1 / 10

Source: Dollar 2004

Source: Dollar 2004. « Growth is good for the poor ». Unit of observation: country (over long period). Income growth for the 20% poorest. Average income growth. Source: Dollar and Kray (2001). Cross-country determinants of poverty.

garret
Download Presentation

Source: Dollar 2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Source: Dollar 2004

  2. « Growth is good for the poor » Unit of observation: country (over long period) Income growth for the 20% poorest Average income growth Source: Dollar and Kray (2001)

  3. Cross-country determinants of poverty Note: For details of the estimation and other results see Chen (2003). All estimations reported use ordinary least squares. The endogenous variable in all regression is the poverty gap. A “*” denotes significance at the 10 percent level, “**” at the 5 percent level and “***” at the 1 percent level. Standard errors are White Robust. Sample: 24 low-income countries, 1987-96 Source : Olarreaga & Nicita (2004), « Poverty », Ethiopia DTIS.

  4. Income distribution over time: World, 1970-80 Source: Sala i Martin 2002

  5. Income distribution over time: World 1990-98 Source: Sala i Martin 2002

  6. Poverty: tide turning? Headcount of individuals living on less than $1 a day worldwide First time! million individuals Source: World Bank (2002),"Globalization, Growth and Poverty:Building an Inclusive World Economy"

  7. and more trade doesn’t imply more inequality Unit of observation: country (over long period) Source: Dollar (2001) figure 12

  8. Dependant variable: household per-capita income Micro-economic determinants of poverty: household survey evidence

  9. Effet d’une restriction sur le travail des enfants: analyse traditionnelle Salaire, produit marginal Offre après taxe Offre de travail juvénile des familles taxe salaire d’équil. Demande par les employeurs Emploi enfants

  10. Travail des enfants: le modèle de Basu et Hoang Wan wA C salaire suffisant, pas besoin de mettre les enfants au travail Demande de travail effectif: n f’(Ai+ γ Ci ) = wA B’ wA = 2s B A Travail effectif N (1+ γ)N # adultes # enfants divisé par 2 (puisque productivité moitié moindre)

More Related