1 / 9

United States v. Nixon

United States v. Nixon. 1974. Background. Watergate Burglary June 17, 1972 Washington Post Investigation CREEP Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox Senate Watergate Committee Sam Ervin. Background. Tapes Alexander Butterfield Saturday Night Massacre Oct. 20 th , 1973 Leon Jaworski

deon
Download Presentation

United States v. Nixon

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. United States v. Nixon 1974

  2. Background • Watergate Burglary June 17, 1972 • Washington Post Investigation • CREEP • Special Prosecutor • Archibald Cox • Senate Watergate Committee • Sam Ervin

  3. Background • Tapes • Alexander Butterfield • Saturday Night Massacre Oct. 20th, 1973 • Leon Jaworski • Edited Transcripts • Watergate Seven and other Co-conspirators plead guilty • Former Attorney General John Mitchell • White House Counsel John Dean • Nixon’s aides H.R. Haldman and John Elrichman • Nixon’s Personal Lawyer Herbert Kalmbach

  4. Case • James St. Clair represented Nixon • Claimed Executive Privilege • Dispute within Executive branch. Did not require Judicial resolution • no proven need for the tapes in the trial

  5. Decision • Arguments heard on July 8th 1974 • Decision reached on July 24th, 1974 • 8-0 ruling to hand over the tapes • William Rehnquist did not participate due to personal reasons • Chief Justice Warren burger wrote the unanimous opinion

  6. Decision • Nixon must hand over the tapes • The Supreme court has the final voice in determining constitutional questions • While There is an Executive Privilege, the president is not above the law and can not use that privilege to withhold evidence in a criminal trial

  7. Issues and result • Addressed the matter of Executive Privilege • Reaffirmed Marbury v. Madison • 4th amendment • Nixon handed over the tapes on July 30th, 1974 • Nixon resigned 10 days later

  8. My Opinion • Agree • No person is above the law, not even the President

  9. Quotes and facts • Four of the Justices were appointed by Nixon • Chief Justice Warren Burger • Harry Blackmun • Lewis Powell, Jr. • William Rehnquist • "The President wants me to argue that he is as powerful a monarch as Louis XIV, only four years at a time, and is not subject to the processes of any court in the land except the court of impeachment.“ – James St.Clair • "Mr. St. Clair, what public interest is there in preserving secrecy with respect to a criminal conspiracy?" - Justice Lewis Powell • "Neither the doctrine of separation of powers, nor the need for confidentiality of high-level communications, without more, can sustain an absolute, unqualified Presidential privilege of immunity from judicial process under all circumstances. The President's need for complete candor and objectivity from advisors calls for great deference from the courts. However, when the privilege depends solely on the broad, undifferentiated claim of public interest in the confidentiality of such conversations, a confrontation with other values arises."—Chief Justice Warren Burger

More Related