1 / 27

MGMT 276: Statistical Inference in Management Spring , 2013

MGMT 276: Statistical Inference in Management Spring , 2013. Welcome. Statistical Inference in Management. Instructor: Suzanne Delaney, Ph.D. Office: 405 “N” McClelland Hall. Phone: 621-2045. Email: delaney@u.arizona.edu. Office hours: 2:00 – 3:30 Mondays and Fridays and by appointment.

huong
Download Presentation

MGMT 276: Statistical Inference in Management Spring , 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MGMT 276: Statistical Inference in ManagementSpring, 2013 Welcome

  2. Statistical Inference in Management Instructor:Suzanne Delaney, Ph.D. Office:405 “N” McClelland Hall Phone:621-2045 Email:delaney@u.arizona.edu Office hours:2:00 – 3:30Mondays and Fridays and by appointment

  3. Please click in My last name starts with a letter somewhere between A. A – D B. E – L C. M – R D. S – Z Hand in your homework

  4. Please read before our next exam (March 19th) - Chapters 5 - 11 in Lind book - Chapters 10, 11, 12 & 14 in Plous book: Lind Chapter 5: Survey of Probability Concepts Chapter 6: Discrete Probability Distributions Chapter 7: Continuous Probability Distributions Chapter 8: Sampling Methods and CLT Chapter 9: Estimation and Confidence Interval Chapter 10: One sample Tests of Hypothesis Chapter 11: Two sample Tests of Hypothesis Plous Chapter 10: The Representativeness Heuristic Chapter 11: The Availability Heuristic Chapter 12: Probability and Risk Chapter 14: The Perception of Randomness

  5. Exam 2 – Tuesday (3/19/13) Study guide online Bring 2 calculators (remember only simple calculators,we can’t use calculators with programming functions) Bring 2 pencils (with good erasers) Bring ID

  6. Use this as your study guide By the end of lecture today3/5/13 Logic of hypothesis testing Steps for hypothesis testing Levels of significance (Levels of alpha) One-tailed versus Two-tailed test Examples of t-tests

  7. Homework due – Thursday (March 7th) On class website: Please print and complete homework worksheet #12 Confidence intervals and Type I versus Type II Errors

  8. Confidence Interval of 95%Has and alpha of 5%α = .05 Critical z 2.58 Critical z -2.58 Confidence Interval of 99% Has and alpha of 1% α = .01 99% Area in the tails is called alpha Critical z 1.96 Critical z -1.96 95% Critical Z separates rare from common scores 90% Critical z 1.64 Critical z -1.64 Confidence Interval of 90% Has and alpha of 10% α = . 10

  9. Rejecting the null hypothesis • The result is “statistically significant” if: • the observed statistic is larger than the critical statistic (which can be a ‘z” or “t” or “r” or “F” or x2) • observed stat > critical stat If we want to reject the null, we want our t (or z or r or F or x2) to be big!! • the p value is less than 0.05 (which is our alpha) • p < 0.05 If we want to reject the null, we want our “p” to be small!! • we reject the null hypothesis • then we have support for our alternative hypothesis

  10. Deciding whether or not to reject the null hypothesis.05 versus .01 alpha levels What if our observed z = 2.0? How would the critical z change? -1.96 or +1.96 p < 0.05 Yes, Significant difference Reject the null Remember, reject the null if the observed z is bigger than the critical z -2.58 or +2.58 Not a Significant difference Do notReject the null

  11. Deciding whether or not to reject the null hypothesis.05 versus .01 alpha levels What if our observed z = 1.5? How would the critical z change? -1.96 or +1.96 Not a Significant difference Do Not Reject the null Remember, reject the null if the observed z is bigger than the critical z -2.58 or +2.58 Not a Significant difference Do Not Reject the null

  12. Deciding whether or not to reject the null hypothesis.05 versus .01 alpha levels What if our observed z = -3.9? How would the critical z change? -1.96 or +1.96 p < 0.05 Yes, Significant difference Reject the null Remember, reject the null if the observed z is bigger than the critical z -2.58 or +2.58 p < 0.01 Yes, Significant difference Reject the null

  13. Deciding whether or not to reject the null hypothesis.05 versus .01 alpha levels What if our observed z = -2.52? How would the critical z change? -1.96 or +1.96 p < 0.05 Yes, Significant difference Reject the null Remember, reject the null if the observed z is bigger than the critical z -2.58 or +2.58 Not a Significant difference Do notReject the null

