1 / 16

CLIC Two-beam Module P rogram

CLIC Two-beam Module P rogram. G. Riddone ( contribution from F. Rossi, I. Kossyvakis, R. Mondello ) May, 24 th. Acknowledgment to the Module WG members. Lab Modules. T1. T0. T0. T4. Tests  . Now . Autumn 2013. 2014. 2015. TBM in the lab169 (typical sequence below)

hinda
Download Presentation

CLIC Two-beam Module P rogram

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CLIC Two-beam ModuleProgram G. Riddone (contribution from F. Rossi, I. Kossyvakis, R. Mondello) May, 24th Acknowledgment to the Module WG members

  2. Lab Modules T1 T0 T0 T4 Tests  Now Autumn 2013 2014 2015 • TBM in the lab169 (typical sequence below) • Aim: validation of the module design (no RF, no beam) • Each technical system (vacuum, alignment, cooling,…) in an integrated approach • Re-positioning of components following power dissipation • Transport test

  3. Lab Modules • Status • 1st module T0 under tests (see next slides) • Different steps defined (according to variation of tunnel air conditions and power dissipation from components). • Cooling system and heating system working as expected. • 2nd module T0 under fabrication/assembly • module T1: main components (e.g. girder, RF structures) under procurement • module T4: girders and DBQ available, note the few components needed

  4. Lab module type 0 Module type 0 assembled in the laboratory B169

  5. Lab modules Entrance of laboratory Electronics Cooling circuit

  6. Lab modules - HVAC system Simulation of the tunnel air condition Latest implementation of the ‘false’ ceiling for improving air flow

  7. Data acquisition and LabVIEW software Data acquisition from the PETS Data acquisition from the accelerating structures Data acquisition from the RF network loads Data acquisition from the compact loads Same cooling circuit as for CLIC: SAS in parallel Data acquisition from the magnets Data acquisition from the waveguides

  8. Data acquisition and LabVIEW software PID controllers for control valves Data acquisition from the air thermocouples

  9. Data acquisition and LabVIEW software Real time plots

  10. Thermal test program #1 Simulation of the power dissipation from main beam and drive beam Several steps defined to understand the influence of the different heating configurations  Parameters which could be varied: air temperature, air speed, water temperature…  Verification of the component alignment after each configuration

  11. Thermal test program #1 #1 - ALL THE TESTS ARE PERFORMED WITH NO VACUUM STEP 1 – Heating environment STEP 0 – Alignment tests STEP 2 – Heating AS + AS loads STEP 4 – Heating all module STEP 3 – Heating PETS + RFN loads + DBQ ENVIRONMENT Tamb = 20 & 40 °C vair = 0.4 & 0.8 m/s in steady-state conditions ENVIRONMENT Tamb = 20 & 40 °C vair = 0.4 & 0.8 m/s in steady-state conditions ENVIRONMENT Tamb = 20 & 40 °C vair = 0.4 & 0.8 m/s in steady-state conditions ENVIRONMENT Tamb = 20, 30 & 40 °C vair= 0 m/s in steady-state conditions • MEASUREMENTS • Temperature • Alignment • Laser tracker • Romer arm • WPS system • MEASUREMENTS • Temperature • Alignment • Laser tracker • WPS system • MEASUREMENTS • Temperature • Alignment • Laser tracker • WPS system • MEASUREMENTS • Temperature • Alignment • Laser tracker • WPS system ENVIRONMENT vair = 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7 & 0.8 m/s MEASUREMENTS WPS system HEATING No active heating in RF structures HEATING Heat power = 50 & 100 % HEATING Heat power = 50 & 100 % HEATING Heat power = 50 & 100 % COOLING No active cooling in RF structures COOLING ∆TSAS = 10 °C @ 100 % heat power ∆TPETS = 15 °C @ 100 % heat power COOLING ∆TSAS = 10 °C @ 100 % heat power COOLING ∆TPETS = 15 °C @ 100 % heat power

  12. Thermal test program #1

  13. Lab Modules • Thermal test programs #1. T0 (no vacuum) [now until Jul 2013] #2. T0-T0 (no vacuum) [Oct 2013] #3. T0-T0 (with vacuum) [Apr 2014] #4. T0-T0-T1… • Reporting • CLIC module WG • Project meeting • Reviews • after test program #2 [T0-T0 / no vacuum] [First session in Nov 2013] • After each test sequence

  14. CLEX Modules beam T1 T0 T0 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 4 Tests in CLEX: 2014 • Sequence/phases below • Aim: validation of the module under accelerator conditions (with beam, with RF) • Address feasibility issues in an integrated approach • Validation of the technical system with beam and RF

  15. CLEX Modules 1st module T0 • Status • 1st module T0 [installation shut-down 2014] • 2D layout defined • RF system: under fabrication, disks at CERN, 1st PETS unit at CERN • Supporting/positioning system: contract to ZTS/Boostec for the 3 modules. Set for 1st module in August. • DBQ: available • 2nd module T0 [assembly from 2014] • RF system: waiting for validation of 1st module T0 (this is the most costly part) • Supporting/positioning system: note the need of validation of interconnection and articulation point before installation in CLEX • module T1 • Supporting/positioning system: see above

  16. Summary • Lab Modules • Components available at CERN or under procurement • Experience from previous modules injected in the design for future modules • Real components allows for a better understanding of the module behavior • T1 lab: a real SAS will be installed (in a second assembly iteration) • Program runs until mid 2015 • T4: no RF structures, girders/Q available • CLEX Modules • Integrated supporting/positioning system under procurement • RF system for 1st module under assembly • RF system for following modules: validation of the first module prior to new call for tender • Reviews • “ Committee” from Nov 2013 for about 1.5 years • Mandate, three action lines to consider, within and agreed resource plan: • Lab: program optimization • CTF3: strategy for 2nd T0 and T1 • Definition of next module generation (based on lab/CLEX results industrialization study, re-baselining) • Main subjects for first review: Lab thermal test and CLEX test preparation

More Related