1 / 53

Monitoring of Groundwater and Surfacewater Interactions on the Walla Walla River

Monitoring of Groundwater and Surfacewater Interactions on the Walla Walla River. Graduate Student: Starr Silvis Major Professor: John Selker Field Coordinator: Bob Bower. Presentation Outline. Location and features of the basin Background Goals Methods Chemical Signature

gyala
Download Presentation

Monitoring of Groundwater and Surfacewater Interactions on the Walla Walla River

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Monitoring of Groundwater and Surfacewater Interactions on the Walla Walla River Graduate Student: Starr Silvis Major Professor: John Selker Field Coordinator: Bob Bower

  2. Presentation Outline • Location and features of the basin • Background • Goals • Methods • Chemical Signature • Mini-piezometers • Temperature Profiling • Results • Discussion

  3. Location of the Walla Walla River Basin

  4. Water Resources for the Basin • Surface water • North Fork and South Fork • Groundwater • Alluvial aquifer • Basalt aquifers

  5. Monthly Mean Flows 22 years of data 1969 - 1991

  6. Walla Walla River Returns! • All river water above levied section (~100 c.f.s.) diverted for irrigation since turn of the century from June – September • 1998 American Rivers lists Walla Walla River as one of the top 20 most endangered rivers in the U.S. • Bull trout and Steelhead E.S.A. listed in 1998 and 1999 • Irrigation districts pledge to leave flow in the mainstem of the Walla Walla River; sign agreement with U.S.F.W. • 2000 – 13 c.f.s • 2001 – 18 c.f.s. • 2002 – 25 c.f.s • 2003 - ?

  7. Summer 1999 Summer 2002

  8. Low Flow Limitations • 2000 - all 13 c.f.s. percolated from the surface • Possible causes • In-stream gravel mining • Naturally high hydraulic conductivity (Schälchli, 1995,1992) • Large hydraulic gradients due to low aquifer levels

  9. Aquifer Recharge • Irrigation ditch losses • Primarily unlined ditches • Stream losses • Winter recharge • Now – summer recharge too

  10. Study Goals • Provide quantitative framework for the surface and groundwater exchanges • Determine influent / effluent nature of levied section • Quantify river losses • Identify seasonal patterns • Estimate alluvial aquifer recharge

  11. SW/GW Overview Water flows from the stream into the subsurface Water flows from the subsurface into the stream

  12. Methods • Chemical Signature • Mini-piezometers • Temperature profiling • Ditch loss

  13. Chemical Signature Requirements • Conservative and naturally occurring • Chloride and Sulphate • GW/SW must have distinctly different concentrations • Ease of analysis • Ion chromatography

  14. Chemical Signature • Grab Sampling • Mainstem Walla Walla River • Shallow aquifer wells • 10% duplicate sampling • Data Analysis • Mixing space diagrams • Linear Regressions • Mass Balance

  15. Qgw Cgw Qsin Qs Cs Csin Upstream sampling point Downstream sampling point Accumulation = In – Out Accumulation = 0 In = Out Chemical Signature; Mass Balance

  16. Groundwater Sampling Sites Red dots are wells Hwy 11 Tumalum Bridge Walla Walla River Nursery Bridge Milton-Freewater

  17. In-Stream Sampling Sites Tumalum Bridge Nursery Bridge Milton-Freewater

  18. Mini-Piezometers Vertical Hydraulic Gradient = dh/dl Stream surface dh Streambed surface dl Mid-point of perforations

  19. Temperature profiling device Mini-piezometer

  20. Temperature Profiling

  21. Temperature Profiling Analytical Methods • HYDRUS-2D (Šimůnek et al., 1999) • Computer model using inverse processes to solve for vertical flux • Sine Wave Fitting • Stallman’s (1965) equation for a sine wave fit to the data

  22. Temperature Profiling • HYDRUS-2D • Sophocleus (1979) Conduction Convection

  23. Temperature Profiling • Sine Wave Fitting • Stallman (1965) • Solution for diurnally heated and cooled boundary condition Tz (t) = ΔT e-az sin (2πt/τ – bz) + Taz

  24. Temperature Profiling; No Flux HYDRUS-2D no flux simulation R2 = 0.95

  25. Ditch Loss Study Installed dam Covered with plastic Allowed to fill to capacity Shut off water supply Measured time and depth of draining for 6 hours

  26. Chemical Signature; GW R2 = 0.89

  27. Chemical Signature; SW R2 = 0.96

  28. Chemical Signature; Mass Balance Filled symbols correspond to left axis, open symbols correspond to the right axis GW dominates Tumalum Bridge SW dominates Qgw Qsin

  29. Mini-piezometers Nursery Bridge Tumalum Bridge duplicates duplicates

  30. Temperature Profile

  31. Temperature Profiling; Sine Wave M 5.5 August 14

  32. Temperature Profiling; HYDRUS-2D

  33. Temperature Profiling; Sine Wave vs. HYDRUS-2D Pink are results using loggers 3 to 2 (15 cm) Blue are results using loggers 3 to 1 (30 cm)

  34. Mini-piezometers

  35. Seasonal Patterns; Mini-Piezometers K = -Q / (A dh/dl)

  36. Seasonal Patterns; Temperature

  37. Ditch Loss • Infiltration estimate 204 cm/d

  38. Conclusions • Effluent river on section studied • Estimated flow loss • 0.3-0.76 m3/s using temperature estimates • 0.43-0.63 m3/s using in-stream flow measurements • Seasonally hydraulic conductivity decreased • factor of 2-4 using temperature profiling estimates • factor of 2-100 using mini-piezometer estimates

  39. Implications for GW recharge of the shallow aquifer • Assuming only 50 km of ditches with an average infiltration rate of 204 cm/d • 2 * 107 m3 / yr • On an area of 538 km2 and a porosity of 0.27equivalent to 23 cm of water • Assuming 5 months at max infiltration rate of 310 cm/day using temperature profiling estimates • 1.8 * 108 m3 / yr • On an area of 538 km2 equivalent to 1.2 meters of water

More Related