1 / 15

DSpace Progress and Challenges Navigating the Standard Seas

DSpace Progress and Challenges Navigating the Standard Seas. Robert Tansley Google Inc. 21 September 2006. Overview. State of the DSpace Nation New Developments Standards The China Digital Museum Project Future needs. State of the DSpace Nation. Well over 150 institutional users

haru
Download Presentation

DSpace Progress and Challenges Navigating the Standard Seas

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DSpace Progress and ChallengesNavigating the Standard Seas • Robert TansleyGoogle Inc.21 September 2006

  2. Overview • State of the DSpace Nation • New Developments • Standards • The China Digital Museum Project • Future needs

  3. State of the DSpace Nation • Well over 150 institutional users • 9 committers, very active developer and technical lists • New features, bug reports, fixes pour in • Large technical community with deep understanding of system • Architecture largely unchanged for 4 years • “Chaotic” OSS community great for incremental feature/UI development; architectural developments more difficult • Committer group (and everyone else) have day jobs • Perception that some centralised team somewhere is taking care of it (committers? MIT? HP?)

  4. New Developments • DSpace governance advisory board formed, first met March 2006 • Decision made to form a 501(c)(3) non-profit • DSpace architecture review group formed, charged with advancing the platform’s architecture (“community-ratified” decision making)

  5. DSpace Architecture Review • Technical scope of the project: Application or middleware? • Data model, versioning • Modularisation, network vs local APIs • “Scalability” • Managing complexity • Interoperability • Key aspect is trying to make DSpace less "monolithic” • while retaining "out of the box" usage

  6. Which standards does DSpace use? • Dublin Core • OAI-PMH • Handle System • METS • PREMIS

  7. CSS DC DTD HTTP HTTPS Handle System Harmony/ABC LDAP METS MIME MODS MPEG-21 DIDL OAI-PMH PDF PREMIS RDF RDFS SMTP SQL SRW SSL TLS URI + URL UTF-8 WebDAV X.509 XHTML XML XML Schema XSLT Which standards does DSpace use?

  8. So why aren’t all those enough? • Need a blend of standards • Standards don’t answer the hard questions • “Implementation issue” • Many, radically different data models • Standards can become an obstacle rather than a help

  9. The China Digital Museum Project • Many universities in China have a museum • Many objects of historic, cultural, educational and research value • Due to space requirements, and size (geographic and population) of the country, museum contents are not optimally utilised • Additionally, some physical objects are deteriorating • Therefore objects are being digitised • Improve access • Preserve • HP, China Ministry of Education, Beihang university project • Results will be added to OSS DSpace

  10. Architecture

  11. Possibilities

  12. Data Model Challenges • Modelling object types/classes • Relationships (containership, other) • Representation information • File formats • Complex objects • “Semantics” (e.g. how to interpret columns in dataset) • Derived, converted, “equivalent” or lossy inter-representation relationships • Serialisations of all the above

  13. China DM Project Data Model

  14. How to address • More aggressive standards • Data models • Representation information (beyond file formats) • Make tradeoffs • Don’t just “leave as implementation detail”; massively reduces standard’s utility, potential for impact

  15. Summary • Standards are too “visible” • We need to make standards “disappear” • And be willing to accept tradeoffs • Flexibility isn’t always a good thing!!

More Related