  14. One versus two tail test of significance:Comparing different critical scores(but same alpha level – e.g. alpha = 5%) One versus two tailed test of significance 95% 95% 2.5% 5% 2.5% How would the critical z change? Pros and cons…

  15. One versus two tail test of significance5% versus 1% alpha levels How would the critical z change? 2.5% .5% 5% 2.5% 1% .5% -1.64 or +1.64 -1.96 or +1.96 -2.33 or +2.33 -2.58 or +2.58

  16. One versus two tail test of significance5% versus 1% alpha levels What if our observed z = 2.0? How would the critical z change? -1.64 or +1.64 -1.96 or +1.96 Remember, reject the null if the observed z is bigger than the critical z Reject the null Reject the null -2.33 or +2.33 -2.58 or +2.58 Do notReject the null Do notReject the null

  17. One versus two tail test of significance5% versus 1% alpha levels What if our observed z = 1.75? How would the critical z change? -1.64 or +1.64 -1.96 or +1.96 Do not Reject the null Remember, reject the null if the observed z is bigger than the critical z Reject the null -2.33 or +2.33 -2.58 or +2.58 Do notReject the null Do notReject the null

  18. One versus two tail test of significance5% versus 1% alpha levels What if our observed z = 2.45? How would the critical z change? -1.64 or +1.64 -1.96 or +1.96 Remember, reject the null if the observed z is bigger than the critical z Reject the null Reject the null -2.33 or +2.33 -2.58 or +2.58 Do notReject the null Reject the null

  19. Five steps to hypothesis testing Step 1: Identify the research problem (hypothesis) Describe the null and alternative hypotheses Step 2: Decision rule • Alpha level? (α= .05 or .01)? • One or two tailed test? • Balance between Type I versus Type II error • Critical statistic (e.g. z or t or F or r) value? Step 3: Calculations Step 4: Make decision whether or not to reject null hypothesis If observed z (or t) is bigger then critical z (or t) then reject null Step 5: Conclusion - tie findings back in to research problem

  20. Rejecting the null hypothesis • The result is “statistically significant” if: • the observed statistic is larger than the critical statistic • observed stat > critical stat If we want to reject the null, we want our t (or z or r or F or x2) to be big!! • the p value is less than 0.05 (which is our alpha) • p < 0.05 If we want to reject the null, we want our “p” to be small!! • we reject the null hypothesis • then we have support for our alternative hypothesis A note on decision making following procedure versus being right relative to the “TRUTH”

  21. . Type I or type II error? True Ho False Ho You are right! Correct decision You are wrong! Type II error(miss) Do notReject Ho Decision madeby experimenter You are wrong! Type I error(false alarm) You are right! Correct decision Reject Ho Does this airline passenger have a snow globe? • Two ways to be correct: • Say she does have snow globe when she does have snow globe • Say she doesn’t have any when she doesn’t have any • Two ways to be incorrect: • Say she does when she doesn’t (false alarm) • Say she does not have any when she does (miss) What would null hypothesis be? This passenger does not have any snow globe Type I error: Rejecting a true null hypothesis Saying the she does have snow globe when in fact she does not (false alarm) Type II error: Not rejecting a false null hypothesis Saying she does not have snow globe when in fact she does (miss)

  22. . Type I or type II error? Who is taller men or women? What would null hypothesis be? No difference in the height between men and women Type I error: Rejecting a true null hypothesis Saying that there is a difference in height when in fact there is not (false alarm) Type II error: Not rejecting a false null hypothesis Saying there is no difference in height when in fact there is a difference (miss) This is an example of a _____. a. correlation b. t-test c. one-way ANOVA d. two-way ANOVA t-test

  23. . Type I or type II error? Curly versus straight hair – which is more “dateable”? What would null hypothesis be? No difference in the dateability between curly and straight hair Type I error: Rejecting a true null hypothesis Saying that there is a difference in dateability when in fact there is not (false alarm) Type II error: Not rejecting a false null hypothesis Saying there is no difference in dateability when in fact there is a difference (miss) This is an example of a _____. a. correlation b. t-test c. one-way ANOVA d. two-way ANOVA t-test

  24. Writing Assignment Please watch this video describing a series of t-tests What is the independent variable? How many different dependent variables did they use? (They would conduct a different t-test for every dependent variable) http://www.everydayresearchmethods.com/2011/09/curly-or-straight-.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7kfiA2SXMY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4WQhJHGQB4

  25. Writing Assignment Worksheet Design two t-tests http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7kfiA2SXMY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4WQhJHGQB4

  26. Thank you! See you next time!!

More Related