1 / 16

Emission Events: Teaching the Basics

Emission Events: Teaching the Basics. Jon Williams TCEQ Work leader, El Paso Region. Congratulations!. Probationary TCEQ Employees No benefits until 3 months have been reached Employment terminates upon exit of the room at any time Learn the most challenging investigation type, FIRST

graceland
Download Presentation

Emission Events: Teaching the Basics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Emission Events: Teaching the Basics Jon Williams TCEQ Work leader, El Paso Region

  2. Congratulations! • Probationary TCEQ Employees • No benefits until 3 months have been reached • Employment terminates upon exit of the room at any time • Learn the most challenging investigation type, FIRST • Also, no salary has been provided in our budget

  3. Why the shift? • You will learn how the investigator thinks while reading your provided information. • Hopefully the rules will make a little more sense. • Also, this should prepare you to provide clearer, more comprehensive event reports.

  4. Initial Report • High points • How was the report received; STEERS, fax, email, or by hand? (Form 10360) • 24 hour clock started from the time they knew about the upset, did they report in time? • Simple statements of what occurred; does it match with Emission Point Numbers, and pollutants released? • Check RQ for everything reported • Start learning about the affected facility and those immediately upstream and downstream. • Learn permit conditions and permit emission limits. • Review compliance history.

  5. Screen Shot of actual STEERS report #1

  6. What was that…? • Missed the 24 hour reporting requirement • What chemical produced the opacity? • Where’s the final? • Not claiming Affirmative Defense

  7. 2 weeks later • High points • Again, check the date of receipt. The final is due 2 weeks from the END of the event. • Did they speciate emissions (Benzene vs. VOC)? • Pollutants compared to EPN, what came out of what? • Does the end result make sense based on the initial? • Must answer all 11 determinations to meet Affirmative Defense. • Must be a COMPLETE answer for each of the determinations. • If the final report doesn’t complete the 11 determinations, request additional information with a deadline.

  8. Screen Shot of actual STEERS report #2

  9. What was that…? #2 • Insufficient detail on final report (e.g. not including the best known cause at the time of reporting) • Incorrect authorized emissions limit

  10. Grouping Emissions • Understand that “VOC” or “PM” is generally not an acceptable way to report emissions for §101 purposes. • (Even though the permit may very well refer to “VOC” or “PM” on its maximum allowable emission rates table (MAERT).) • Carefully read the definition of RQ to understand which mixtures are acceptable to report (e.g. natural gas excluding methane, ethane, etc.) • 30 TAC §101.201(b)(1)(G): They can lump all compounds as “other” for which BOTH of these things are true: • The RQ is 100 lbs or more. • Less than 10 lbs was released in a 24-hour period.

  11. Last Chance • Drill down on any unknowns or questions • How did that cause this? • How was the operator trained? • Maintenance records for affected units. • No more than five years should be requested. (You do have other work) • Operational logs before & after the event. • Ask/compare previous events that may have occurred that were reported to STEERS. • Ask them to provide any additional information that was not specifically asked for that they feel is relevant.

  12. Put it all on the scales • Affirmative Defense • The event couldn’t have been prevented or avoided. • How was this event handled compared to the last one of the same facility. • They have the technology, Better.. Faster... Stronger • The consequences of the events were minimized as much as possible. • All reporting requirements were met.

  13. Screen Shot of actual STEERS report #3

  14. Screen Shot of actual STEERS report #4

  15. Lost Affirmative Defense • Usually fall into these categories: • Operator error • Sub-standard Maintenance Practices • Inadequate design or engineering practices • Not so Usual • Communication time lag- emitting 10 hours while waiting for a decision

  16. Time for Your Questions

More Related