1 / 22

Assessment of the 12 C(d,p) 13 C cross sections

Assessment of the 12 C(d,p) 13 C cross sections. A. Gurbich Institute of Physics and Power Engineering Obninsk, Russia. Comparison of 12 C(d,p 0 ) 13 C experimental data for 165 . Comparison of the 12 C(d,p 0 ) 13 C experimental data for 150 .

isla
Download Presentation

Assessment of the 12 C(d,p) 13 C cross sections

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Assessment of the 12C(d,p)13C cross sections A. Gurbich Institute of Physics and Power Engineering Obninsk, Russia

  2. Comparison of 12C(d,p0)13C experimental data for 165

  3. Comparison of the 12C(d,p0)13C experimental data for 150

  4. Kokkoris vs Poore [R.V. Poore, P.E. Shearin, D.R. Tilley, R.M. Willamson, Nucl. Phys. A 92(1967) 97] 12C(d,p0)13C

  5. Kokkoris vs Poore[R.V. Poore, P.E. Shearin, D.R. Tilley, R.M. Willamson, Nucl. Phys. A 92 (1967) 97] 12C(d,p0)13C

  6. Kokkoris vs Poore [R.V. Poore, P.E. Shearin, D.R. Tilley, R.M. Willamson, Nucl. Phys. A 92 (1967) 97] 12C(d,p0)13C

  7. Absolute values for the 12C(d,p0)13C cross section at 150○

  8. EXFOR vs IBANDL[E. Kashy, R.R. Perry, J.R. Risser, Phys.Rev. 117 (1960) 1289] 12C(d,p0)13C

  9. Assessment of the 16O(d,p)17O cross sections

  10. Experimental data available for the 16O(d,p1)17O reaction in the energy range from 700 to 1200 keV at 150. Solid points represent the data reported in numerical form

  11. Comparison of Amsel’s data with other results obtained for 150 and 165 G. Amsel, D. Samuel, Anal. Chem. 39 (1967) 1689. G. Amsel, G. Bernager, B. de Gelas, P. Lacombe, J. Appl. Phys. 39 (1968) 2246. G. Amsel, D. David, G. Beranger, P. Boisot, Rev. Phys. Appl. 3 (1968) 373. G. Amsel, J.P. Nadai, E. d’Artemare, D. David, E. Girard, J. Moulin, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 92 (1971) 481.

  12. Angular distribution for the 16O(d,p1)17O reaction at 900 keV [G. Amsel, Ann. Phys. 9 (1964) 197 ]

  13. Comparison of different data for the 16O(d,p1)17O reaction in a wide energy region (Cavallaro’s excitation function was constructed from angular distributions)

  14. The peak in the cross section [Jiang] is shifted by 7 keV and the values are lower both at the plateau and for the peak. The peak to plateau ratio is 2.82 in [Jiang] versus 2.57 in average for the other works.

  15. Comparison of different data sets for the 16O(d,p0)17O reaction

  16. Assessment of the 16O(d,a)14N cross sections

  17. Comparison of the 16O(d,a0)14N experimental data for ~165

  18. Comparison of the 16O(d,a0)14N experimental data for 135

  19. Comparison of the 16O(d,a0)14N experimental data for ~145

  20. EXFOR vs IBANDL[G.Amsel, Thesis, Ann.Phys., v.9 (1964) 297]

More Related