1 / 32

Utilizing Hyperion in a Downturn Economy September, 2009

Utilizing Hyperion in a Downturn Economy September, 2009. DENSO & Hyperion Topics. Background about DENSO Utilizing Planning During a Downturn Where did we go from there?. © 2009. 2. Background - DENSO in the Americas.

gaius
Download Presentation

Utilizing Hyperion in a Downturn Economy September, 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Utilizing Hyperion in a Downturn Economy September, 2009

  2. DENSO & Hyperion Topics • Background about DENSO • Utilizing Planning During a Downturn • Where did we go from there? © 2009 2

  3. Background - DENSO in the Americas DENSO is a leading global supplier of automotive technology, systems and components • DENSO International America, Inc.:100% Owned by DENSO Global in Japan • N.A. Regional Headquarters: Southfield, Mich. • Companies: 38 • Employees: 17,000 • Net Sales: US$6.5 billion • Operating Income: US$247.4 million As of March 31, 2007 U.S. dollar amounts have been translated from Japanese yen for convenience only at the rate of 118yen= US$1 Sales figures represent total sales by DENSO company locations, including sales between DENSO companies. © 2009 3 3

  4. Background - DENSO Products CLIMATE CONTROL ENGINE MANAGEMENT DRIVING CONTROL & SAFETY BODY ELECTRONICS HYBRID VEHICLE COMPONENTS INFO. & COMMUNICATIONS © 2009 4

  5. Background - Hyperion @ DENSO Hyperion Planning has been in use at DENSO for the past four years supporting about 500 users. • Introduced at NA HQ in Southfield, Mich. – 2004 • Implemented at two plants in Tenn. – 2005 • Implemented at plant in Battle Creek, Mich. – 2006 • Implemented at plant in Arkansas - 2007 © 2009 5

  6. Background - Hyperion @ DENSO Hyperion Essbase – since 2005 (previously used Enterprise)Note: HFM used for Global Consolidations • NA Consolidations • Treasury Cash Flow • Quality PPM Reporting • Credit Limit Analysis • AR Analysis • BOD Dashboard Related Technology in Use at DENSO • JDE – General Ledger • Oracle – HR (Benefits & Performance Management) © 2009 6

  7. CPM Scope Across an Enterprise ENTERPRISE STRATEGY EXECUTION Formulation Implementation Control and Evaluation Scorecard IT STRATEGY EXECUTION FINANCE STRATEGY EXECUTION HR STRATEGY EXECUTION SALES / MARKETING STRATEGY EXECUTION OPERATIONS STRATEGY EXECUTION Scorecard Scorecard Scorecard Scorecard Scorecard Dashboards IT Forecasting Workforce Forecasting Sales Forecasting Production Planning Initiative Management Financial Reporting Recruiting/Retention Sales Analytics Supply Chain Analytics ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONOS ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS IT Financial Analytics P&L Analysis Diversity/Demographics Customer Analytics Productivity Analytics IT Operations Analytics Consolidation Compensation/Benefits Promotion Analytics Other … Rolling Forecast Dashboards Dashboards Dashboards Dashboards BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE & DATA WAREHOUSE COMPETENCY WHAT • Planning the work • Planning expenditures • Ongoing Prioritization Process and Sponsorship HOW • Data Architecture • Data Management Disciplines • Tools • Methodology /Processes/Governance WHO • Organization structure design • Roles and Responsibilities Definitions • Talent Management • Skills Optimization • Recruiting © 2009 * Areas DENSO is involved in. Source: Hitachi Consulting

  8. Planning @ DENSO © 2009

  9. Dept plan Dept plan Dept plan Dept plan ORACLE (wage) JDE (FA) JDE (P/L) Summarize OCEANS (std cost) Manual calc Manual calc Manual calc Create Plan P/L Manual Collection of data Plan Analysis (return to each source file) Follow-up Actual vs. Plan (return to each source file) Planning @ DENSO: Problem Solving Why Planning? Escape from Excel (only) Hell © 2009 9

  10. Planning @ DENSO:Centralized Planning Environment JDE © 2009 10

  11. Planning @ DENSO:Core Benefits • Data accuracy improvements from an increased amount of iterations that can be performed in a planning cycle (10 weeks to 5 weeks) • Calculation and consolidation consistency (removes the spreadsheet errors issue, manual consolidation) • Capability for monthly forecasting • Data integrity • Security • Versions (Working, Final, What-if’s) & Scenarios (Actual, Plan, Forecast) © 2009 11

