1 / 20

Center for Drugs: CT Medical Countermeasures

Center for Drugs: CT Medical Countermeasures. Dianne Murphy, M.D. Director Office of Counterterrorism & Pediatric Drug Development (OCTAP) Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). CDER/ DCT : Mission Statement for Counter-Terrorism Goals.

hachi
Download Presentation

Center for Drugs: CT Medical Countermeasures

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Center for Drugs: CT Medical Countermeasures Dianne Murphy, M.D. Director Office of Counterterrorism & Pediatric Drug Development (OCTAP) Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) FDA Science Board

  2. CDER/DCT:Mission Statement for Counter-Terrorism Goals • Identify gaps in current medical counter-measures (MCM) • Identify gaps in knowledge base necessary for approval of specific MCM • Construct an action plan Assure availability of S&E drugs to treat victims of terrorist attack

  3. Biodefense Approvals • 1973: Atropen • 1983: Pralidoxime (2-PAM) autoinjectors • 1990: Diazepam autoinjector • 1992: Sodium Thiosulfate Injection • 2000: SERPACWA • 2002: ATNAA • February, 2003: Pyridostigmine Bromide • 1st APPROVAL UNDER “ANIMAL EFFICACY RULE”

  4. Bio/Homeland Defense Approvals* • 1979: Potassium Iodide (KI) • 2000: Cipro for Anthrax (PEP) • 2001: Doxycycline and Procaine Penicillin G for Anthrax PEP (FR notice)* • 2002: Thyrosafe, KI 65 mg • February 2003: Prussian Blue (FR notice)* • June 2003: Pediatric Atropine Injection • September 2003: Ca- and Zn- DTPAs (finding of safety and efficacy) • October 2003: Prussian Blue Radiogardase *Not true “approval” but Federal Register notice of Agency finding of Safety and Efficacy

  5. Opportunities to Accelerate Approval:1. Regulatory Mechanism2. Funding Mechanisms

  6. Expedite CT Drug Development • FDA-sponsor collaboration early in drug development (Pre-IND) • Study design, including endpoints (esp. animal models) • “Fast Track” designation during clinical development • “Accelerated Approval”(Subpart H) • Use of clinical efficacy surrogate • “Animal Rule”(Subpart I)

  7. CT Products Subpart H(Clinical Efficacy Surrogate) • Ciprofloxacin: • Surrogate Markers: Cmax/MIC>10 is desirable range • Non-Human Primate Animal Model Critical Element • Human Pathophysiology from Sverdlovsk • Safety Data Enormous • Limited but adequate pediatric data

  8. Cipro:Surrogate MarkerAnthrax Monkey Data- Cipro

  9. Challenge (from Friedlander et al 1993) Survival TOC End of treatment

  10. Federal Register Notice: Finding of Safety & Efficacy November 2, 2001: Federal RegisterNotice: Doxycycline and Penicillin G Procaine Administration for Inhalational Anthrax (Post-Exposure)

  11. “Federal Register Notice: publication of finding of safety and efficacy” • “FDA reviews the available data on a drug product and makes a determination • FDA’s findings are published in the FR • The FR Notice may reference a Guidance on how to submit a New Drug Application • FR notice may also reference draft labeling • Examples: • Prussian Blue– call for NDA’s in Federal Register Notice – January 2003 • Ca- and Zn- DTPAs

  12. Animal Rule(Subpart I*) • “Evidence Needed to Demonstrate Effectiveness of New Drugs When Human Efficacy Studies Are Not Ethical or Feasible” • Federal Register (final rule): 5/31/02 • 21 CFR 314.600-650 & 601.90-95* *Subpart H in CBER regulations

  13. Animal Rule Requirements • Understanding of the drug’s mechanism • Efficacy extrapolation from animal models to predict human response • Understand interspecies differences where they exist • “Two Animal Rule” - NOT ! • Animal and human pharmacokinetic data are used to select an effective dose in humans • Safety assessment must involve humans

  14. Pyridostigmine bromide Safety Database • Approved as Mestinon (“high dose”) • for myasthenia gravis • Pre-exposure antidote against soman (nerve agent). Given to troops during 1991 Gulf War Efficacy • Based on effects documented in Rhesus and Guinea Pig • Fundamental understanding of mechanism • Ability to understand and explain differences among species

  15. Funding Mechanisms • Grants (RFA) • Contracts (RFP) • Inter-Agency Agreements (IAG’s) • Project BioShield (legislation pending)

  16. Counter-Terrorism Studies in Special Populations • In fiscal year 2002, we funded several studies via the Office of Women's Health (OWH). These studies included: • a. Amoxicillin PK: Pregnancy and Postpartum – (contract: University of Washington, Seattle, Center of Excellence • b. Cipro and Doxy: lactating women and elderly (contract: Indiana School of Medicine, Center of Excellence) • c. PK/PD: Gent, Azithro, & Cipro: Pregnancy of (contract with University of Wisconsin, Madison) • d. Fetal Safety: Cipro, Doxy, Amoxicillin, Azithro - Exposure to CT Countermeasures (contract with Vanderbilt University, Nashville)

  17. Leveraging Resources • NIAID/USAMRIID – Plague NHP Studies • CDC – Human clinical trials in areas with endemic plague • Databases from HMO’s and others: long-term antibiotic data use • NIAID and academic institutions: smaller bridging animal models

  18. Food-born Pathogens and Countermeasures FDA Science Board

  19. Bacteria

  20. Protozoa

More Related