1 / 13

Sleeping Bag Comparison

Compare two sleeping bags with similar specifications but different prices to determine which one is more effective at retaining heat. Findings show a 12% better heat retention for Sleeping Bag 2, but the price difference doesn't justify it.

hcarrier
Download Presentation

Sleeping Bag Comparison

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sleeping Bag Comparison Which sleeping bag will keep you warmer? By: Kyle Layton and Ben Salazar

  2. Introduction • Camping is fun, but can be cold, especially in the winter. • Many companies make claims that their brand of sleeping bag is better at keeping you warm in cold conditions Research Objective: • We want to compare two sleeping bags that have very similar materials and specifications but drastically different prices and experimentally find out which is more effective at retaining heat • We will do this by deriving a heat transfer rate for the different forms of heat loss • We will then plug in values for each sleeping bag that we measure in our experiment and obtain the heat transfer associated with each sleeping bag • We will compare these values and determine which brand of sleeping bag is better at keeping a camper warm

  3. Introduction – sleeping bags • Sleeping bag 1 – Ledge Mummy Sleeping bag • Operating temperatures: + 20º F • Price: $60.00 • Sleeping bag 1 - Northface Mummy Sleeping bag • Operating temperatures: + 20º F • Price: $200.00 Which is better?

  4. Methods Assumptions: • Zip Loc bags have uniform surface temperature • Zip Loc bags can be approximated as as spheres with properties of water • Sleeping bags can be approximated as flat surfaces • Floor can be treated as a semi-infinite solid • Thickness of material of sleeping bag can be neglected due to compression • 1-D heat transfer Materials used: • 2 Small Zip-Loc bags large enough to fit 500 ml of liquid • Beaker • Water • Microwave • Two sleeping bags of the same size and style, but different brands • Infrared thermal laser digital thermometer • FLIR E5 compact thermal imaging infrared camera

  5. Methods • Filled Zip-Loc bags with a fixed volume of warm water • Measured water volume using a beaker: 475 ml = 475 x 10-6 m3 • Heated water to 49º C using a microwave • Measured the temperature of water, the room, and the sleeping bag using an infrared thermal laser digital thermometer • Placed Zip-Loc bags in sleeping bags and monitored temperature of both the sleeping bag and the Zip-Loc bag over a 45 min time interval. • Took thermal images using FLIR E5 Compact Thermal Imaging InfraRedCamera for visualization purposes

  6. Methods • The bag of water at 49º C is assumed to heat at least a small portion of the sleeping bag. • If we approximate the patch of sleeping bag that was heated as a small plate we can use the following equations: • Using these values, the Rayleigh number was calculated for each corresponding measurement: Ra = Pr(Gr) • This gave us a way to calculate the average h value for surfaces • Then, using the equation Qair = hA(ΔT*t), we calculated the heat transfer between each measurement through free convection. • The total heat loss through the air was found by summing values for these Qair values( see appendix)

  7. Methods • Heat transfer through the ground was calculated assuming a semi-infinite solid in contact with a uniform temperature surface, using: • For each measurement, similar to the procedure outlined for Qair, q” values for each time interval were calculated and then summed • Heat loss through the air (Qair ) and through the ground (q”) were then summed to determine the total heat loss

  8. Results – Thermal images Sleeping bag 1 – Ledge Mummy sleeping bag Qtotal = 8970 W/m2

  9. Results – Thermal Images Sleeping bag 2 – Northface Mummy sleeping bag Qtotal = 7890 W/m2

  10. Conclusion • A slight difference was detected between the two sleeping bag brands • At Qtotal = 7890 Sleeping bag 2 more effectively retained heat and thus would keep a camper warmer • This represents a 12% better heat retention • Despite its better performance, we do not believe this justifies the $140 price difference between the two products • We therefore recommend the use and purchase of the less expensive and still effective sleeping bag

  11. Appendix – Experimental Measurements

  12. Appendix – Preliminary Calculations

  13. Appendix – Final Calculations & Results

More Related