1 / 16

ORCHIDEE’s Evaluation

ORCHIDEE’s Evaluation. Objectives. To gather all the contributions on a wiki page, that may serve to each of you for information on ' who has done what ’ To benefit of these contributions for the development of a ' systematic ' evaluation chain. Session’s plan.

ira-levy
Download Presentation

ORCHIDEE’s Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ORCHIDEE’s Evaluation

  2. Objectives • To gatherall the contributions on a wiki page, thatmay serve to each of you for information on 'who has donewhat’ • To benefit of these contributions for the development of a 'systematic' evaluationchain

  3. Session’s plan • Presentation of the on-going effort towards a systematicevaluationchain • YOUR Contributions • the observation datasetsthatyou use for evaluationpurpose • the variables you are evaluating • the temporal/spatial scale(s) thatyou focus on • whatkind of scores/metricsyouworkwith • and what are the toolsyou have developped

  4. Towards an evaluationchain • Evaluation of a version against • Data • A Referenced version of ORCHIDEE (benchmark) • Both simulations and diagnostics willbefreely and easilyavailable • Simulations available for yourownanalysis • Diagnostics will serve to evaluate the model’s versions and to benchmark them Set of referenced simulations Set of diagnostics Set of scripts

  5. Stepstowards anevaluationchain • To define the set of referenced simulations • To build and version easy-to-use, portable and generictoolsused for evaluation of any version of ORCHIDEE • To produce and distributethe diagnostics - produced by thesetools- thatanyORCHIDEE user can look at, for differenttagged versions of ORCHIDEE

  6. Set-up of the referenced simulations • 3 types of simulation • Forced and Local simulations (FL) • Forced and Global simulations (FG) • Coupled simulations LMDZ-OR (CL) • Activated flags: ok_stomate=y ; fire_disable=n ; ok_routing=y ; land_cover_change=y ; cwrr=y/n • Standard outputs : CMOR, ALMA • Output frequency: daily (except for FL, 30 min)

  7. Forced and Local simulations

  8. Forced and Global simulations

  9. Coupledsimulations LMDz-OR

  10. The Fluxnetchain • Objective: Evaluation of modeled LH, SH, NEE, GPP and TER against in-situ data for different time frequencies • The chainisfullydevelopped, fromlaunching to post-processingsteps. Makes use of 50 sites (150 sites available) • The Fluxnet configuration isversionedwithsvnunder /trunk/ORCHIDEE_OL/FLUXNET • It isdocumented on the wiki, under : /Scripts/FluxnetValidation • Diagnostics are accessible from a dods server : http://www-lscedods.cea.fr/orchidods/FLUXNET And from the wiki Evaluation’s page

  11. The Fluxnet data • A new set of meteorological ORCHIDEE forcing files for in-situ FLUXNET sites (~150 sites) • Data Gaps filledusing ERA-I forcing • Available on the sharedrepositoriesat IPSL from the /IGCM/BC/SRF/OOL/OL2/FLUXNET directory. • For Gaya: /u/rech/psl/rpsl035/ • For Curie: /ccc/work/cont003/dsm/p86ipsl/ • For Obelix: /home/orchidee01/mmancip/ • For Ciclad: /ipslfs/igcmg/    

  12. The Fluxnet diagnostics • Time-series, taylordiagrams for different time-frequencies (hour, day, month, year) • Scripts developed in Ferret, making use of the atlas program (P. Brockman)

  13. Remote-sensed global products • Objective: Evaluation of modeled variables (LAI, water content, …) againstremote-sensed data in terms of variability • A generic Ferret script has been written for generatingcorrelationmapsbetween observation and model outputs (and map of differences of correlationfor 2 versions) • Outputs are accessible from a dods server : http://www-lscedods.cea.fr/orchidods/LAI

  14. Example of a diagnostic generated by the ‘Correlation’ script • Correlationbetweenmodeled LAI and obs. FPAR (MODIS) • Monthly time stepfrom 2000 to 2008 for trunk version 195 and revision r988

  15. Perspectives for the ‘evaluation’ initiative • To conclude on the set of suitable simulations (length, meteorological forcings, PFT map) • To developpredefinedlibigcm-based configurations for the referenced simulation • To develop diagnostic scripts making use of new observation datasets • To define and use sharedrepositories for the observationaldatasets and the produced simulations

  16. Contributions • Jan Polcher / Agnès : Hydrology • Catherine Ottlé: Snow • Camille Risi / Francesca Guglielmo : Isotopes • Fabienne Maignan: Vegetation Index • Ben Poulter: Biomass • Philippe Peylin : [CO2] at stations

More Related