1 / 37

Core Theme 1

Core Theme 1. WP 1.1. Task 1.1.1: Assessment of millenium-scale simulations and role of external forcing. Compare simulated (signatures of) THC variability on interdecadal to centennial time scales with palaeo-observations from WP1.2 [LOCEAN, MET-O, MPI-M, NERSC]

holden
Download Presentation

Core Theme 1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Core Theme 1

  2. WP 1.1

  3. Task 1.1.1: Assessment of millenium-scale simulations and role of external forcing Compare simulated (signatures of) THC variability on interdecadal to centennial time scales with palaeo-observations from WP1.2 [LOCEAN, MET-O, MPI-M, NERSC] Compare simulated key processes of THC dynamics with observations from CT3[MPI-M] Design a procedure for coordinated model testing [LOCEAN] and apply to the models [IFM-GEOMAR, LOCEAN, MET-O, MPI-M, NERSC] Investigate the role of external forcing on THC variability [MET-O, MPI-M, NERSC, IfM GEOMAR]

  4. WP 1.2 RESULTS - MEAN SORTABLE SILT AT GARDAR DRIFT Reconstructed AMO based On three rings (Gray et al., 2004) Mean Sortable Silt at Gardar drift (this study) Gadar Drift data suggest that basin-wide warm phase is associated with vigorous ISOW flow

  5. Role of processes Monthly mean observed (blue) and modelled (red) Faroe Bank Channel overflow Modeled annual mean Denmark Strait (upper) and FBC (lower) overflow Olsen et al., 2008

  6. Role of processes Modeled annual mean Denmark Strait transport from NCEP forced ocean-only experiment (grey) and assimiltion run with coupled AOGCM (green) Matei et al., in prep.

  7. Internal variability vs. External forcing as a pacemaker for Atlantic multidecadal variability? Otterå et al 2009 …but this finding appears to be model (and forcing) dependent….

  8. Task 1.1.2: THC variability on decadal to centennial time scales Investigate mechanisms responsible for low-frequency THC variability with focus on overflow, deep water formation and its preconditioning [LOCEAN, MET-O, MPI-M, NERSC] Design [MPI-M] sensitivity experiments to investigate the impact of changes in overflow and deep water formation on the THC [LOCEAN, MET-O, MPI-M, NERSC] Assess the role of THC variations on recent changes in North Atlantic heat/fresh water content [MET-O] Design budget and statistical analysis diagnostics [MET-O]and apply to the models [LOCEAN, MET-O, MPI-M, NERSC]

  9. Variability: No consensus among state-of-the-art climate models Power spectra: Maximum Atlantic MOC at 30N, CMIP3 pre-industrial control simulations CSIRO GFDL MPI KCM Courtesy: Jin Ba 100 10 100 10 Period (yr) Period (yr)

  10. Role of overflow variations for MOC Denmark Strait Overflow Transp. and MOC anomalies @ 1085m 3 0 -3 Anomaly (Sv) Jungclaus et al., in prep.

  11. Sensitivity experiment: supress density variations in NS Denmark Strait Overflow Transp. and MOC anomalies @ 1085m 3 0 -3 Anomaly (Sv) Jungclaus et al., in prep.

  12. Task 1.1.3: Ocean-atmosphere feedbacks and climatic impact of THC changes Statistical analysis of lead/lag relationships to investigate the relative role of (un)coupled modes in explaining the low-frequency THC variability [LOCEAN, MET-O, MPI-M, NERSC],aided by sensitivity experiments[LOCEAN, MPI-M, NERSC] Perform partial coupled experiments with focus to identify to which extent the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation is part of a coupled climate mode [LOCEAN, MET-O, MPI-M, NERSC] Investigate the impact of THC changes on European and Arctic climate [LOCEAN, MET-O, MPI-M, NERSC]

  13. Ocean-atmosphere feedbacks Msadek & Frankignoul, 2009 Zhu et al., revised

  14. The WP1.1 model zoo NERSC: Bergen Climate Model (BCM): ARPEGE (T42/L31) + MICOM (2.4°, L35) 700yr long control integration 1400-1999 solar and volcanic forcing 1850-1999 solar, volcanic, GHG and aerosol forcing ensembles for selected periods planned scenario integration • MPI-M: MPI-M Earth System Model (COSMOS) ECHAM5 (T31/L19) + MPI-OM, 3°, L40 + carbon cycle) • 3000yr long control integration • 800-2005 solar, volcanic, land use change, GHG and aerosol forcing (ensemble of 5), • single forcing experiments • alternative solar forcing (ensemble of 3)

  15. The WP1.1 model zoo LOCEAN: IPSLCM4_v2: Atm: 96x71x19, Ocn: 2°x2° 1000yr long control integration 950yr solar and CO2 forcing solar, volcanic and CO2 forcing (running) higher-resolution runs planned: METO: HadCM3 1.25° ocean,L20 5700yr pre-industrial control 1500-2000 „natural 500“, solar, orbital, volcanic aerosol, preindustrial GHG (1750), 1750 land surface 1750:2000: „all250“: as natural 500 + GHG & aerosol emission history, land-use-change, ozone 1860-2000 4 member anthropogenic + natural ensemble

