, Texas, USA) was used to acquire monochromatic images with 65 frames per second sampling rate. The computer used for image acquisition and analysis was a Dell Optiplex PC with Duo Core CPU (3 GHz and 2 GHz) and a random access memory of 3.25 GB (Dell Inc., Austin, Texas, USA). The spectrograph has a nominal spectral resolution of 2.8 nm. Therefore, a 4 x binning was implemented in the spectral dimension of the CCD camera to make the spectral resolution of the CCD camera (2.3 nm/pixel) match with that of the spectrograph. The final hyperspectral image had 1392 pixels in the spatial dimension and 260 pixels in the spectral dimension.

  9. R&D • This section is written around the data (figures, tables) • Convey the message first with a topic sentence • Don’t repeat the information already in tables and figures: reveal the trend, pattern that are invisible or not easy to see • Compare with existing literature • Separate R from D?

  10. Results • Let the data speak for themselves • Authors’ results should be in past tense, and general statements in present tense. • This usually is the shortest section of a manuscript. • Common mistake: repeat what is in the tables/figures: example.

  11. Discussion • Two purposes: • Interpretation of the data • Relate these findings to what other investigators have found (similar to literature review…).

  12. Discussion • Try to present principles, relationships, and generalizations shown by results. • Point out exceptions or any lack of correlation and define unsettled points. Don’t cover up. • Show how your results and interpretations agree with previously published work. • Theoretical implications and possible practical applications

  13. Examples: good and bad

  14. References • R. Day. How to write and publish a scientific paper. • Beth A. Fischer and Michael J. Zigmond. Components of a research article. • Nature Education. How to write papers.

  15. Good luck with your paper writing!

More Related