  12. Utilizing Planning during a Downturn © 2009

  13. Economic Slowdown: Backdrop NA HQ Challenges - Southfield Mich. • In FY08, by the end of the mid-year Planning cycle we realized we needed to re-vamp our reporting process • Contingency Planning (from Cuts to Give Backs): • Economic situation was getting worse month by month • Forced into a monthly forecasting mode • Three cut/give-back cycles before end of fiscal year © 2009 13

  14. Economic Slowdown: Reporting Updating Management Reporting • New Director of Corporate Planning needed to take action: • Updated what core expenses should be managed closerFrom list of 300+ Accounts to ~100 with Categories © 2009 14

  15. Economic Slowdown: Reporting Updating Management Reporting • New Director of Corporate Planning and Finance Controller • Learned how to utilize the Hyperion tools to navigate the Planning database himself • Hyperion Essbase Excel Add-In and Smart View • Hyperion Financial Reporting – automated reports • Hyperion Web Analysis – Expense Trending by Year © 2009 15

  16. Economic Slowdown: Reporting Updating Management Reporting • New Director of Corporate Planning needed to take action: • Improve Department Management and Divisional monthly review of Actual to Plan • Process re-engineering on how departmental and divisional financials are reviewed • Newly Designed Reports © 2009 16

  17. Economic Slowdown: Management Reporting Cont. Updating Management Reporting • Report allows user to expanding the category down to the account level by clicking the arrow © 2009 17

  18. Economic Slowdown: Management Reporting Cont. Department users download their report to Excel to input Variance Explanations or Identify Give-Back opportunities: © 2009 18

  19. Economic Slowdown: Management Reporting Cont. In addition, the department managers can sign-up to receive a report automatically when we load actual data every month: © 2009 19

  20. Where did we go from there? © 2009

  21. Where did we go from there? Fiscal Year 2009 Process Change: • Implement a ‘Quarterly Commitment’ Scenario next to Plan to help us stay on budget for the year. • Commitment amount will be captured at a department total level. • Eliminate budget variances at the end of each quarter. © 2009 21

  22. Where did we go from there? Moving to a permanent change in budgeting & forecasting for Fiscal Year 2009: • Utilize web input form & Smart View to capture Commitment amounts at a Quarter level. • The amount is a by department for all accounts. © 2009 22

  23. Where did we go from there? Moving to a permanent change in budgeting & forecasting for Fiscal Year 2009: • Smart View Option: © 2009 23

  24. Where did we go from there? Fiscal Year 2009 Process Change: • Eliminate budget variances at the end of each quarter: • Under budget depts. dollars will be reallocated to division top • Over spending will be carried forward to be offset by reallocations • Planning Business rules will automatically reallocate variances by dept into divisional placeholder © 2009 24

  25. Plan – Commitment – Actual QTD Actual to Plan - QTD Where did we go from there? Divisional Review Template – Used by Marketing, Engineering and Corporate Function Division Tops © 2009 25

  26. Where did we go from there? Departmental Review Template – Used by all Department Managers in their divisional reviews QTD Actual to Commitment Monthly Actual to Plan (by Acct) QTD Actual to Plan (by Acct) © 2009 26

  27. Where did we go from there? FY09 Additions to DNABPS – “Project Checkbook” • Including ‘Purchase Requisition’ and ‘Purchase Order’ summary information • Purpose is to help departments understand their ‘Committed Funds’ big picture • Provide Financial Reports that assist the end user in submitting their Quarterly Form requests (Rollovers) © 2009 27

  28. Where did we go from there? Checkbook Visibility - Committed Funds • Purchase Request = approved/denied, can be modified • Purchase Order = generated from PR’s to-be posted (typically 2-3 days or scheduled) • Actual = JDE Posted ‘spent’ #’s Committed Funds PR PO JDE + + = © 2009 28

  29. Where did we go from there? Financial Reports Additions Three reports to assist the department manager: Key is to help manager have visibility to the bigger picture and balance the ‘Checkbook’ © 2009 29

  30. Where did we go from there? Presenting the ‘Checkbook-Committed Funds’ Big Picture © 2009 30

  31. Where did we go from there? Presenting the ‘Checkbook-Committed Funds’ Big Picture © 2009 31

  32. Q&A © 2009

More Related