  16. The WP1.1 model zoo IfM GEOMAR: KCM: ECHAM5 (T31/L19) + NEMO 2°x2°/L31) 5000yr long control integration idealized solar forcing runs higher-resolution runs planned IN SUMMARY: All modelling groups have provided long integrations Cross-model validation is going on using >1000 yr control experiments: Overflow characteristics Sub-polar-gyre characteristics AMO vs. AMOC Sea ice variability

  17. WP1.1 summary All modelling groups have provided long integrations Cross-model validation is going on using >1000 yr control experiments: Overflow characteristics Sub-polar-gyre characteristics AMO vs. AMOC Sea ice variability

  18. Things to do Assess similarities and differences in the THC as represented in the various models and millennium-scale reconstructions representation of processes characteristics of internal variability climate response to THC changes THC response to external forcings What causes the differences between the models? Define common analyses tools and prepare publication strategy

  19. WP 1.2: Participants: BCCR and CNRS (Gif-sur-Yvette) Task 1.2.1. Characterize changes in the deep and intermediate return flow of THC; Determine how much it changed, which components, and why. Task 1.2.2. Characterize the upper limb of THC—Variations in the inflows to the Nordic Seas. Task 1.2.3. Characterize climate and thermocline evolution over the last millennium

  20. Variability in ISOW vigor over the last 1300 years and its relationship to climate U. Ninnemann, T.L. Mjell, H. Kleiven and I. Hall,

  21. Linkages to AMOC?How have Nordic Seas overflows varied? Bathymetry of the northern North Atlantic and the Nordic Seas. Location of cores MD03-2664/2665 and ODP 983/MC09 are marked with red dots (Modified from Smith and Sandwell, 1997)

  22. Study Area—ISOW variability on Gardar drift GS06-144-09 MC-D NIIC IR Latitude: 60°19’ N Longitude: 23° 58’ W Depth: 2081 m Curry & Mauritzen, 2005 ~1400 AD Iceland-Scotland Overflow Water (ISOW)

  23. Location in the core of ISOW overflow

  24. WP 1.2 RESULTS - MEAN SORTABLE SILT AT GARDAR DRIFT III I II IV ~1521-1618 AD ~1618-1721 AD ~1820-1937 AD ~1937-1996 AD ~1400-1520 AD ~1721-1820 AD Y= 19.833 – 0.00082278x R= 0.43356

  25. Multidecadal to centennial variability in ISOW vigor and chemical properties over the last ~600+ years ISOW flow variability is coherent across a range of depths and space (not a local signal) During the past ~350 years ISOW vigor is in phase with reconstructed AMO on both inter-decadal and centennial timescale—within the error of our age models. This strong coherence suggests that low frequency variability in key components of AMOC is coupled to basin-wide temperature perturbations Summary of Observations

  26. Eirik sediment drift – DSOW & DWBC variability ~ 2006 AD GS06-144-03MC A Latitude: 57°29’ N Longitude: 48° 37’ W Depth: 3432 m Curry & Mauritzen, 2005 Deep Western Boundary Current (DWBC) ~600 AD

  27. Natural variability in the deep water masses Benthic oxygen isotopes From MD03-2664; 3 pt.smooth (Kleiven et al., in prep) Mann and Jones (2003) NH tmp. reconstructions

  28. WP 1.2.3: Towards the reconstruction of the thermocline variability in the North Atlantic during the last millennium T. Bouinot, E. Cortijo, A. Govin, C. Cléroux LSCE/IPSL (Gif/Yvette, France)

  29. Study sites: sediment cores Already studied Future work SST August

  30. How to reconstruct the thermocline variability? Temperature Planktic foraminifera 1. Globigerinoides ruber 2. Globigerina bulloides Summer mixed layer Seasonal thermocline 1. 2. Permanent thermocline Deep-dwelling foraminifera: 1. Globorotalia inflata 2. Pulleniatina obliquiloculata 1. 2. Water depth

  31. Core MD99-2203 (35°N, 75°W, 620 m) SST August C. Cléroux, PhD thesis

  32. Future work: to better trace the extension of the subtropical & subpolar gyres in the North Atlantic MD03-2674Q (56.4°N, 27.8°W, 2830 m) MD03-2678Q (58.8°N, 26.0°W, 2603 m) From Hatun et al. Science 2005 Subtropical gyre water Subpolar gyre water MD08-3182Q

  33. Deliverables

  34. Deliverables

  35. Summary WP 1.1 All WP 1.1 partners have control integrations of 1000 to 6000 years forced integrations over the millennium are accomplished or ongoing, some forced integrations have been run in ensemble mode analyses focus presently on the assessment of THC characteristics and mechanisms

  36. Summary WP 1.2 WP1.2: reconstructions of the strength of the ISOW over last millennium ready, upper ocean T and S in progress. Reconstruction of integrated overflows south of Greenland as well as upper ocean T, S, and chemical properties in progress New cores (Gadar Drift and Bay of Biscay) give detailled information on the structure of the thermocline Hydrographic reconstructions from the inflow region (Faroe transect and Norwegian Sea ready for the last 400-600 years, will be extended back in time

  37. CT1 and other CTs • Data from WP3 for process understanding: • - Overflow transport timeseries • Watermass characteristics • monthly basis / • Some key data should be put somewhere together, for instance the data from CT1 on overflow transport / overflow overturning • Give information on variability on time scales most relevant for decadal prediction (CT4)

More Related