40 likes | 167 Views
ScECAL Fermilab Beam Test analysis ScECAL Group Meeting Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea, April 17 th , 2012 Adil Khan, Satoru Uozumi , DongHee Kim. 2 GeV 560334 , 560335, 560337, 560463, 560471 4 GeV 560321, 560329, 560330, 560331, 560332 8GeV
E N D
ScECAL Fermilab Beam Test analysisScECAL Group MeetingKyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea,April 17th, 2012Adil Khan, Satoru Uozumi, DongHee Kim
2 GeV560334 , 560335, 560337, 560463, 560471 4 GeV560321, 560329, 560330, 560331, 560332 8GeV 560249, 560250, 560252, 560305, 560306, 560307, 560460 The Run560252 is not available in our data base of ccp machine(KNU) So this run I did not use. 12GeV 560294, 560295, 560301, 560302 15GeV 560289, 560290, 560291 20 GeV560273, 560275, 560276, 560277, 560284, 560285, 560288 The Run560273 is mentioned on caliceelog as 8GeV instead of 20GeV, so I didn’t count this run too for my analysis 30 GeV560377, 560378, 560379 32 GeV560389, 560390, 560391 I used all these Runs in my Analysis except the Run number In Red Color
Energy Resolution and Linearity for consistency check of CCP machine(at KNU)andbsm machine Sigma/Mean(%) Deposited energy in ScECAL(MIPs) BeamE(GeV) 1/sqrt(E) GeV The Results from bsm and ccp machine are consistent and has been Checked, all shows exactly the same results.
Deviation from linearity Deviation from linearity(%) The consistency for Results from bsm and ccp machine has been Checked, all shows exactly the same results. BeamE(GeV)