1 / 17

No Use Empty Initiative Kent County Council Andrew Lavender Capital Project Consultancy

No Use Empty Initiative Kent County Council Andrew Lavender Capital Project Consultancy. What we set out to achieve.

hanzila
Download Presentation

No Use Empty Initiative Kent County Council Andrew Lavender Capital Project Consultancy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. No Use Empty Initiative Kent County CouncilAndrew Lavender Capital Project Consultancy

  2. What we set out to achieve • To improve the physical environment in four coastal districts of Kent - Dover, Shepway, Swale and Thanet by bringing empty properties back into use. These districts contain 19 out of the 20 most deprived wards in Kent and over 3,000 long term empty properties. Agreed Performance Indicators (PSA Target – 3 Years) • Return 372 private sector long term empty or poorly used properties, including HMO’s, into occupation as quality accommodation (100% increase on performance) • Improve by 15% both residents’ perceptions of the physical environment and business confidence • Scheme extended in 2009 to all Kent (12 Authorities)

  3. Our Approach • KCC appointed a project manager for the initiative • Undertook initial collection of evidence, including residents & business survey, survey of empty properties, mapping exercise (Empty Homes Agency) • Appointed “Tamesis” - a PR & media relations company to raise and promote the profile of the initiative • Appointed “Capital Project Consultancy Ltd (CPC)” – to provide professional and technical expertise • Provide financial & non financial support to the Districts

  4. CPC Role (Providing Guidance & Technical Support ) • Provide professional and technical expertise, particularly in relation to enforcement action and training • A floating resource to the district councils (virtual team) • Hands on approach to deal with the most difficult properties Initiative three strands: £5 millon capital fund to support: (Revolving Fund) • Loan Scheme • Partnership Fund • KCC Direct Purchase

  5. Loan Scheme • Kent County Council – not a Housing Authority • Loans - £25,000 per unit, maximum of £175,000 per applicant. • Properties must be sold or let on completion (decent homes standard) • Do not offer loans where property willbe occupied by applicant (FSA) • Secured as a financial charge against property • Maximum LTV 90%, independent valuation (charged to applicant) • 100% of the funding provided upfront • Must comply with money laundering regulations

  6. Loan Scheme - Outcomes • Loans Approved to date £1.6 million £400k (Sell) £1.2 million (Let) • Private Sector Leverage £3.4 million • Number of units produced 99 • KCC average investment per unit £16,500 • Actual cost to KCC (interest only @5%) £2,569 per unit • Loans paid back to date £400K • Viable applications in system £1.8 million

  7. Partnership Scheme • Provide funding to facilitate: • Compulsory Purchase Orders • Works in Default (Building Act, HousingAct, Town and Country Planning Act) • Empty Dwelling Management Orders • Direct Purchase (CPO or otherwise) • Supported by Consultant : • Identifying the most appropriate course of action for individual properties • Providing technical guidance on implementing their chosen course of action • Working with EPO to encourage other departments to become more actively involved

  8. Direct Purchase • Looking to acquire key properties to demonstrate benefits of returning empty properties back into use • Link with the wider regeneration activities • Look for opportunities to link with RSL’s • Link with construction training initiatives.

  9. Informal Advice & Website www.no-use-empty.org Awareness • Quarterly newsletters, leaflets, mail outs • Developed databases for the authority • Estate agents / management agents, builders & developers Advice & guidance always first course of action • Open day empty property owners, each area • Vat implications empty 10 years 0%, >2 years 5% • Capital Allowance Scheme (flats above shops etc) • Home improvement agency, list of builders etc • Advertise their property for sale for free • Advice on method of disposal or options if renting • Guidance on planning – maximise profit etc • FOI request, will act as a referral service for an interested party. Website • One stop resource for empty property owners and practitioners • Hotline and web reporting of empties

  10. Training / Mentoring • Empty property officers are froma wide range of backgrounds and thelevel of knowledge and experience varies considerably Training courses (CPC & others): Low Cost • When negotiations fail (EHA, ODPM, Manchester, Newham) • Compulsory Purchase Orders • Enforced Sales Procedure • Empty Dwelling Management Orders • Rd SAP, Decent Homes, Residential Property Tribunals • HHSRS, Enforcement HA 2004, Part L Building Regulations • Tracing People, Asbestos, Electrical / Gas • Individual LA Training (in house) • In total, over 560 Officers have attended the courses • On the job training as cases progress

  11. When Negotiations Fail – Enforcement Options Councils have a range of powers at their disposal to secure the improvement of properties To deal effectively with the problem takes a corporate approach and using the most appropriate legislation to deal with the problem Cannot secure the occupation of the property, but can make the owner take responsibility for their property Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (Section 215 adverse affecting amenity) Building Act 1984 (Section 77-79, dangerous structures & ruinous and dilapidated) Housing Act 1985 & 2004 (improvement notices, EDMO’s (24), demolition, CPO) Environmental Protection Act 1990 (Section 79/80 statutory nuisance) Prevention of Damage by Pests Act 1949 (Section 4 harbourage & treatment of pests) Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1982 (section 29 boarding up) Enforced sales procedure & compulsory purchase orders Recovered £148,000 Works in Default & £37,000 Council Tax Debt 24 EDMOs Case (£65,000 Council Tax & £42,000 Section 106 Agreement Monies)

  12. Section 215: Town & Country Planning Act 1990

  13. Section 215: Town & Country Planning Act 1990

  14. 77 Eastern Esplanade, Margate – Case Study

  15. 77 Eastern Esplanade, Margate – Case Study

  16. Achievements to date Strong partnership arrangements between KCC and the District Councils Increased output, knowledge, expertise of professional staff and development and sharing of good practice. 487 Properties brought back into use during scheme, target 372. 2010 target – 650/850achieved 803 to April 2009 (All Kent LA’s) Initiative has been extended to all Authorities in Kent

  17. Questions?Andrew.Lavender@kent.gov.uk Contact No. 07867987550

More Related