Systemic theories of ipe
Download
1 / 66

Systemic Theories of IPE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 190 Views
  • Updated On :

Systemic Theories of IPE. Lecture 4 – Thursday, 17 September 2009 J A Morrison. Steve Krasner. Robert Keohane. Admin. Did you get my email?. Agenda: Systemic Theories of IPE. The Big IPE Puzzle: Globalization Systemic Theories Interstate Competition Hegemonic Stability Theory

Related searches for Systemic Theories of IPE

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Systemic Theories of IPE' - hung


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Systemic theories of ipe l.jpg

Systemic Theories of IPE

Lecture 4 – Thursday, 17 September 2009J A Morrison

Steve Krasner

Robert Keohane


Admin l.jpg
Admin

  • Did you get my email?


Agenda systemic theories of ipe l.jpg
Agenda: Systemic Theories of IPE

  • The Big IPE Puzzle: Globalization

  • Systemic Theories

  • Interstate Competition

  • Hegemonic Stability Theory

  • Institutions “After Hegemony”

  • Conclusion


Agenda systemic theories of ipe4 l.jpg
Agenda: Systemic Theories of IPE

  • The Big IPE Puzzle: Globalization

  • Systemic Theories

  • Interstate Competition

  • Hegemonic Stability Theory

  • Institutions “After Hegemony”

  • Conclusion



Slide6 l.jpg
Let’s say globalization is the minimization of the influence of space on social, political, and economic outcomes.


Slide7 l.jpg
Clearly, technology is lowering the cost of moving people, products, and capital across space.So, is globalization inevitable?


What do grieco ikenberry ch 1 say about the inevitability of globalization l.jpg
What do Grieco & Ikenberry (Ch 1) say about the inevitability of globalization?


Slide9 l.jpg

In IPE, we might assess the level of globalization by measuring the level of trade, cross-border capital flows, and international migration.


Measures of globalization l.jpg
Measures of Globalization measuring the level of trade, cross-border capital flows, and international migration.

  • Trade: Share of Exports in World Output

    • Peaked in 1913

    • This point was not surpassed until 1970 (G&I, 5)

  • Capital: Flows relative to National Income

    • Level of integration still has not reached the levels achieved among developed countries between 1870 and 1913 (G&I, 217)

  • Migration: Movement relative to World Population

    • More people crossing borders in 1900 than today (Hatton & Williamson, 1998.)



Slide12 l.jpg
Damn. than it is today.


Slide13 l.jpg
Imagine the implications for production costs, product selection, social stability, and even international relations.


Slide14 l.jpg
This raises a vital question: selection, social stability, and even international relations.If globalization isn’t inevitable, then what explains variation in the last century of globalization?


Politics states foreign economic policies mitigated against minimized economic integration l.jpg
selection, social stability, and even international relations.Politics.States’ foreign economic policies mitigated against (minimized) economic integration.


Slide16 l.jpg

Economic models don’t tell us what happens on the ground. selection, social stability, and even international relations.For a variety of reasons—some “good” and some “bad”—policy makers don’t heed the prescriptions of economists.


Slide17 l.jpg

“Neoclassical theory recognizes that trade regulations can . . . be used to correct domestic distortions and to promote infant industries, but these are exceptions or temporary departures from policy conclusions that lead logically to the support of free trade…Historical experience suggests that policy makers are dense, or that the assumptions of the conventional argument are wrong. Free trade has hardly been the norm. Stupidity is not a very interesting analytic category.” (Krasner, 20-21)


Slide18 l.jpg

“[I]n the absence of cooperation, governments will interfere in markets unilaterally in pursuit of what they regard as their own interests, whatever liberal economists may say.” (Keohane, 50)


Slide19 l.jpg

Here’s the point. interfere in markets unilaterally in pursuit of what they regard as their own interests, whatever liberal economists may say.” (Keohane, 50)We can’t understand the development of the global economy without understanding foreign economic policy.That means understanding politics.


Agenda systemic theories of ipe20 l.jpg
Agenda: Systemic Theories of IPE interfere in markets unilaterally in pursuit of what they regard as their own interests, whatever liberal economists may say.” (Keohane, 50)

  • The Big IPE Puzzle: Globalization

  • Systemic Theories

  • Interstate Competition

  • Hegemonic Stability Theory

  • Institutions “After Hegemony”

  • Conclusion


Slide21 l.jpg

Trying to understand the retreat of globalization between 1914 and 1945 is one of the biggest questions in IPE.So-called “structural” and “systemic” theories were among the first attempts to resolve this puzzle.


What are structural systemic theories l.jpg
What are structural/systemic theories? 1914 and 1945 is one of the biggest questions in IPE.


