1 / 32

Infant Cereal Program in Nunavut: What Can We do Better?

Infant Cereal Program in Nunavut: What Can We do Better?. Vesselina Petkova, RD Territorial Coordinator, Canada Prenatal Nutrition Program (CPNP). Introduction. No disclosures or conflicts of interest

homer
Download Presentation

Infant Cereal Program in Nunavut: What Can We do Better?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Infant Cereal Program in Nunavut: What Can We do Better? Vesselina Petkova, RD Territorial Coordinator, Canada Prenatal Nutrition Program (CPNP)

  2. Introduction • No disclosures or conflicts of interest • Will discuss process, barriers, and some outcomes related to infant cereal program implementation • Project in progress • Not an example of a perfect program • Sometimes more questions than answers • Share with you and get feedback

  3. What is Iron Deficiency Anemia • When low iron in the system = iron deficiency anemia (IDA) • Ferritin is the measure of body’s iron storage • Low iron store if ferritin < 12 ng/mL • Lack of iron interferes with ability to create haemoglobin (Hg) • Anemia when Hg less than 2 s.d. • Usually when Hg < 110 g / L • Hg responsible for distributing oxygen to tissue, including heart and brain ᐊᐅᐸᖅᑐᑦ ᐊᐅᑦ ᐊᐅᐸᖅᑐᑦ ᐊᐅᑦ ᐊᒡᔭᕐᓯᔨᐅᕗᑦ ᐊᓂᕐᓂᖃᕐᓇᖅᑐᒥᒃ

  4. Why does IDA matter • Negatively affects billions worldwide • Affects cognition, psychomotor development, work productivity and community capacity • High economic burden • Highest costing disease (other than TB) • Generally preventable • Damage caused by IDA can be permanent if not reversed early

  5. Infant Risk factors for IDA include: • Pregnancy outcomes (mothers’ anemic, low birth weight, premature infants) • Rapid growth – infancy (6-24 m.o.) • Nutrition behaviours / poor intake of iron: • Early discontinuation of breastfeeding • Poor nutritional status (food insecurity, low SES) • Low iron formula • Excessive / early cow’s milk intake • Delayed / improper introduction of solids

  6. Is it a problem in Nunavut? • At least 250 cases of anemia in children (0-5) managed and treated annually. • ~ 50 cases per 1000 children/year (~ 5 %) • True burden of the disease? • Vast majority of patients are asymptomatic. • Tip of the iceberg phenomenon

  7. Many more unknown cases? • Population screening provides proper prevalence. • No screening protocol implemented across the Territory. • Prevalence in Igloolik: • 48% had anemia • 28% had IDA - up to 8 x national averages! • 53% depleted iron stores Christofides 2005

  8. Infant Screening in Iqaluit • 6 m.o. - 5 y.o. • 2006 – May 2010 • N = 677, but 1291 readings

  9. 70% of anemia is mild

  10. Anemia by age group Age in Months

  11. Summary Iqaluit Anemia Screening • Prevalence rates are very high • Highest at 8 – 11 months. • If analysis is limited to infants < 24 months, then 42.7% of infants were anemic. • Majority is mild. • But 17% of the children had at least one reading below 100 g/L (moderate anemia)

  12. Venous Draws • Only 53 / 118 (~45%) patients went for venous blood work  to confirm diagnosis • 30% of those who went for blood work did not have a ferritin done to establish iron storage

  13. Infant Cereal Supplementation • Context and Background • Plan • Process • Outcomes and Feedback

  14. Objective: Reduce the Prevalence of IDA in Infants and Children • Step 1: identify IDA as a public health priority • “By 2013, the rate of anemia in infants and toddlers will be halved” • Step 2: commit to a focused strategy in order to address it • IDA program

  15. Nunavut Iron Deficiency Anemia Project Evaluation Strategy 2008

  16. Food-Based Intervention Options Considered ease of implementation, safety profile of a product, cost, and availability. • Fresh meats, including country food • Jarred meats distribution • Infant cereal distribution • Vitamin supplementation

  17. Project Goals • Provide iron-fortified infant cereal to Nunavut infants from 6-12 months of age, in quantity sufficient to meet the Recommended Dietary Allowance of 11 mg/day for iron. • Deliver cereal to infants via collaboration between community-based CPNP projects and Health Centers • Determine if iron-fortified infant cereal is acceptable to mothers and infants.

  18. Implementation 1st phase:2009-2010 • Provision of cereal • Through CPNP community based programs, with support of local Health Centers • 15 communities around Nunavut • Order and distribution of cereal • Partnership with Northwest Company

  19. Cost and Funding • Need: average of 3 boxes per month per child x 6 months • Cost of cereal: ~ $5/box (incl. shipping) • ~ $ 90 per child • Total cost: $60,000 provided by CPNP • CPNP workers’ time and wages not included

  20. Educational information

  21. Evaluation of 1st Phase • Feedback from CPNP workers and mothers who received cereal. • Process: • # of boxes of cereal distributed • # of users & who used cereal • perspective of CPNP workers • Acceptability of cereal

  22. Outcomes • All 15 communities received cereal. • Very few provided detailed information on distribution • Systematic tracking wasn’t implemented • Some workers simply stated – ‘most’ distributed • Also not clear on the number of users • Unexpected issues related to program success such as Heinz recall of unrelated product

  23. CPNP Workers’ Perspective • Most centers found the program easy to administer • A request for ‘not so much paper work’ • Asked to track how many users and how many boxes distributed at a time • “I got it but never opened it… I didn’t know what to do with it”

  24. CPNP Workers’ Perspective • There was a major stress with where to keep the cereal stock • General request for fewer boxes • Knowing there is an expiry date • Feeling responsible for complete distribution

  25. Acceptable to Children? • 50% like, 30% neutral, 20% dislike taste • Some mothers say children won’t eat it • “My child doesn’t like the flavor, can we get flavored?” • 50% of mothers admit to sharing cereal with other members of household • Typically sibling outside age group

  26. Acceptable to Mothers? • 100% mothers support CPNP program to continue • 75% would purchase cereal if available Feedback from CPNP workers: • “some mothers feel uncomfortable taking the cereal… almost implying they were poor and couldn’t afford the cereal” • Felt that some mothers used it but not as the predominant infant food source

  27. Summary • Iron fortified infant cereal is one part of decreasing iron deficiency anemia amongst infants • Program helps with broader goals of food security • Accepted by most mothers and infants • General support for program and its continuation

  28. Next Steps • Fully implement cereal program • In all communities • Integrated in regular CPNP programming • Address barriers (storage, summer break...) • Continue to develop education and communication strategy • Evaluate health outcomes • implementation of screening program

  29. Next Steps • How to better integrate program with health centre? • How to integrate with local store? • Are there locally sustainable options using country food? • What to do with anemia that is NOT iron deficiency?

  30. Thanks to: CPNP community workers Mothers who provided feedback V. Avinashi S. Zlotkin Public Health Nutritionists R. Jetty G. Osborne CPNP

More Related