1 / 9

Incentivizing Communities and Providers to Improve Health and Education Outcomes: PNPM Generasi

Incentivizing Communities and Providers to Improve Health and Education Outcomes: PNPM Generasi. August 19 th , 2011. Structure of Presentation. Two forms of “incentives” in the existing program model Performance-based incentives for communities

Download Presentation

Incentivizing Communities and Providers to Improve Health and Education Outcomes: PNPM Generasi

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Incentivizing Communities and Providers to Improve Health and Education Outcomes:PNPM Generasi August 19th, 2011

  2. Structure of Presentation • Two forms of “incentives” in the existing program model • Performance-based incentives for communities • Communities provide operational support to front-line providers • Evidence of Impacts • The next frontier: community-based monitoring of service provision through PNPM Generasi?

  3. Incentivizing Communities 12 indicators that communities aim to improve Health: • Four prenatal care visits during pregnancy • Taking iron folate tablets during pregnancy • Delivery assisted by trained professional • Two postnatal care visits • Complete childhood immunization • Ensuring monthly weight increases for infants • Regular weighing for under-fives • Taking Vitamin A twice a year for under-fives Education: • Primary school enrolment • Regular primary school attendance • Junior secondary school enrolment • Regular secondary school attendance

  4. Incentivizing Communities Financial incentives = inter-village yardstick competition • Fixed amounts of block grants to subdistricts • Year 1 block grants: distributed to villages according to population in target age groups • Year 2 block grants: • 80% according to population of target age groups • 20% according to year 1 performance on the 12 indicators

  5. Communities Incentivize Providers—Rationale • Communities can use Generasi support to overcome small-scale supply constraints, such as • Lack of personnel at health and education facilities (midwives, teachers) • Shortages in operational funds for providers and community members that play a role in service delivery (e.g. health caders) • Infrastructure

  6. Communities Incentivize Providers—Operations • Communities establish three sub-district working groups (Pokja Pendidikan, Kesehatan, and Dukungan Layanan) to oversee activities that address supply constraints • Members chosen from village facilitators, school committees, village health volunteers, village elders, dll • Each Pokja maintains a separate collective account at the UPK • Village implementation teams (TPK) oversee and record payments from Pokja funds

  7. Types of Support for Providers • From 2007-2009, communities invested US$835 per village on incentives for providers, including • Honorarium for contract teachers (GTT) • Transportation subsidies for midwives and health cadres • Training and behavior change communication activities (delivered by midwives and health cadres)

  8. Impacts of Incentives for Communities and Providers • Increased community effort at accessing, providing, and monitoring services • Large increase in community uptake of Posyandu services • More health caders at Posyandu • Higher participation in SMP school committee meetings • Increased provider effort • Midwives work longer hours providing services • Increase in some provider quantities • More contract teachers at SMP • Source: PNPM Generasi Impact Evaluation Report (World Bank, 2011)

  9. Community-Based Monitoring in PNPM Generasi? • Communities that successfully manage PNPM Rural and Generasi take on more responsibilities for monitoring service provision • With support from 3rd party facilitators • Community Score Cards for health and education services • Scoring process promotes routine dialogue between communities and providers over score card results • Communities use Generasi funds to reward providers based on performance • Feedback on community and provider performance is communicated to LG: SKPD and DPRD

More Related