kossek ozeki jap 1998 presented by matthew d tuttle
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Kossek & Ozeki, JAP, 1998 Presented by: Matthew D. Tuttle

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 7

Kossek & Ozeki, JAP, 1998 Presented by: Matthew D. Tuttle - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 176 Views
  • Uploaded on

Work-Family Conflict, Policies, and the Job-Life Satisfaction Relationship: A Review and Directions for Organizational Behavior-Human Resources Research. Kossek & Ozeki, JAP, 1998 Presented by: Matthew D. Tuttle. Introduction of Topic. Good explanation of why study should be conducted

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Kossek & Ozeki, JAP, 1998 Presented by: Matthew D. Tuttle' - fredricka-elijah


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
kossek ozeki jap 1998 presented by matthew d tuttle

Work-Family Conflict, Policies, and the Job-Life Satisfaction Relationship: A Review and Directions for Organizational Behavior-Human Resources Research

Kossek & Ozeki, JAP, 1998

Presented by: Matthew D. Tuttle

introduction of topic
Introduction of Topic
  • Good explanation of why study should be conducted
      • Acknowledge existing relationship; results scattered
      • Goals of MA are clear
  • Interesting presentation of multiple viewpoints
      • Role conflict (WFC) and HR Policy
review of past research
Review of Past Research
  • 3 competing theories of work-family conflict
      • Helps frame current MA
      • Not tested as a moderator
  • Role conflict literature mostly W-->F Conflict
  • HR policy literature mostly F-->W Conflict
  • Authors address gaps in both literatures
inclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria
  • List of criteria is very specific
    • Used studies dating back to 60’s- outdated?
    • Used only published data in academic journals
      • Results may be inflated
      • No file drawer analysis conducted
    • Used H&S to cumulate results within studies
      • Reduced number of correlations; no thorough explanation
    • No Inter-Rater Reliability estimates
analyses
Analyses
  • Used H&S
    • Corrected for sampling and measurement error for each individual study
    • Analyzed weighted and unweighted effect sizes
    • Many of the subgroup analyses were based on <30 studies
    • No credibility intervals reported
    • No type I error control for moderators
results
Results
  • Results summarized well
    • Corrected correlations ranged from -.18 to -.37 for job satisfaction and -.25 to -.42 for life satisfaction
  • Report that bidirectional work-family measures may be best predictor of job sat.
    • Probably due to sampling error
    • If not, capitalizing on variance accounted for?
discussion
Discussion
  • Excellent summary of findings and what they mean for policy makers
  • Call for future research on work-family conflict as a mediator between HR policies and satisfaction
  • Call for future studies to have more heterogeneous samples and more homogeneous measures
ad