1 / 8

6-10GHz Rate-Range and Link Budget

6-10GHz Rate-Range and Link Budget. Date: 2012-09-18. Authors:. Abstract. This document examines rate and range estimates based on channel models for 6-10.5GHz as an extension frequency band for 802.11ac. This Presentation. Throughput estimates for possible 6-10GHz extensions to 11ac

Download Presentation

6-10GHz Rate-Range and Link Budget

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 6-10GHz Rate-Range and Link Budget Date: 2012-09-18 Authors:

  2. Abstract This document examines rate and range estimates based on channel models for 6-10.5GHz as an extension frequency band for 802.11ac.

  3. This Presentation • Throughput estimates for possible 6-10GHz extensions to 11ac • Comparison to Rate-Range for existing 11ac PHY • Link Budget

  4. Summary • An up-sampled 11ac (11ac x 4) • 0.9 us symbol duration for short GI (0.1 us CP) • 1.0 us symbol duration for long GI (0.2 us CP) • 512 FFT/IFFT • 640 MHz channel bandwidth • Carrier spacing = 1250 KHz • Path Loss Parameters [1] PL= PL0 +g*log10(dist.)

  5. PHY Throughput • A 1x1 640 MHz system can provide high bandwidth for very low compressed video. This leads to low latency and high quality required for docking and display application. • A 2x2 640 MHz system can provide throughput in excess of 60GHz devices possibly at lower system cost and power consumption. • The wide bandwidth systems provide in excess of 5Gbps throughput for WLAN applications.

  6. Estimated Rate vs Range (LoS) • Comparison of estimated throughput of 6-10GHz solution with 11ac 80 and 160 MHz solution. In both cases a 1x1 system is considered. • Path Loss models for 6-10GHz are based on ‘IEEE 802.15-02/278r0-SG3a’ The Ultra-wideband Indoor Path Loss Model. Path Loss models for 5GHz are based on IEEE 802.11-03/940r3 “TGn Channel Models’. • In typical applications 6-10 GHz provides 2x the throughput of 160 MHz transmissions along with reduced channel interference, lower power consumption and available world wide spectrum for multiple channel transmission. It also is a simple extension to IEEE 802.11ac reusing the antenna, baseband and MAC technology.

  7. Link Budget for 1x1 SISO Note: Assumes 0dBi antenna, PL=47+17Log10(d) per Molisch, et al.

  8. Summary • 6-10 GHz offers a minimum of 5 channels of 500MHz, each of which can have 1Gbps or more in a cubicle usage model • Spectrum regulations are in place worldwide • Can use SISO or “easy” MIMO (2x2, 16-QAM) • Most capacity improvement comes from B term in Shannon • Some new MCS will need to be added to 11ac • Power consumption of a PHY in these new bands is comparable to 802.11ac and is well suited to mobile platforms • RF design complexity and propagation behavior of signals in these bands is comparable to 802.11ac • 6-10 GHz Could be used by PAN applications freeing up limited 5GHz for Infrastructure/Internet access • Addition of 6-10GHz bands to an 802.11ac PHY gives significant additional spatial capacity for peer-to-peer applications with minimal complexity increase

More Related