Slide23 l.jpg
Structural/systemic theories 1914 and 1945 is one of the biggest questions in IPE.emphasize the role of structure of the international system in shaping outcomes of interest.


Slide24 l.jpg

Focus is on Waltz’ 3 1914 and 1945 is one of the biggest questions in IPE.rd Image: the level of the international system. This structure is independent of the ideas, institutions, and interests that exist within states.(We’ll look within states next week.)


What defines the structure of the international system l.jpg
What defines the structure of the international system? 1914 and 1945 is one of the biggest questions in IPE.


Key structural elements of international system l.jpg
Key Structural Elements of International System 1914 and 1945 is one of the biggest questions in IPE.

  • Anarchy: the absence of overarching political power

  • The existence of exit-options for market actors

  • The distribution of power among states (see Krasner, 20)

  • The scope and influence of international regimes


Agenda systemic theories of ipe27 l.jpg
Agenda: Systemic Theories of IPE 1914 and 1945 is one of the biggest questions in IPE.

  • Some Key Terms

  • Systemic Theories

  • Interstate Competition

  • Hegemonic Stability Theory

  • Institutions “After Hegemony”

  • Conclusion


Slide28 l.jpg
G&I retell the story (from Doug North and others) about the role of interstate competition in shaping political and economic development.


What s that story l.jpg
What’s that story? role of interstate competition in shaping political and economic development.


Agenda systemic theories of ipe30 l.jpg
Agenda: Systemic Theories of IPE role of interstate competition in shaping political and economic development.

  • Some Key Terms

  • Systemic Theories

  • Interstate Competition

  • Hegemonic Stability Theory

  • Institutions “After Hegemony”

  • Conclusion


Iv hegemonic stability theory l.jpg
IV. HEGEMONIC STABILITY THEORY role of interstate competition in shaping political and economic development.

Overview

The elegance of HST

Krasner’s theory

Testing Krasner


Slide32 l.jpg

Hegemonic Stability Theory (HST) role of interstate competition in shaping political and economic development. is a Systemic theory of international politics (IP):“the openness and stability of the world economy depends on the presence of a hegemonic power that, acting in its own enlightened self-interest, plays the role of organizer and supervisor of the world economy.” (G&I 111)Distribution of Power (IV)  Patterns of Interstate Relations (DV)


Major variants of hst l.jpg
Major Variants of HST role of interstate competition in shaping political and economic development.

  • Kindleberger (1973): Willing hegemon is needed to support international monetary system

  • Krasner (1976): Hegemony brings economic openness (read: free trade)

    • “State Power and the Structure of International Trade.” (1976)

      -- (There are lots more theorists in this tradition!)



Iv hegemonic stability theory35 l.jpg
IV. HEGEMONIC STABILITY THEORY study money in several weeks.

Overview

The elegance of HST

Krasner’s theory

Testing Krasner


Hst is elegant it resolves thomas hobbes old question l.jpg
HST is elegant. study money in several weeks.It resolves Thomas Hobbes’ old question…



Slide38 l.jpg

 A state might use asymmetric costs of closure as leverage against other states(e.g. After opening Canada’s markets, the US could threaten to close the borders if Canada does not support the US in Iraq.)


Slide39 l.jpg

But states exist in anarchy, in a “self-help” system. leverage against other statesAs Hobbes asked, how do we get cooperation without a state authority to enforce agreements?


Slide40 l.jpg

HST provides a potential answer: hegemons serve as a proxy for state authority to reduce the “anarchy.”Hegemons can use both sticks and carrots to open foreign markets.


Iv hegemonic stability theory41 l.jpg
IV. HEGEMONIC STABILITY THEORY for state authority to reduce the “anarchy.”

Overview

The elegance of HST

Krasner’s theory

Testing Krasner


Be sure to get krasner l.jpg
Be sure to “Get” Krasner for state authority to reduce the “anarchy.”

  • Exemplary of Systemic Approach

  • Classic, widely cited article with extraordinary influence

  • Lucid—if not problematic—analysis of IPE (see Keohane, 1997)

    • Notice the explicit discussion of his research design: defines his variables clearly, highlights his operationalization, and discusses all of his findings


Puzzle openness vs social stability l.jpg
Puzzle: Openness vs Social Stability for state authority to reduce the “anarchy.”

  • Policy makers have cross-cutting preferences: power, wealth (income & growth), social stability,

  • Openness brings wealth, choice, and interdependence

  • BUT openness also undermines social stability: inequality, shocks, transition costs (job loss)


Slide44 l.jpg
 Given these cross-cutting preferences, how do policymakers choose the degree of openness they’ll allow?


