1 / 40

Just Culture Implementation – Phase 2 Using the Just Culture Algorithm

Just Culture Implementation – Phase 2 Using the Just Culture Algorithm. Stephanie Sobczak and Jill Hanson WHA Quality Improvement Managers. Today’s Call. Implementation –Phase 3 Event Investigation Using the Just Culture Algorithm Case Scenarios. Past 30 Days. The Purpose of the Algorithm.

Download Presentation

Just Culture Implementation – Phase 2 Using the Just Culture Algorithm

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Just CultureImplementation – Phase 2Using the Just Culture Algorithm Stephanie Sobczak and Jill Hanson WHA Quality Improvement Managers

  2. Today’s Call • Implementation –Phase 3 • Event Investigation • Using the Just Culture Algorithm • Case Scenarios

  3. Past 30 Days

  4. The Purpose of the Algorithm

  5. by Alison H. Page, MS, MHA October 2007 “We've all been there...something goes wrong, a patient is harmed, and we, as medical directors, managers, and administrators, are forced to judge the behavioral choices of another human being. Most of the time, we conduct this complex leadership function guided by little more than vague policies, personal beliefs, and intuition.” http://webmm.ahrq.gov/perspective.aspx?perspectiveID=50

  6. by Alison H. Page, MS, MHA October 2007 “Frequently, we are frustrated by the fact that many other providers have made the same mistake or behavioral choice, with no adverse outcome to the patient, and the behavior was overlooked. Quite understandably, the staff is frustrated by what appears to be inconsistent, irrational decision-making by leadership.” http://webmm.ahrq.gov/perspective.aspx?perspectiveID=50

  7. by Alison H. Page, MS, MHA October 2007 “The Just Culture concept teaches us to shift our attention from retrospective judgment of others, focused on the severity of the outcome, to real-time evaluation of behavioral choices in a rational and organized manner.” http://webmm.ahrq.gov/perspective.aspx?perspectiveID=50

  8. Purpose of the Algorithm • To consistently determine the actions taken as a result an investigation. • To provide a mechanism to better understand “near misses” and degree of risk (dissociated from outcome). • To clearly distinguish between Human Error, At-risk Behavior, and Reckless Behavior.

  9. Event Investigation Gathering essential information about an event or situation prior to using the algorithm is key. Managers must be trained to conduct a good investigation of an event. For learning the Just Culture™ Algorithm, scenarios will provide the basic elements from an event investigation.

  10. Common Traps • Guessing or assuming • “I’ve seen this before.” • Not doing an investigation • Not talking to the people involved • Not listening “actively” during discussions • Arriving at a conclusion early (much more on this next month – Training Managers)

  11. Identifying Events We need to understand the details about these two elements

  12. Algorithm Steps 1. Obtain basic event investigation information. 2. Apply Duty to Avoid Causing Unjustifiable Risk or Harm and apply corresponding actions. 3. Apply either: a. Duty to Follow a Procedural Rule and apply corresponding actions. b. Duty to Produce an Outcome and apply corresponding actions. 4. Is the event repetitive? Use Repetitive Human Errors or Repetitive At-Risk Behaviors.

  13. Algorithm Steps 1. Obtain basic event investigation information. 2. Apply Duty to Avoid Causing Unjustifiable Risk or Harm and apply corresponding actions. 3. Apply either: a. Duty to Follow a Procedural Rule and apply corresponding actions. b. Duty to Produce an Outcome and apply corresponding actions. 4. Is the event repetitive? Use Repetitive Human Errors or Repetitive At-Risk Behaviors.

  14. The Three Duties • Putting the organizational interest or value in harms way: • Potential or actual harm to persons • Potential or actual harm to property

  15. Algorithm Steps 1. Obtain basic event investigation information. 2. Apply Duty to Avoid Causing Unjustifiable Risk or Harm and apply corresponding actions. 3. Apply either: a. Duty to Follow a Procedural Rule and apply corresponding actions. b. Duty to Produce an Outcome and apply corresponding actions. 4. Is the event repetitive? Use Repetitive Human Errors or Repetitive At-Risk Behaviors.

  16. Determine duty A rule, process, or procedure is in place specifying how to perform the job. (The system is largely controlled by the employer) The employee knows what the goal is (or the outcome expected) but is not told how to reach the goal or achieve the outcome. (The system is largely controlled by the employee.)

  17. Algorithm Steps 1. Obtain basic event investigation information. 2. Apply Duty to Avoid Causing Unjustifiable Risk or Harm and apply corresponding actions. 3. Apply either: a. Duty to Follow a Procedural Rule and apply corresponding actions. b. Duty to Produce an Outcome and apply corresponding actions. 4. Is the event repetitive? Use Repetitive Human Errors or Repetitive At-Risk Behaviors.

  18. Case Applications using the Just Culture Algorithm

  19. Hand Hygiene

  20. Repetitive At-risk Behaviors

  21. Using the algorithm • You core team should be comfortable using the algorithm: • To learn, consider using your hospital’s previously encountered cases to learn the algorithm. • Try it with your colleagues stories/scenarios • Trial it with new situations.

  22. We can learn from each other • Do you have a case the group can learn from? • How? • Write up a paragraph similar to those we used today • Email it to Jill Hanson • We prefer that you do not identify your facility in the case description, and we will not disclose your facility. • If you wish to speak to the case yourself on a call, please let us know.

  23. Upcoming Months February – Training Managers and Staff March - Event Investigation April – Coaching at risk behaviors * Please contribute your cases

  24. The Next 30 Days

  25. Thank You! Questions? Stephanie Sobczak Jill Hanson

More Related