1 / 10

United States v. Microsoft

Jonathan Huelman. United States v. Microsoft. Monopolies and Trusts. mo·nop·o·ly    [ muh - nop -uh-lee] 1. exclusive control of a commodity or service in a particular market, or a control that makes possible the manipulation of prices. 5. a company or group that has such control.

heaton
Download Presentation

United States v. Microsoft

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Jonathan Huelman United States v. Microsoft

  2. Monopolies and Trusts • mo·nop·o·ly   [muh-nop-uh-lee] • 1. exclusive control of a commodity or service in a particular market, or a control that makes possible the manipulation of prices. • 5. a company or group that has such control.

  3. U.S. Antitrust Law • Sherman Act of 1890 • “The philosophy of the Sherman Act is that it should not exist…” (1948) • Microsoft and OEMs Bundling of Internet Explorer with the Windows OS leads to scrutiny. Senator John Sherman

  4. May 18, 1998 • US DOJ and 20 other states file suit against Microsoft for abusing its monopoly

  5. Case Milestones • November 5, 1999 • Jackson issues preliminary ruling • April 2000 • Jackson orders the breakup of Microsoft, they appeal • June 2001 • Decision overturned • November 2001 • Settlement talks begin • June 30, 2004 • Settlement approved

  6. A Piece of the Pie

  7. IE Usage Statistics

  8. Microsoft Stock History

  9. Microsoft v. Google? • United States v. Google? • Microsoft now worried about monopoly in the industry

  10. Bibliography and References • “Guide to Antitrust Laws.” Washington State Office of the Attorney General. 1999. Web. <http://www.atg.wa.gov/antitrustguide.aspx> • “Microsoft Antitrust Case.” University of Rhode Island. Web. <http://www.uri.edu/personal/mdee4037/MainPage.html> • “Microsoft Antitrust History.” The Seattle Times. 19 December 2003. Web. <http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=20031219&slug=realtime19> • “UNITED STATES V. COLUMBIA STEEL CO.” FindLaw for Legal Professionals. <http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=334&page=495> • Reuters. “S. Carolina Exits Microsoft Suit.” Wired.com. 7 December 1998. Web. <http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/1998/12/16677> • Moore, John Frederick. “MSFT ruled a monopoly.” CNNMoney. 5 November 1999. Web. <http://money.cnn.com/1999/11/05/technology/microsoft_finding> • Editorial. “Did the Microsoft Case Change the World?” The New York Times. 14 May 2011. Web. <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/15/opinion/15sun2.html?_r=1> • Cringely, Robert X. “The Once and Future King: Now the Only Way Microsoft Can Die is by Suicide.” I, Cringely. PBS.org. 8 April 2008. Web. <http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2004/pulpit_20040408_000808.html> • Schofield, Jack. “How much has Microsoft paid out in anti-trust fines?” The Guardian. Newly-Asked Questions. 12 July 2006. Web. <http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2006/jul/13/microsoft.guardianweeklytechnologysection> • Krayewski, Kaila. “Microsoft Accuses Google of Monopoly.” isedb.com. 3 June 2010. Web. <http://isedb.com/20100603-3677.php>

More Related