1 / 46

Progress and Challenges

Progress and Challenges. Hertfordshire Children’s Services External Support Team Headline Report – May 2008. Final Report Headlines. Context. Executive Summary. Progress against agreed Indicators. Beyond External Support - Residual Risks. Context. External Support Team.

huls
Download Presentation

Progress and Challenges

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Progress and Challenges Hertfordshire Children’s Services External Support Team Headline Report – May 2008

  2. Final Report Headlines Context Executive Summary Progress against agreed Indicators Beyond External Support - Residual Risks

  3. Context

  4. External Support Team • Children First is a collaboration between Mouchel Management Consultancy and Outcomes UK • Appointed through a competitive process led jointly by Herts CC and DCSF • Requirement from DCSF following inspection and welcomed by Herts • Project ran from Sept 07 until April 2008

  5. External Support Team • GO East chaired - Multi-agency Project Board on behalf of DCSF • CX, DCS and PCT CX on the Project Board • Consultancy Team and Interim Head of Service • Later Interim Chair of HSCB • Diagnostic process/challenge followed by support to implement change and improvement • Outcomes of the diagnostic were accepted by the Project Board as the main areas for the work of the external support team

  6. Context - 2007 JAR Despite improvements made throughout 2006 the key judgements were:

  7. Key Improvement Themes • Safeguarding - this included safe staffing processes and undertaking development work with the HSCB • Interim management of fieldwork services • Performance management • Partnerships

  8. Performance Improvement Aims • Ensure safe staffing processes are robust • Improve operational fieldwork performance in social care – assessment and Looked After Children • Improve data quality and target setting • Improve effectiveness of Children Schools and Families Board and extended board in managing others • Refocus Hertfordshire Safeguarding Children Board

  9. 4 Key Strategic Risk Areas • Leadership and performance management • Integrated Children’s System – In other authorities this has impacted on assessment performance • Accountability Framework • Common Assessment Framework implementation requires agreed thresholds

  10. Executive Summary

  11. Executive Summary • Strong commitment to improve from Members, Officers and Children’s Trust partners – by October provide evidence of changed practice • HCC and partners agreed a Post Inspection Action plan and allocated additional funds • Openness to challenge and support from DCSF, GO East and External Support Team partners - this provides a sound baseline for Hertfordshire CSF as a self improving organisation

  12. Executive Summary • Overall there has been good and rapid improvement in children’s services over the past six months • First milestones are mostly achieved delivering acceptable performance in most areas • Overall the capacity to improve is good if plans are implemented in a timely manner

  13. Executive Summary • Leadership by the DCS and CSF board is now more focused on Performance Management and committed to ensuring greater consistency in management practice and Members can have confidence in this • CSF have developed with a comprehensive Performance Improvement Action plan • Safe staffing processes are in place and working

  14. Executive Summary • Agreed key indicator outcomes of 12 previously judged Red (significantly underperforming) against comparators they are now – • 5 Green – equal to or exceeding comparators • 5 Amber – 4 of which exceeded the March 08 target set but are still below comparators but should be achieved by September 08 if progress is maintained • 2 Red – still in need of significant improvement

  15. Executive Summary • Achieving targets set and agreed for September 2008 will evidence sustainability and consistent performance against comparators • Achieving targets set and agreed for March 2009 will show good performance against comparators

  16. Executive Summary • Strengthening PM corporately will help sustain improvements in CSF • Recognition that all managers need to improve PM – training is a requirement for all - this shows a high level of commitment from DCS and CSF board

  17. Executive Summary • Training must lead to genuine behaviour change • Strengthening PM across partnerships is a continuing need • Systems for managing poor performance need to be consistent and make use of full range of management tools

  18. Executive Summary • Agreement of Local Area Agreement 2 indicators –these show a clear emphasis on vulnerable and there is suitable tie up with the Children and Young Persons Plan • Need to revise Corporate Plan • Current aim by 2009 - work has started following development of the Community Plan • Therefore the new Children’s Services targets are not currently reflected in the Corporate plan

