1 / 15

97-0612 Revised MIMO Definition

97-0612 Revised MIMO Definition. Gojko Babic, Arjan Durresi, Raj Jain, Justin Dolske The Ohio State University Contact: Jain@cse.ohio-state.edu http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~jain/. Frame Latency. MIMO = FILO - NFOT NFOT = Normalized Frame Output Time

ilori
Download Presentation

97-0612 Revised MIMO Definition

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 97-0612RevisedMIMO Definition Gojko Babic, Arjan Durresi, Raj Jain, Justin Dolske The Ohio State UniversityContact: Jain@cse.ohio-state.edu http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~jain/

  2. Frame Latency • MIMO = FILO - NFOT • NFOT = Normalized Frame Output Time • Old Definition:NFOT = Frame input time × Output rate/Input Rate • New Definition: NFOT = FILO latency through a zero-delay switch • Initially NFOT = 0 and time t is measured from the arrival of the first bit of the first cell. • For each cell with its first bit arriving at time t NFOT = max{t, NFOT} + CT. • CT = Max{Cell input time, Cell output time}

  3. time First bit of cell arrives First bit of cell transmitted 0 1 2 3 4 First bit of cell transmitted First bit of cell arrives 5 6 7 8 9 Example 1 • Input rate > Output rate • CT = Cell Output Time = 4 • 2nd cell at 5: NFOT = max{5, 4} + 4 = 9

  4. First bit of cell arrives time First bit of cell transmitted 0 1 2 First bit of cell arrives 3 First bit of cell transmitted 4 5 6 7 8 9 Example 2 • Input rate > Output rate • CT = Max{1, 4} = 4 • 2nd Cell arrival at 2: NFOT = max {2, 4} + 4 = 8

  5. time First bit of cell arrives 0 1 2 First bit of cell transmitted 3 4 First bit of cell arrives 5 6 7 First bit of cell transmitted 8 9 10 Example 3 • Input rate < Output rate

  6. Revised MIMO Latency • MIMO Latency = FILO Latency - NFOT • FILO latency = Time between the first bit entry and the last bit exit • NFOT = Nominal Frame Output Time: the time a frame needs to pass through the zero-delay switch, calculated as:Initially NFOT = 0 and time t is measured from the arrival of the first bit of the first cell. For each cell with its first bit arriving at time t NFOT = max{t, NFOT} + CT. • CT = Max{cell input, cell output time}

  7. Key Difference • Zero-Delay Switch: (a) Ours (b) Theirs • Calling “b” a zero-delay switch will make better switches negative delay switches.

  8. 7. Wire • Ours: 5 ms • Theirs: -6.630 ms 1 m long wire, 64 kbps

  9. 6. Cut-Through Switches • Cut Through = A switch that looks at the 5-byte header and starts switching. • At 64 kbps: 5 B = 0.625 ms, 53 B = 6.625 ms Our: 0.625 ms Their: -6 ms

  10. 5. Repeaters Our: 0 ms Their: - 6.625 ms

  11. 4. Multiplexers 32 kbps 64 kbps 32 kbps Our: 0 ms Their: - 6.625 ms

  12. 3. A Network • If their definition does no apply to multiplexers or wires, it will not apply to networks that have only these.

  13. 2. Frame Switches • They define all 1-cell delay switches as zero-delay switches. • Are all 1-frame delay switches also zero-delay switches? • If yes, then what about cut-through frame switches?Most frame switches now a days use cut-through and will have negative delay by their definition. • Their definition does not extend to frame (non-cell) switches. • Why apply a definition that does not apply to other units of information?

  14. 1. No Negative Delay • If you use our definition, no switch can have negative delay • If you use their definition, all our zero delay switches have negative delays by their definition. • All our zero-delay switches are feasible.

  15. Motion • Adopt the text under heading “Proposed Revised Text for Section 3.2.1” of 97-0612 to replace section 3.2.1 of Performance Testing Baseline Text.

More Related