1 / 25

Fostering Creativity in the Science and Mathematics Classroom

Fostering Creativity in the Science and Mathematics Classroom. Sheila Tobias. Author . Overcoming Math Anxiety Succeed with Math Breaking the Science Barrier Revitalizing Undergraduate Science The Hidden Curriculum: Faculty-Made Tests in Science They’re not Dumb, They’re Different

frieda
Download Presentation

Fostering Creativity in the Science and Mathematics Classroom

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fostering Creativityin the Science and Mathematics Classroom Sheila Tobias

  2. Author • Overcoming Math Anxiety • Succeed with Math • Breaking the Science Barrier • Revitalizing Undergraduate Science • The Hidden Curriculum: Faculty-Made Tests in Science • They’re not Dumb, They’re Different • Rethinking Science as a Career

  3. Why Creativity is Importantto America’s Future Innovation EducationScienceMathCreativity NewBusiness Economy New Jobs

  4. Innovation=Bringing an Invention or a New Idea to Market • Not enough to generate creative technical people • Have to educate business leaders to understand and appreciate inventiveness • This means: Science and Mathematics for All

  5. Capacity to InnovateWhat the Scholars Tell us • The cognitive ability to produce novel and valuable ideas [Torrance, 1988] Students who use content in creative ways learn the content well. They also learn strategies for identifying problems, making decisions, and finding solutions both in and out of school. [Starko, 1994] • 21st century schools should foster creativity, judgement, the ability to think, and the power of expression [Ogawa, Kuehn-Ebert, Devito, 1991].

  6. When the Teacher Values Creativity in the Science/Mathematics Classroom • Modeling Creativity • Stimulating Creativity • Rewarding Creativity • (above all) Not Punishing Creativity

  7. The Opposite: Rote Learning [Refs: Torrance, 1962,Weistein, 1991 Takahashi, 1993] • Memorization • Recognition of learned materials • Recitation • Seatwork • Teacher-directed small group discussions • Structured instructions

  8. Creativity Educationin General is Fostered by • Student-Centered classroom • High-level Interaction with teacher, with other students • Less structured lesson plan • Exposure to various learning strategies; allowing students to choose their own • Active participation (performance) • Self-management

  9. Personality Variables and General Creativity • Passionate, positive, tenacious, and energetic • Has a long attention span • Does not like a biased view or prejudice • Unique and original, divergent thinking • High self esteem • Looks for various solutions, even after a single solution has been found

  10. But may be Difficult to Teach • Perseverance: sticks to an idea but • Is often impatient • Must finish what he/she starts • Responsible and tenacious but • Indifferent to others’ opinions • Spontaneous, headstrong, even rude

  11. How do you knowwhat you thinkyou know? What would youlike to know? What doyou know? Do you knowwhat you thoughtyou knew? What newinformationhave youlearned? Topic

  12. Cultivating a Proper Attitude toward Errors “I find my mistakes interesting; my confusions even more so. They are windows into my thinking.” “What is making this problem difficult for me? How can I make it easier for myself?” Reif’s “extra points” – Distinguish your trivial from nontrivial errors. Describe how you will avoid trivial errors. Discuss your nontrivial errors in some detail.

  13. Question Posing [Bloom, 1956, Himsl and Millar, 1993] Bloom found that >95% of test questions are at Lowest level, recall of information

  14. Question Posing 2 Himsl and Millar (1993) • Stage One – Gathering Information • Factual: what? why? how many? • Procedural: information as to how something happened • Stage Two – Organizing Information: • Higher level “why” questions including “why not” questions • Stage Three – Extending Information • Hypothetical questions: what might happen next? What else might have happened? • Speculative questions: creating new knowledge

  15. Teaching Techniques • Mosteller’s Minute Paper: • 1. What was the theme of this unit? • 2.What would you like to learn more about? • 3. What was the muddiest issue?

  16. Thoughts Feelings Speculations What if Questions Solution in a logical sequential form Divided Page Exercise

  17. Three part Math Exam • One-third credit for the correct answer • One-third credit for finding MORE than one way to solve the problem • One-third credit for writing a paragraph-long essay on what makes the problem mathematically interesting • (This could be done for science, as well)

  18. Making Use of Other People’s Research • Crux issues in experimental research • Stories around research breakthroughs • Description of current unsolved problems

  19. Vary Approach: Howard Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences(1983, 1999) Verbal Existential Musical Naturalist Kinesthetic Visual Logic Interpersonal Math

  20. Inquiry-Based Learning • Change in Emphasis from “What we Know” to “How we come to know.” • Development of inquiry skills • Nurturing of inquiring attitudes, habits of mind • Going from known to unknown to generating new knowledge • Becoming not an “all-knower” but an “expert learner” • Arons: Introduction to Teaching of Physics • MacDermott

  21. Constructivism • Theory: • Learners are active creators of their own knowledge by asking questions, exploring subject, and constantly assessing what and how they know. • Each new knowledge must be reconciled with prior understanding; else false models (previous knowledge/paradigms) continue to prevail • Teaching through pupil-generated experiments, real-world problem solving, discussion, debate • Role of Teacher: • Coach

  22. Developing Expert Learner • Expert sees patterns and meaning not apparent to novices • Experts have in-depth knowledge of their fields, structured so that it is most useful • Facts in experts’ memory are accessible, transferable, and applicable to a variety of situations • Experts can easily retrieve their knowledge and learn new information in their fields with little effort.

  23. Concept Mapping [Ausubel, Novak, U.S. Buzan, U.K.] • Teacher use: • To communicate complex ideas • Student use: • To explicitly integrate new and old knowledge • Assessment use: • To assess understanding or diagnose misunderstanding

  24. The Latest Word on “Learning Styles” Abuse: “Don’t expect me to take notes teacher. I’m an auditory learner.” Facts: Most professionals use more than one learning style, choose most suitable to problem/situation Our goal as educators is to “e-ducare” lead one out of one’s comfort zone into new methods of learning

  25. References • www.sheilatobias.com • www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/month6/ • www.officeport.com/edu/blooms.html • Journal of Creative Behavior • Ai-Girl, Tan, “Singaporean Teachers’ Perception of Activities Useful for Fostering Creativity” (2001) • Norko Srek, Xitro Fan, Lani Van Dusen,“A Comparative Study of Creative Thinking of American and Japanese College Students” (2001). • Howard Gardner, “Frames of Mind” (1983), “The Disciplined Mind” (1999), “Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligence for the 21st Century” (1999). • National Science Resources Center www.nsrconline.org • J.D. Novak,, “Clarify with Concept maps (1991), How do we learn our lesson? (1993) • M.J. Lawson “Concept Mapping,” 1994 • T. Buzan “The MindMap book”, 1995. • Richard Felder, Learning Styles

More Related