1 / 1

We can further study switching out of the P state as a function of dc current

Thermally-Assisted Magnetization Reversal of a Nanomagnet with Spin-Transfer Torque. D. B. Gopman* 1 , D. Bedau, 1 S. Park 2 , D. Ravelosona 2 , E. E. Fullerton 3 , J. A. Katine 4 , S. Mangin 5 & A. D. Kent 1. 1 Department of Physics, New York University, New York, New York 10003, USA

guido
Download Presentation

We can further study switching out of the P state as a function of dc current

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Thermally-Assisted Magnetization Reversal of a Nanomagnet with Spin-Transfer Torque D. B. Gopman*1, D. Bedau,1 S. Park2, D. Ravelosona2, E. E. Fullerton3, J. A. Katine4, S. Mangin5 & A. D. Kent1 1Department of Physics, New York University, New York, New York 10003, USA 2Institut d’Electronique Fondamentale, UMR CNRS 8622, UPS, 91405 Orsay, France 3 CMRR, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0401, USA 4 San Jose Research Center, Hitachi-GST, San Jose, California 95135, USA 5Institut Jean Lamour, UMR CNRS 7198, Nancy Université, UPV Metz, 54506 Vandoeuvre, France *Presenting Author e-mail: daniel.gopman@physics.nyu.edu MOTIVATION SPIN-VALVE NANOPILLAR STATISTICAL MEASUREMENTS, IDC ≠ 0 • We can further study • switching out of the P state • as a function of dc current • Within our statistical accuracy (10,000 runs), data fits equilibrium model • Best-fit parameter E0 for each dataset allows us to determine barrier height dependence on dc current • Magnetization reversal in Co-Ni Spin-Valves • IDC=0 -> Agrees with equilibrium model • IDC ≠ 0 -> Also agrees with a modified energy barrier dependent upon IDC • Barrier height varies monotonically with applied dc current due to influence of spin-transfer torque MOTIVATION • Nanoscale ferromagnets (FMs): Strong candidate for new devices based on spin transport—spintronic devices • Can reverse magnetization by applying a spin current • Switch high anisotropy FMs (U>40 kBT, T=300 K) • Low energy consumption • Applied dc spin currents also reduce the field required to reverse the magnetization • How does a dc spin current alter magnetization reversal? • SPIN VALVE: Nanostructured circuit with two series FM layers • GIANT MAGNETORESISTANCE (GMR) • Change in resistance with H • Easy Readout of Magnetization • RAP >> RP • SPIN-TRANSFER TORQUE • Transfers spin-angular momentum from • conduction electrons to magnetization • Destabilize/Switch Magnetization • Sweep H at fixed rate; measure Hswitch for each trial • Hswitch defined by sharp drop (rise) in GMR signal • Generate Switching histograms for ~ 10,000 magnetic field sweeps • Data is clearly NOT symmetrically distributed • Plot cumulative density on a Gaussian Quantile Scale for visual enhancement • Data (blue dots) fits equilibrium statistical model (red line) of thermal activation • Best-fit curve yields information about the energy barrier, E0, and the coercive field, Hc0 • Two thin film FMs with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy • Both Co/Ni Superlattices • Reference layer magnetically “harder” • 300 nm x 50 nm lithographically patterned elliptical pillar • With extended electrodes for I-V measurements • Magnetoresistance ratio: (RAP-RP)/RP = 0.4 % INTRODUCTION STATIC I-V MEASUREMENTS Current-Induced Reversal Field-Induced Reversal ENERGY BARRIER DEPENDENCE ON IDC STATISTICAL MEASUREMENTS - IDC = 0 THEORY • Magnetization Dynamics • Neel-Brown Thermal Activation • Probability not to switch (H); IDC= 0 • Can we continue to describe the switching field distributions in the presence of spin-transfer torque within this equilibrium model of thermal activation? P->AP Switching μ0Hc0= 175.4 mT Γ0 = 1 GHz v = 100 mT/s E0 = 174.6 kBT CDF CONCLUSION

More Related