Who wants what l.jpg
Who wants what? policymakers choose the degree of openness they’ll allow?

  • Small, Developed Economies  Openness

  • Large, Unequally Developed  Closure

  • Hegemonic System  Openness

    • In interest of hegemon

    • Small states have little choice; mine as well get benefits of openness


Krasner hegemony trade l.jpg
Krasner: Hegemony policymakers choose the degree of openness they’ll allow? Trade

“The most important conclusion of this theoretical analysis is that a hegemonic distribution of potential economic power is likely to result in an open trading structure.” 20


Iv hegemonic stability theory47 l.jpg
IV. HEGEMONIC STABILITY THEORY policymakers choose the degree of openness they’ll allow?

Overview

The elegance of HST

Krasner’s theory

Testing Krasner


Now let s operationalize and test the argument l.jpg
Now, let’s operationalize and test the argument. policymakers choose the degree of openness they’ll allow?


The dv economic openness l.jpg
The DV: “Economic Openness” policymakers choose the degree of openness they’ll allow?

“The degree of openness can be described both by the flow of goods and by the policies that are followed by states with respect to trade barriers and international payments.” 24


The iv distribution of potential economic power l.jpg
The IV: Distribution of Potential Economic Power policymakers choose the degree of openness they’ll allow?

Narrower version of “potential power,” “such factors as gross national product, per capita income, geographical position, and size of armed forces.” 28


Testing the argument l.jpg
Testing the Argument policymakers choose the degree of openness they’ll allow?

FAIL

!

!

!


How does krasner amend the argument l.jpg
How does Krasner amend the argument? policymakers choose the degree of openness they’ll allow?


Slide53 l.jpg
Lag the dependent variable: institutional trends are sticky; sometimes it takes a while and/or an exogenous jolt.


Agenda systemic theories of ipe54 l.jpg
Agenda: Systemic Theories of IPE sometimes it takes a while and/or an exogenous jolt.

  • Some Key Terms

  • Systemic Theories

  • Interstate Competition

  • Hegemonic Stability Theory

  • Institutions “After Hegemony”

  • Conclusion


Slide55 l.jpg

Led by Robert Keohane, a group of scholars (sometimes called neoliberal institutionalists) questioned whether it was possible to have openness after hegemony.(Note the title of Keohane’s book!)


Slide56 l.jpg

This followed largely from the recognition that openness has persisted (and expanded!) even as American relative economic power has declined.


What explains this persistence l.jpg
What explains this persistence? persisted (and expanded!) even as American relative economic power has declined.

 International Regimes.


Slide58 l.jpg

International regimes persisted (and expanded!) even as American relative economic power has declined.: "sets of implicit or explicit principles, norms, rules and decision-making procedures around which actors' expectations converge in a given area of international relations. Principles are beliefs of fact, causation, and rectitude. Norms are standards of behavior defined in terms of rights and obligations. Rules are specific prescriptions or proscriptions for action. Decision-making procedures are prevailing practices for making and implementing collective choice” 57


What regimes do l.jpg
What Regimes Do persisted (and expanded!) even as American relative economic power has declined.

  • Define obligations  convergence of expectations

  • Provide information  monitoring & compliance

  • Reduce transaction costs  more likely to cooperate again

  • Ensure “repeated play”  increase importance of reputation

  • Enforcement through denial of “carrots” (and sometimes use of “sticks”)


Agenda systemic theories of ipe60 l.jpg
Agenda: Systemic Theories of IPE persisted (and expanded!) even as American relative economic power has declined.

  • Some Key Terms

  • Systemic Theories

  • Interstate Competition

  • Hegemonic Stability Theory

  • Institutions “After Hegemony”

  • Conclusion


Slide61 l.jpg

So, IPE scholars are particularly interested in the variation in the level of economic integration observed over the last several centuries.That is one of the biggest DVs of interest.


Slide62 l.jpg

Systemic theories variation in the level of economic integration observed over the last several centuries.think that the structure of the international system is the key IV that shapes states’ foreign economic policies—which determine whether globalization occurs.


Slide63 l.jpg

Hegemonic stability theorists (Krasner & Kindleberger) think that the concentration of power in the hands of one state is enough to overcome states’ hesitancies to open markets.


Slide64 l.jpg

Scholars like Robert Keohane (“neoliberal institutionalists”) argue that it is possible to achieve cooperation without hegemony by using international regimes.


Slide65 l.jpg

But does the structure of the international system really explain all of states’ foreign economic policies? What about domestic politics: the institutions, interests, and ideas within states?


Slide66 l.jpg

That’s where we’re headed next time! explain all of states’ foreign economic policies? What about domestic politics: the institutions, interests, and ideas within states?

I can’t wait!


ad