  19. Executive Summary • Agreement for facilitation and development programme for Members • To enable Members to keep pace with the performance management improvements

  20. Key Quantitative Indicators

  21. Initial Assessments

  22. Core Assessments

  23. Progress • More children and families are receiving assessments in Herts than comparator authorities • Timeliness still needs to improve to match comparators some assessments falling just outside timescale • Performance on timeliness for core assessments still variable in teams

  24. LAC Worker Allocation

  25. Progress • Now full CP allocation • Some improvement in qualified LAC allocation • But appropriate worker 100% • Child Protection reviews on time are 100% • De-registration is timely • Re-registrations are lower than other LAs • The rate of BME children on the CPR and in LAC is lower than similar LA’s

  26. Review and Participation

  27. Key Qualitative Indicators

  28. Progress - PM • Performance is discussed more frequently than it was and with greater forensic attention to detail • Middle managers say that they are now more clearly focussed on outcomes and use performance information • Corporate expectations for middle managers’ role in PM set out in paper to SMB on Performance Management

  29. Progress - PM • All members of CSF Board have an agreed data set for which they are held to account • Monthly performance monitoring reports are used by Board to challenge progress • Corporate expectation that a Performance Agreement will be put in place between every member of staff and their manager is a positive step forward

  30. Progress - Safeguarding • Improved number and timeliness of assessments • Secured multi-agency agreement to thresholds and eligibility criteria • Improved the working style and accountability of HSCB and leadership

  31. Progress – Safe Staffing • Comprehensive file review including historical checks • Revised policy and procedures communicated to staff • Staff vetted including redeployed staff • Reducing vacancies for qualified social workers in fieldwork teams but still some way to go • Monthly case meetings to progress “live issues”

  32. Progress – Fieldwork PM • Fieldwork service has made significant improvement in performance management • Confidence in data is significantly improved • Front line and service managers are more consistently using data to monitor performance • Aim to spread this throughout other services

  33. Progress - Partnerships • Trust partnership – has reviewed role and function - plans to recast roles by September • Shadow board established - proposed future link to Exec • HSCB and HCTB Executive developed Compacts • Core Executive – re-focussed on an ECM outcomes based approach and improved partnership working through Outcomes leads

  34. Beyond External Support

  35. What Needs to be Embedded/Sustained? • Full delivery of the Performance management Improvement programme • Performance management training for members, senior leaders and corporate link • Compacts embedded with Partnerships • Need to link performance agreements to appraisal process • Need to integrate and align processes not add more

  36. Residual Risks

  37. Residual Risks

  38. Residual Risks – Actions • Continued drive on operational risk areas • ICS to deliver timely and accurate reports for managers through implementing Business Objects software • CAF implementation and monitor impact of referrals to Social Care by District • Ensure systematic prevention services are developed including Integrated Youth Support

  39. Residual Risks – Action • Complete HR file update – due this month (May) • HR, Members and senior officers need to continue to assist middle leaders and provide confidence so that managers take appropriate action to manage performance • Communicate to staff turnover and outcomes from disciplinary, capability and absence action

  40. Residual Risks – Action on KPI’s • Still to improve - still below comparator authorities • Core and Initial Assessments in time, Reviews on time and Participation, PEPs, Pathway Plans, Health and Dental checks • Implement action plans from Performance Clinics and develop further

  41. October Review – Check Sustainability and Improvement Embedded 3 Phases- • Desktop Review • KPI data against agreed targets • APA Self Assessment • Fieldwork – Focus Groups, Interviews and Observations • Written Report

  42. Proposals for October Review • Review and analyse progress on agreed KPI’s • Identify further evidence of improvement against the agreed qualitative indicators • Check perception of HR support – evidence of changing behaviour of managers and impact on performance • File Health Check on Safe Staffing

  43. Proposals for October Review • Check delivery of performance management improvement plan • Check join up of plans Corporate/LAA/CYPP • Check evidence of children and young people’s input • Look at individual performance agreements to check if priorities go down to individual level

  44. John Harris DCS Hertfordshire Children’s Services Response

  45. Questions and Comments

  46. thank you

More Related