1 / 25

The Gender Challenge at The Academy

The Gender Challenge at The Academy. Is there a challenge?. Should we do something about it?. 14 years (lecturer / senior lecturer to assoc. prof : 16/11.5 years). 14 years (lecturer / senior lecturer to assoc. prof : 16/11.5 years). We want gender equality:.

finnea
Download Presentation

The Gender Challenge at The Academy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Gender Challenge at The Academy • Is there a challenge? • Should we do something about it?

  2. 14 years (lecturer / senior lecturer to assoc. prof: 16/11.5 years)

  3. 14 years (lecturer / senior lecturer to assoc. prof: 16/11.5 years)

  4. We want gender equality: Pure economical justification, exploiting the human asset. Equality, especially in the academia. Heterogeneity, and especially women, lead to a better working environment.

  5. Cognitive differences??? National math exams: US department of education, 2007

  6. Pro-women acts did make a difference: undergraduate master phd Proportion of women graduating in Israel

  7. Why so few? • Postdoc as a significant barrier. • Traditional roles in the family, overlap between the first years of an academic career and of motherhood, different “priorities in life”, expectations of the society. • Viewing the academia as a cold and competitive place. • (Some fields, mainly natural sciences): masculine image. • Stereotypical thinking, preference of the like in situations of uncertainty, lack of women in “the corridor culture”.

  8. Why so few? • Postdoc as a significant barrier. • Traditional roles in the family, overlap between the first years of an academic career and of motherhood, different “priorities in life”, expectations of the society. • Viewing the academia as a cold and competitive place. • (Some fields, mainly natural sciences): masculine image. • Stereotypical thinking, preference of the like in situations of uncertainty, lack of women in “the corridor culture”. √ √ √ √

  9. Why so few? 5. Stereotypical thinking, preference of the like in situations of uncertainty, lack of women in “the corridor culture”. Gender bias! Exists, indeed, also in our own backyard.

  10. John and Joan 1968/1986 1: good 5: bad

  11. The effect of switching to blind reviews:

  12. Competence score (“grade the applicant”) vs. scientific productivity (publications, citations)

  13. ISF success rate in grant proposals: men success rate women success rate (5-10% out of ~35%, thus 15-30%)

  14. More: • Analysis of recommendation letters (312 letters to leading medicine schools in US): significant disparity in superlatives, confidence in the recommendation, length, technical details,… • Adding a curtain in orchestra auditions increased the number of women by 30%-60%. • … “after some periods of drought, she seems to find her place…”, “…took her a long time to found a lab”, “… little participation in international meetings…” Lack of awareness…

  15. Gender bias: intentional or subconscious? Subconscious, and the stronger is the claim to control the subconscious, the stronger the bias is.

  16. Harvard Implicit Association test Male Female Wife

  17. Harvard Implicit Association test Science Liberal Arts Math

  18. Harvard Implicit Association test Science or Male Liberal arts or Female Boy

  19. Harvard Implicit Association test Science or Male Liberal arts or Female Physics

  20. Harvard Implicit Association test Science or Female Liberal arts or Male History

  21. We got the position, now what? Leadership: who leads the discussion?

  22. We got the position, now what? Personality: who is nice? Penalties for success: reaction to women who succeed in men gender-typed tasks (2004)

  23. Why so few? • Postdoc. • Motherhood. • Atmosphere. • Masculine fields. • Gender bias.

  24. What can we do? • Postdoc. • Motherhood. • Atmosphere. • Masculine fields. • Gender bias. Note, beware, remember: • Barriers that money can solve / involve an academic compromise. • We don’t want to perpetuate the traditional roles in the family. • We want parents to enjoy their kids (and vice versa). • Kids grow up, faculty members are here for many years. Be aware. Make other aware.

More Related