1 / 49

Human dopaminergic system

hanh
Download Presentation

Human dopaminergic system

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. FIGURE 4 Responses of dopamine neurons to unpredicted primary reward (top) and the transfer of this response to progressively earlier reward-predicting conditioned stimuli with training (middle). The bottom record shows a control baseline task when the reward is predicted by an earlier stimulus and not the light. From Schultz et al. (1995) with permission.

  2. Odor Selective Cells in the Amygdala fire preferentially with regard to outcome or reward value of an odor prior to demonstration that the animal has learned this outcome or value. Odor Selective Cells in the Amygdala fire preferentially with regard to outcome or reward value of an odor simultaneous to demonstration that the animal has learned this outcome or value.

  3. Cells in Orbitofrontal Cortex (OFC) show less selectivity to outcome, in rats without an amygdala. This demonstrates a role for the amygdala in conveying motivational/reward information to the OFC.

  4. Dopamine, reward processing and optimal predictionONLY AS A REFERENCE FOR THOSE WHO ARE INTERESTED IN BEGINNING TO CROSS THE NEUROBEHAVIORALCOMPUTATIONAL DIVIDE – Maybe after the Exam??

  5. Human dopaminergic system

  6. Cortical and striatal projections Schultz, 1998

  7. Koob & Le Moal, 2001

  8. Schultz, Dayan & Montague 1997

  9. Expected Reward v = wu v : expected reward w : weight (association) u : stimulus (binary)

  10. Rescorla-Wagner Rule Association update rule: w  w + αδu w : weight (association) α : learning rate u : stimulus Prediction error: δ = r - v r : actual reward v : expected reward

  11. Rescorla - Wagner provides account for: Some Pavlovian conditioning Extinction Partial reinforcement and, with more than one stimulus: Blocking Inhibitory conditioning Overshadowing … but not Latent inhibition (CS preexposure effect) Secondary conditioning

  12. A recent update: uncertainty (i²) Kakade, Montague & Dayan, 2001

  13. Kalman weight update rule: wiwi + αi δ With associability: αi=i² ui jj² uj+E

  14. An example:

  15. U1 U2 U3 U4 U5 input U(t)

  16. input U(t) r(t)

  17. input U(t) w(t) r(t)

  18. input U(t) ŵ(t) v(t)

  19. input U(t) ŵ(t) r(t) v(t)

  20. input U(t) ŵ(t) δ(t) r(t) v(t)

  21. Error Rule (t) = r(t) - v(t)

  22. U(t) ŵ(t) inset Ui -input i -uncertainty v(t) wi -weight

  23. Uncertainty

  24. Kalman learning & associability weight update rule: ŵi (t+1) = ŵi (t) + αi (t) δ(t) associability: αi(t)=i(t)² xi(t) jj(t)² xj(t)+E

  25. Stimulus uncertainties

  26. Reward prediction

  27. Predicting future reward single time steps: v = wuv : expected reward w : weight (association) u : stimulus total predicted reward: v(t) = w(τ) u(t - τ) t : time steps in a trial τ : current time step t  τ=0

  28. Sum of discounted future rewards: With 0 ≤ γ≤ 1 In recursive form: Schultz, Dayan & Montague, 1997

  29. Exponential discounting, γ = .95

  30. Temporal difference rule Total estimated future reward:v(t) = r(t)+ γv(t+1) r(t) = v(t)-γv(t+1) Temporal difference rule: δ = r(t)+γv(t+1)-v(t) (With single time steps: δ = r - v r : actual reward v : expected reward )

  31. Temporal difference rule Total estimated future reward:v(t) = r(t)+v(t+1) r(t) = v(t)-v(t+1) Temporal difference rule: δ = r(t) + v(t+1)-v(t) (With single time steps: δ = r - v r : actual reward v : expected reward )

  32. Schultz, Dayan & Montague, 1997

  33. Schultz, 1996

  34. Anatomical interpretation Schultz, Dayan & Montague, 1997

  35. Temporal Difference Rule for Navigation between successive steps u and u’ δ = ra (u) + γ v(u’)-v(u)

  36. Behavior evaluation Hippocampal place field Foster, Morris & Dayan 2000

  37. Spatial learning Foster, Morris & Dayan 2000

  38. Conclusions • Behavioral study of (nonhuman) neural systems is interesting • Neural processes amenable to contemporary learning theory • .. they may play distinct roles a normative framework of learning e.g. vta, hippocampus, subiculum, also- Ach in NBM/SI,NE inLC,5-HT,ventral striatum, lateral connections , core/shell distinctions of the NAAC, patch-matrix anatomy in basal ganglia, the superior colliculus, psychoalphabetadiscobioaquadodoo

More Related