1 / 131

Emotions

Emotions. and words for them. Advantages of Irrationality. You have an expensive possession, but it would cost you more in lawyer’s fees to recover if it was stolen than it is worth. Advantages of Irrationality. What would a rational actor do? What would an irrational actor do?

hinda
Download Presentation

Emotions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Emotions and words for them

  2. Advantages of Irrationality You have an expensive possession, but it would cost you more in lawyer’s fees to recover if it was stolen than it is worth.

  3. Advantages of Irrationality What would a rational actor do? What would an irrational actor do? Who is better off?

  4. Passions within Reason. Emotions serve as honest, hard-to-fake signals of social commitments. Anger Limerance Shame

  5. Prisoner’s Dilemma

  6. Anger • If you defect, I will make sure that any benefits that you get from defecting will be far outweighed by the costs I will inflict on you, no matter what it costs me.

  7. Shame • I admit that I defected, but I sincerely regret it and I will make amends and never do it again.

  8. Limerance • I am so much in love with you, I would never defect.

  9. Substantive questions: • To what degree are emotions biologically endowed or culturally constructed? • What is the nature of the similarity and difference among cultural emotion systems?

  10. A continuum of positions: • Universalist: Basic human emotions are experienced and expressed largely independently of the individual's culture background (e.g., Ekman 1974; Izard & Buechler 1980). • Candidate basic emotions: • (Ekman 1974): happiness, sadness, anger, fear, surprise, disgust • (Izard and Buechler 1980): interest, joy, surprise, sadness, anger, disgust, contempt, fear, shame/shyness, guilt

  11. Candidate basic emotions: • Izard (1972, 1977): fear, anger, enjoyment, interest, disgust, surprise, shame/shyness, contempt, distress, guilt • Plutchik (1962, 1980a): fear, anger, sadness, joy, acceptance, disgust, anticipation, surprise • Scott (1980): fear, anger, loneliness, pleasure, love, anxiety, curiosity • Epstein (1984): fear, anger, sadness, joy, love • Tomkins (1962, 1963): fear, anger, enjoyment, interest, disgust, surprise, shame, contempt, distress

  12. Candidate basic emotions: • Panksepp (1982): fear, rage, panic, expectancy • Arieti (1970): fear, rage, satisfaction, tension, appetite • Fromme & O'Brien (1982): fear, anger, grief/resignation, joy, elation, satisfaction, shock • Osgood (1966): fear, anger, anxiety-sorrow, joy, quiet pleasure, interest/ expectancy, amazement, boredom, disgust

  13. Candidate basic emotions: • Shaver & Schwartz (1984): fear, anger, sadness, happiness, love • Fehr & Russell (1985): fear, anger, sadness, happiness, love • Sroufe (1979): fear, anger, pleasure

  14. Candidate basic emotions: • Trevarthen (1984): fear, anger, sadness, happiness • Malatesta & Haviland (1982): fear, anger, sadness, joy, interest, pain • Etude (1980): fear, anger, sadness, joy, interest, surprise, distress, shame, shyness, disgust, guilt

  15. A continuum of positions: • Relativist: Individuals from different cultures inhabit incommensurate emotional worlds (e.g., Rosaldo 1984). • lek (Balinese) ≠ shame (English) • schadenfreude (German) ≠ gloating (English) • popokl (Melpa) ≠ anger/frustration (English)

  16. Middle ground: • Distinguish between the inner experience of subjective emotional states (potentially universal) and the conceptual systems by which the emotions are defined and classified (culturally specific) (e.g., Gerber 1985).

  17. False Dichotomy • Emotions are absolutely universally biologically endowed and completely locally culturally constructed. • Differences more rhetorical than real. • Most interesting to explore the nature of the similarity and difference among cultural emotion systems.

  18. Methodological question: • How should we assess the similarity and difference of cultural emotion systems?

  19. Translation: • Focus: • the semantic relationships among a set of emotion terms.

  20. Translation: • Procedure: • Find equivalent sets of emotion terms in two languages. • Ask native speakers to judge the similarity of meanings of the terms. • Assess the degree to which the semantic relationships among the terms are similar for the two languages (e.g., Russell, 1983; Heider, 1991; Romney, Moore, & Rusch, 1997).

  21. Translation: • Translation is a prerequisite of the analysis.

  22. Results of Translation Method • Adequate to show circumplex structure of the emotion space (e.g., Russell, 1983; 1989).

  23. English English

  24. Chinese Chinese

  25. Croatian Croatian

  26. Gujarati Gujarati

  27. Japanese Japanese

  28. Results of Translation Method • Adequate to show circumplex structure of the emotion space (e.g, Russell, 1983; 1989). • Useful to compare patterns of synonomy (e.g., Heider, 1991). • Sufficient to demonstrate that emotion words in one language are not neatly equivalent to emotion words in another language.

  29. Karl Heider, 1991 • Bahasa Minangkabau • Bahasa Indonesia • Javanese

  30. Results of Translation Method • Inadequate to show that speakers of different languages “share a single model of the semantic structure of emotion terms” (e.g., Romney, Moore, & Rusch, 1997).

  31. Romney, Moore, and Rusch

  32. Whorf

  33. Lenneberg’s critique: • If the other language represents a wildly different way of understanding the world, one loses that world view as soon as one has rendered it into English. • The method presumes the answer to the research question itself: The degree of correspondence between emotion systems cannot be assessed if one presumes to know the corresponding terms from the outset.

  34. Translation should be a result of the analysis, not it's first step. • Problem compounded with circumplex spaces like emotion.

  35. Mistranslation can preserve a circumplex semantic structure. original language

  36. Mistranslation can preserve a circumplex semantic structure. translation

  37. Connotation vs denotation • “Just because both God and ice cream are both strong and good, doesn’t mean that they are equivalent.” (Richard Shweder) • Similarity judgment does not get at either reference or meaning.

  38. Mapping: • Focus: • the mapping of emotion terms to a collection of referents.

  39. Mapping: • Procedure: • Present emotionally evocative stimuli to native speakers. • Ask native speakers to identify the emotion expressed in the emotional stimuli. • Assess the degree to which the implied similarity of the stimuli is similar for the two languages. • Similar tactic used in cross-cultural comparison of color classification and ethnobiology.

  40. Mapping: • Translation is a consequence of the analysis.

  41. Male faces

  42. Female faces

  43. Identification task • Present to informants 22 photographs of an actor and an actress expressing emotions selected to evenly sample Russell's circumplex emotion space. • Ask them to give a word or short phrase that best describes how the person is feeling. • Record the responses.

  44. Identification task • Collapse various forms of the same root (e.g., anger = angry; sadness = sad, etc.). • Weed out rare or idiosyncratic responses. • Build a mapping matrix that represents the mapping of terms (rows) to the photographs (columns).

  45. English Mapping Matrix

  46. Shuar Mapping Matrix

  47. Identification task • Correlate the columns of the matrix to infer the similarity of the faces implied by the mapping. • Perform a correspondence analysis of the stacked mapping matrices to see how terms map to the faces.

More Related