1 / 10

HIV/AIDS BI-ANNUAL REVIEW 2008

Monitoring, Evaluation, Research and Review of the NMSF - goals and indicators Dr Andrew Kitua, NIMR. HIV/AIDS BI-ANNUAL REVIEW 2008. Goal : To use relevant and comprehensive evidence provided in a timely manner in HIV-related planning and decision-making. HIV/AIDS BI-ANNUAL REVIEW 2008.

gasha
Download Presentation

HIV/AIDS BI-ANNUAL REVIEW 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Monitoring, Evaluation, Research and Review of the NMSF- goals and indicators Dr Andrew Kitua, NIMR HIV/AIDS BI-ANNUAL REVIEW 2008

  2. Goal: To use relevant and comprehensive evidence provided in a timely manner in HIV-related planning and decision-making. HIV/AIDS BI-ANNUAL REVIEW 2008

  3. Indicator: Percentage of implementers of HIV and AIDS interventions who report that they have participated in HIV dissemination workshops in the last 12 months HIV/AIDS BI-ANNUAL REVIEW 2008

  4. Sub-theme 1 Enabling environment for M&E functionsIndicator: Percentage of annual funding for HIV interventions that is spent on HIV and AIDS monitoring and evaluation HIV/AIDS BI-ANNUAL REVIEW 2008

  5. Sub-theme 2 Harmonization of data and M&E systems Indicator: 100% of MKUKUTA indicators related to HIV is in the national HIV M&E system, can be monitored, and data are received on a regular basis by the MKUKUTA monitoring team. HIV/AIDS BI-ANNUAL REVIEW 2008

  6. Sub-theme 3Flow of data and the validation of their accuracy • Indicators: • Percentage of health facilities that reported on HIV services that they carried out in the last 12 months • Percentage of implementers of non-medical HIV services that have reported TOMSHA data on time to the districts HIV/AIDS BI-ANNUAL REVIEW 2008

  7. Sub-theme 4Use of HIV data for planning and decision making Indicator: Percentage of CMACs that conducted the required number of feedback workshops in the district where standard information products (as defined in the national HIV M&E system) were shared HIV/AIDS BI-ANNUAL REVIEW 2008

  8. Sub-theme 5HIV research Indicator: Proportion of results of research studies with approval of the health ethics and scientific committee that have been disseminated in Tanzania HIV/AIDS BI-ANNUAL REVIEW 2008

  9. Sub-theme 6 Mid-term Review of the NMSF Indicator: The Midterm Review process was informed by (a) data on the drivers of the epidemic at the sub regional level and (b) indicator values for at least 70% of indicators in the national HIV M&E system. HIV/AIDS BI-ANNUAL REVIEW 2008

  10. Sub-theme 7Final Evaluation of NMSF and Drafting of next NMSF Indicator: The new NMSF is prioritized, based on drivers of the epidemic HIV/AIDS BI-ANNUAL REVIEW 2008

More Related