1 / 16

June 1980

THE OPM CASE: What Really Happened Clark D. Cunningham W. Lee Burge Professor of Law & Ethics Georgia State University College of Law [Primarily drawn from Taylor, “Ethics and the Law: A Case History,” New York Times Magazine (Jan 9, 1983)]. June 1980.

hashim-torres
Download Presentation

June 1980

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. THE OPM CASE:What Really HappenedClark D. CunninghamW. Lee Burge Professor of Law & EthicsGeorgia State UniversityCollege of Law[Primarily drawn from Taylor, “Ethics and the Law: A Case History,”New York Times Magazine (Jan 9, 1983)] Professional Development Consortium

  2. June 1980 • Hutner meets with Clifton's attorney, William Davis • According to Davis Clifton has evidence that • O.P.M. had perpetrated a multimillion-dollar fraud • the opinion letters Singer Hutner had drawn up to obtain loans for O.P.M. had been based upon false documents • In Clifton’s opinion, to survive OPM would probably have to continue the same type of wrongful activity Professional Development Consortium

  3. Singer Hutner obtains outside legal advice from Joseph McLaughlin (Dean, Fordham Law School) and Henry Putzel, a former federal prosecutor • The firm wanted to do the ethical thing, and • The fim wanted to continue representing O.P.M. unless they were ethically and legally obliged to quit. • McLaughlin and Putzel “give the law firm the advice they wanted to hear” Professional Development Consortium

  4. Advice from McLaughlin and Putzel • Singer Hutner can ethically continue to represent O.P.M., based on Goodman's assurances that there was no ongoing fraud. • Singer Hutner is bound to keep everything it had already learned secret, except from Weissman. • It is not necessary to check the authenticity of the computer-lease documents with third parties • Singer Hutner has no legal duty to withdraw past opinion letters • leaving the victims of a past fraud in the dark was not an ongoing fraud. Professional Development Consortium

  5. The firm's obligations to O.P.M. might be inconsistent with giving Goodman's secrets the fullest protection. • Thus, a lawyer is found to represent Goodman • Goodman's new lawyer, Lawler ... tells Putzel that he knows of no ongoing fraud. • Hutner had told Goodman his disclosures to Lawler would be protected only so long as they did not indicate any ongoing fraud. Professional Development Consortium

  6. Summer 1980 Singer Hutner continues closing loans for O.P.M. without checking the legitimacy of underlying Rockwell leases. Professional Development Consortium

  7. September 1980 • 1st week of September, Goodman tells Hutner some of the details of the fraud • September 23 the firm votes formally to resign as O.P.M.'s general counsel • The firm quits O.P.M. gradually • assume that an abrupt withdrawal would cause O.P.M. to collapse • will handle legal business until OPM can find new counsel. Professional Development Consortium

  8. Duty of Confidentiality to OPM The firm • tells nothing to the corporations and bankers who had been defrauded • responds to inquiries from lenders and other interested parties by saying Singer Hutner and O.P.M. had agreed to part ways. • honors Goodman's demand that Gary Simon, the O.P.M. in-house lawyer who was preparing to handle new loan closings, be kept in the dark. Professional Development Consortium

  9. October 1980 • Peter Fishbein, a Kaye Scholer partner and an old friend, phones Hutner asking • "is there anything I should be aware of" in considering Goodman's invitation to represent OPM • Hutner tells him only that • "the decision to terminate was mutual and that there was mutual agreement that the circumstances of termination would not be discussed." Professional Development Consortium

  10. December 1980 • Singer Hutner completes withdrawal • Rockwell International • Receives bank inquiry and upon investigation • Discovers it was paying OPM on two leases for which it lacked documentation • After further investigation, Rockwell and the bank contact the U.S. Attorney's Office Professional Development Consortium

  11. February 1981 • A federal grand jury issues a number of indictments • Although federal prosecutors investigated Reinhard, neither he nor any of the other Singer Hutner lawyers are indicted. Professional Development Consortium

  12. March 1981 OPM files bankruptcy Professional Development Consortium

  13. December 1982 • Goodman pleads guilty to 16 counts of conspiracy, mail fraud, wire fraud and making false statements to a bank • given a 12 year prison sentence. • Weissman also pleads guilty and receives a 10 year sentence. Professional Development Consortium

  14. The Truth about OPM • O.P.M. was short for "other people's money." • Almost from the start, the company was basically insolvent and survived by means of fraud and bribery. • A single computer would be used as collateral for two or three loans with different banks • the value of a given piece of equipment would be inflated to obtain larger loans. Professional Development Consortium

  15. The Financial Consequences • OPM had defrauded banks and other lenders of more than $210 million before the company went bankrupt in 1981 • June - August 1980: $61 million in fraudulent loans were closed with Singer Hutner as OPM’s lawyers • December 80 - Jan 81: $15 million in fraudulent loans were closed with in-house counsel and Kaye Scholer as OPM’s lawyers Professional Development Consortium

  16. 1983 • Settlement of lawsuit filed by 19 lending institutions against Singer Hutner, Rockwell, Lehman Brothers and two accounting firms. • Total payment of $65 million • Singer Hutner contributed approximately $10 million. Professional Development Consortium

More Related