1 / 34

Weather forecasting by computer

Weather forecasting by computer. Michael Revell NIWA m.revell@niwa.co.nz. Introduction. History Operational NWP system Forecast model Data assimilation Verification Interpretation and limitations of output. NWP History. Wilhelm Bjerknes (1904)

hdan
Download Presentation

Weather forecasting by computer

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Weather forecasting by computer Michael Revell NIWA m.revell@niwa.co.nz

  2. Introduction • History • Operational NWP system • Forecast model • Data assimilation • Verification • Interpretation and limitations of output

  3. NWP History • Wilhelm Bjerknes (1904) • Suggested integrating differential equations that describe atmosphere • Lewis Fry Richardson (1922) • First attempt (WW1) • Dismal failure, but wrote method down • Estimated 64,000 people needed to do calculation • Courant, Friedrichs, Lewy (1928) • Time and space steps can’t be chosen independently • Radiosonde invented (1930) • Upper air data

  4. NWP History (cont) • Rossby (1930+) • Simplified version of vorticity equation • Von Neuman + ENIAC (1945) • Electronic Numerical Integrator and Computer • First electronic computer • Charney (1950) • First successful numerical forecast based on vorticity equation • Satellite technology (1970+) • Much improved data coverage over sea (SH) • Faster computers + global models + improved use of initial data ECMWF (1980+)

  5. Numerical Weather Prediction Aim: To predict future state of atmospheric circulation from knowledge of present state by using numerical approximations to the dynamical equations

  6. Operational NWP system Requirements: • Closed set of appropriate physical laws • Expressed in mathematical form • Accurate numerical method to integrate these equations forward in time • Suitable initial and boundary conditions • (on the globe no lateral boundaries)

  7. Closed set of appropriate physical laws • Conservation of momentum (u,v,w) • Conservation of energy (T) • Conservation of mass (p) • Conservation of water substance (r) • 6 equations – 6 unknowns

  8. Expressed in mathematical form • Example: • With c a specified speed • q(x,0) a known initial condition

  9. Accurate numerical method to integrate these equations forward in time • Approximate with centred differences • Giving

  10. Initial and boundary values

  11. An NWP cycle • Get first guess at current situation • Usually 3 or 6 hr forecast • Make new observations • (Generally not at model grid points) • Interpolate these to model grid points • Filter out information the model can’t resolve • Step the model forward (3 or 6 hrs) • Use this forecast to repeat from step 1.

  12. Time (hours) 0 3 6 9 12 A 48 h forecast bkg bkg 3 h forecast A A obs obs obs 3 h forecast… bkg 48 h forecast A NZLAM-VAR: Forecast-Analysis Cycle

  13. Simple! So why are forecasts not perfect? Over recent years there have been dramatic improvements, but there remains • Model error • Models now solve the conservation laws quite accurately down to the scale of the grid • Still have to represent the effect of scales that the model doesn’t resolve (parameterize) • Cumulus clouds • Mixing / diffusion • Surface friction • Surface energy balance • Radiation (dependent on moisture) • chemistry These are predominantly the sources and sinks for our conservation laws

  14. Model error • Specifying the initial and boundary conditions is still a problem – lack of good data • This is being improved by remotely sensed satellite data • Better methods to utilise it • This has improved SH forecasts by ~ 2-3 days

  15. Brisbane Invercargill Conventional Data • TEMP: 12 & 24 h • PILOT: 12 & 24 h • Ships : 3 h • Buoys: ~6 h • SYNOPS: 3 h • AMDAR & AIREP

  16. Satellite Data • TOVS / ATOVS: • NOAA14 • HIRS 2, 3, 4, 5 • MSU 2, 3, 4 • NOAA15 • AMSU 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 • SSM/I • 1D-VAR retrievals of surface wind speed • SATWINDS • GMS atmospheric motion vectors

  17. Forecasts • What does the output from a weather prediction model look like?

  18. ECMWF MSLP + RH predictions

  19. 5D Visualisation – Vis5D

  20. 12 km NZLAM: Model Domains Uses UK Met Office Unified Model and 3DVAR Data Assimilation: • 12 km resolution domain • 324 × 324 × 38 • 4 km resolution domain • 600 × 600 × 38

  21. 4 km NZLAM: Model Domains Uses UK Met Office Unified Model and 3DVAR Data Assimilation: • 12 km resolution domain • 324 × 324 × 38 • 4 km resolution domain • 600 × 600 × 38 • 2 km resolution domain • 800 × 800 × 38 (Largest UM run to date – 360 Processors on Cray T3E)

  22. NZLAM 10m Wind Forecast:22-Jun-05:06 UTC • NZLAM 10m Winds: • 24 h forecast Verifying QuikSCAT 10 m winds

  23. Microphysics: Cloud Predictions NZLAM-VAR 12 hour forecast: low, low + mid, low + mid + high “Verifying” GMS 11m image for 16 Dec 1999, 1640 UTC

  24. Microphysics: Rain rates

  25. Example NZLAM Simulations

  26. Verification • How good are our models at predicting weather variables?

  27. Temperature

  28. Wind

  29. Surface forecasts

  30. Observations “Truth” Low res. model High res. model Issues & Challenges • Right feature, wrong place?

  31. Future • Improve data coverage • Increase grid resolution • Improve model representation of sub grid processes • How do we cope with imperfect models? • There is useful information there • How do we get at it? • Ensemble methods (probabilities) • Model output statistics (correct statistically for model biases)

  32. Ensemble methods

  33. Ensemble methods (cont)

  34. Questions?

More Related